Advertisement

The purpose of qualitative research

  • Janice M. Morse
  • Peggy Anne Field

Abstract

Research fills a vital and important role in society: it is the means by which discoveries are made, ideas are confirmed or refuted, events controlled or predicted and theory developed or refined. All of these functions contribute to the development of knowledge. However, no single research approach fulfills all of these functions, and the contribution of qualitative research is both vital and unique to the goals of research in general. Qualitative research enables us to make sense of reality, to describe and explain the social world and to develop explanatory models and theories. It is the primary means by which the theoretical foundations of social sciences may be constructed or re-examined.

Keywords

Qualitative Research Qualitative Method Quantitative Research Ground Theory Qualitative Researcher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bohannan, L. (1956/1992) Shakespeare in the bush, in Qualitative Health Research, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 20–30.Google Scholar
  2. Brace, C.L., Gamble, G.R. and Bond, J.T. (eds) (1971) Race and Intelligence: Anthropological Studies Number 8, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Burton, A. (1974) The nature of personality theory, in Operational Theories of Personality, (ed. A. Burton), Brunner/Mazel, New York, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  4. Chapman, C.R. (1976) Measurement of pain: problems and issues. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, 1, 345.Google Scholar
  5. Corbin, J. (1986) Coding, writing memos, and diagramming, in From Practice to Grounded Theory, (eds W.C. Chenitz and J.M. Swanson), Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 91–101.Google Scholar
  6. Duffy, M.E. (1985) Designing nursing research: the qualitative — quantitative debate. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 10, 225–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliott, M.R. (1983) Maternal infant bonding. Canadian Nurse, 79(8), 28–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Engelhardt, H.T. (1974/1992) The disease of masturbation: values and the concept of disease, in Qualitative Health Research, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 5–19.Google Scholar
  9. Feyerabend, P. (1978) Against Method, Varo, London.Google Scholar
  10. Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Glaser, B.G. (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity, The Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Goodwin, L.D. and Goodwin, W.L. (1984) Qualitative vs. quantitative research or qualitative and quantitative research? Nursing Research, 33(6), 378–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hinds, P.S., Chaves, D.E. and Cypess, S.M. (1992) Context as a source of meaning and understanding, in Qualitative Health Research, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 31–49.Google Scholar
  15. Klaus, M.H. and Kennel, J.H. (1976) Parent Infant Bonding: The Impact of Early Separation or Loss on Family Development, Mosby, St Louis.Google Scholar
  16. Morse, J.M. (1989/1992) ‘Euch, those are for your husband!’: examination of cultural values and assumptions associated with breastfeeding, in Qualitative Health Research, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 50–60.Google Scholar
  17. Morse, J.M. (1992) If you believe in theories.... Qualitative Health Research, 2(3), 259–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morse, J.M., Harrison, M. and Prowse, M. (1986) Minimal breastfeeding. Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 15(4), 333–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pelto, P.J. and Pelto, G.H. (1978) Anthropological Research: The Structure of Inquiry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scheper-Hughes, N. (1992) Death Without Weeping, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, J.K. (1983) Quantitative versus qualitative research: an attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, J.K. and Heshusius, L. (1986) Closing down the conversation: the end of the quantitative — qualitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  24. Tesch, S. (1981) Disease causality and politics. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 6(1), 369–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vidich, A.J. and Lyman, S.M. (1994) Qualitative methods: their history in sociology and anthropology, in Handbook of Qualitative Research, (eds N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 23–59.Google Scholar
  26. Wolcott, H.F. (1992) Posturing in qualitative research, in The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, (eds M.D. LeCompte, W.L. Millroy and J. Preissle), Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 3–52.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Atkinson, P. (1994) Some perils of paradigms. Qualitative Health Research, 5(1).Google Scholar
  2. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) (1994) Part II: Major paradigms and perspectives, in Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 99–198.Google Scholar
  3. Filstead, W.J. (ed.) (1970) Qualitative Methodology: Firsthand Involvement with the Social World, Rand McNally, Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Gilbert, N. (ed.) (1993) Researching Social Life, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  5. Glassner, B. and Moreno, J.D. (eds) (1989) The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in the Social Sciences, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  6. Hammersley, M. (ed) (1993) Social Research: Philosophy, Politics and Practice, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  7. Morse, J.M. (ed.) (1992) Part I: The characteristics of qualitative research, in Qualitative Health Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
  8. Morse, J.M., Bottorff, J.L., Neander, W. et al. (1991/1992) Comparative analysis of conceptualizations and theories of caring, in Qualitative Health Research, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
  9. Noblit, G.W. and Engel, J.D. (1991/1992) The holistic injunction: an ideal and a moral imperative for qualitative research, in Qualitative Health Research, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 43–63.Google Scholar
  10. Rabinow, P. and Sullivan, W.M. (eds) (1979) Interpretive Social Science: A Reader, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Smith, R.B. and Manning, P.K. (eds) (1982) A Handbook of Social Science Methods, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Janice M. Morse and Peggy Anne Field 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janice M. Morse
    • 1
  • Peggy Anne Field
    • 2
  1. 1.School of NursingPennsylvania State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of NursingUniversity of AlbertaCanada

Personalised recommendations