Skip to main content

Abstract

Resource planning problems present many excellent examples of why multicriterion optimization (MCO) can be so useful in practice. These problems virtually always involve a public decision-making process, and they virtually never can be characterized as having a single criterion. The protection of the environment—a particular kind of resource planning problem—is by its very nature a multicriterion problem: the environment is being “protected from” economic activities. Thus, problems in environmental control are born out of conflict between criteria: economic development and environmental preservation. Resource problems, in general, exhibit these criteria and others, such as equity in the distribution of benefits and costs—the classic upstream-downstream conflict in water resource problems—and risk to human health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Maass, A., Hufschmidt, M., Dorfman, R., Thomas, H. Jr., Marglin, S., and Fair, G., Design of Water Resource Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marglin, S., Public Investment Criteria, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Major, D., Multiobjective Water Resources Planning, Water Resources Monograph No. 4, Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., 1977.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Major, D., and Lenton, R., Multiobjective Multi-Model River Basin Planning: The MIT Argentina Project, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haimes, Y., Hall, W., and Freedman, H., Multiobjective Optimization in Water Resources Systems: The Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohon, J. L., and Marks, D., Multiobjective Screening Models and Water Resources Investment, Water Resources Research, 9, 826–836, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohon, J. L., Church, R. L., and Sheer, D. P., Generating Multiobjective Tradeoffs: An Algorithm for Bicriterion Problems, Water Resources Research, 15, 1001–1010, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohon, J. L., Muliiobjective Programming and Planning, Academi C., New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zeleny, M, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goicoechea, A., Duckstein, L., and Fogel, M. M., Multiple Objectives under Uncertainty: An Illustrative Application of Protrade, Water Resources Research, 15, 203–210, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chankong, V., and Haimes, Y., Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1983.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Steuer, R., Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application, Wiley, New York, 1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. MacCrimmon, K. R., An Overview of Multiple Objective Decision Making, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, (J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds.), University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benayoun, R., DeMontgolfier, J., Tergny, J., and Larichev, O. I., Linear Programming with Multiple Objective Functions: STEP Method, Mathematical Programming, 1, 366–375, 1971.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. DeNeufville, R., and Keeney, R., Multiattribute Preference Analysis for Transportation Systems Evaluation, Transportation Research, 7, 63–76, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keeney, R. L., Siting of Energy Facilities, Academi C., New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keeney, R. L., and Wood, E. F., An Illustrative Example of Multiattribute Utility Theory for Water Resources Planning, Water Resources Research, 13, 705–172, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Austin, T., Utilization of Models in Water Resources, Water Resources Bulletin, 22, 49–56, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. U.S. Water Resources Council, Water and Related Land Resources, Establishment of Principles and Standards for Planning, Federal Register, 38, No. 24778, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Loucks, D. P., An Application of Interactive Multiobjective Water Resources Planning, Interfaces, 8, 70–75, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Greis, N. P., Wood, E. F., and Steuer R. E., Multicriteria Analysis of Water Allocation in a River Basin: The Tchebycheff Approach, Water Resources Research, 18, 865–875, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Allam, M. N., and Marks, D. H., Irrigation, Agricultural Expansion Planning in Developing Countries: Resilient System Design, Water Resources Research, 20, 775–784, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. David, L., and Duckstein, L., Multicriterion Ranking of Alternative Long-Range Water Resource System, Water Resources Bulletin, 2, 731–754, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gershon, M., Duckstein, L., and McAniff, R., Multiobjective River Basin Planning with Qualitative Criteria, Water Resources Research, 18, 193–202, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nijkamp, P., and Vos, J., A Multicriteria Analysis for Water Resource and Land Use Development, Water Resources Research, 13, 513–518, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Massam, B. H., The Central Arizona Water Control Study: A Comparison of Alternative Plans using Concordance Analysis and Multidimensional Scaling, Water Resources Bulletin, 20, 483–491, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Major, D., Multiobjective Redesign of the Big Walnut Project, in Systems Planning and Design (R. de Neufville and D. Marks, eds.), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Miller, W., and Byers, D., Development and Display of Multiple Objective Project Impacts, Water Resources Research, 9, 11–20, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yeh, W., Reservoir Management and Operation Models: A State-of-the-Art Review, Water Resources Research, 21, 1797–1818, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas, H., and ReVelle, C. S., On the Efficient Use of High Aswan Dam for Hydropower and Irrigation, Management Sciences, 12, 296–311, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guariso, G., Haynes, K. E., Whittington, D., and Younis, M., Energy, Agriculture, and Water: A Multiobjective Programming Analysis of the Operations of the Aswan High Dam, Environment and Planning A, 12, 369–379, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Oven-Thompson, K., Alercon, L., and Marks, D. H., Agricultural versus Hydropower Tradeoffs in the Operation of the High Aswan Dam, Water Resources Research, 18, 1605–1613, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Palmer, R. N., Smith, J., Cohon, J. L., and ReVelle, C. S., Reservoir Management in the Potomac River Basin, ASCE Journal of the Water Resources Planning and Management Division, 108, No. WR1, 47–66, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tauxe, G. W., Mades, D. M., and Inman, R. R., Multiple Objectives in Reservoir Operation, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management Division, 106, No. WR1, 225–238, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yeh, W., and Becker, L., Multiobjective Analysis of Multireservoir Operations, Water Resources Research, 18, pp. 1326–1336, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Guariso, G., Rinaldi, S., and Soncini-Sessa, R., The Management of Lake Como: A Multiobjective Analysis, Water Resources Research, 22, 109–120, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Can, E. K., and Houck, M. H., Real Time Reservoir Operations by Goal Programming, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management Division, 110, No. WR3, 297–309, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Croley, T. E., and Raja Rao, K. N., Multiobjective Risks in Reservoir Operation, Water Resources Research, 15, 807–814, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hashimoto, T., Stedinger, J. R., and Loucks, D. P., Reliability, Resiliency and Vulnerability Criteria for Water Resources System Performance Evaluation, Water Resources Research, 18, 14–20, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Moy, W.-S., Cohon, J. L., and ReVelle, C. S., A Programming Model for Analysis of the Reliability, Resilience and Vulnerability of a Water Supply Reservoir, Water Resources Research, 22, 489–498, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Thomann, R., Mathematical Model for Dissolved Oxygen, ASCE Journal of Sanitary Engineering Division, 89, pp. 1–30, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  43. U.S. Water Pollution Control Administration, Delaware Estuary Comprehensive Study, U.S. Department of the Interior, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Smith, E., and Morris, A., Systems Analysis for Optimal Water Quality Management, Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 41, 1635–1646, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Brill, E., Leibman, J., and ReVelle, C. S., Equity Measures for Exploring Water Quality Management Alternatives, Water Resources Research, 12, 845–851, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Dorfman, R., and Jacoby, H., A Model of Public Decision Illustrated by a Water Pollution Policy Problem, Public Expenditures and Policy Analysis (R. Havernan and J. Margolis, eds.), Markham, Chicago, Illinois, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Monarchi, D., Kisiel, C., and Duckstein, L., Interactive Multiobjective Programming in Water Resources: A Case Study, Water Resources Research, 9, 837–850, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Das, P., and Haimes, Y. Y., Multiobjective Optimization in Water Quality and Land Management, Water Resources Research, 15, 1313–1322, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Olenik, S. C., and Haimes, Y. V., A Hierarchial Multiobjective Framework for Water Resources Planning, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-9, 534–544, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sawaragi, Y., Nakayama, H., Tanino, T., and Okumura, C., Interactive Optimization Method for Multiobjective Regional Problems, Japan Association for Automatic Control Engineers, IBM, Japan, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Male, J. W., and Ogawa, H., Tradeoff in Water Quality Management, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management Division, 110, 434–444, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Louie, P. W. F., Yeh, W. W. G., and Hsu, N. S., Multiobjective Water Resources Management Planning, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management Division, 110, 39–56, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. ReVelle, C. S., Loucks, D., and Lynn, W., A Management Model for Water Quality Control, Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 39, 1164–1183, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  54. ReVelle, C. S., Loucks, D., and Lynn, W., Linear Programming Applied to Water Quality Management, Water Resources Research, 4, 1–9, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ellis, J. H., McBean, E. A., and Farquhar, G. J., Deterministic Linear Programming Model for Acid Rain Abatement, ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Division, 111, 119–139, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Perlack, R. D., and Willis, C. E., Multiobjective Decision Making in Water Disposal Planning, ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering Division, 111, 373–385, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Harrald, J., et al., A Note on the Limitations of Goal Programming as Observed in Resource Allocation for Marine Environmental Protection, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 25, 733–739, 1978.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Palmer, R. N., and Lund, J. R., Multiobjective Analysis with Subjective Information, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management Division, 111, 399–416, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Casman, E., D-Optimal Sampling Designs for the Streeter-Phelps Model, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, Ph.D. thesis, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kavrakoglu, I., and Kiziltan, G., Multiobjective Strategies in Power Systems Planning, European Journal of Operational Research, 12, 159–170, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cohon, J. L., Multicriteria Programming: Brief Review and Application, in Design Optimization, Academi C., New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gros, J., Power Plant Siting: A Paretian Environmental Approach, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 34, 281–282, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Evans, G. W., Morin, T. L., and Moskowitz, H., Multiple Objectives and Uncertainty in Long Range Energy Generation Expansion Planning, School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, Working Paper, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zionts, S., and Deshpande, D., Energy Planning Using a Multiple Criteria Decision Method, School of Management, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, Working Paper No. 398, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Siskos, J., and Hubert, P., Multicriteria Analysis of the Impacts of Energy Alternatives: A Survey and a New Comparative Approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 13, 278–299, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Hobbs, B. F., Multiobjective Power Plant Siting Methods, ASCE Journal of the Energy Division, 106, 187–200, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Cohon, J. L., ReVelle, C. S., Current, J., Eagles, T., Eberhart, R., and Church, R., Application of a Multiobjective Facility Location Model to Power Plant Siting in a Six-State Region of the U.S., Computers and Operations Research, 7, 107–123, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Cohon, J. L., Eagles, T. W., Marguiles, T. M., and ReVelle, C. S., Population/Cost Tradeoffs for Nuclear Reactor Siting Policies, Operations Research Group, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, Report No. 81–04 (revised), 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Keeney, R. L., and Nair, K., Nuclear Siting Using Decision Analysis, Energy Policy, 5, 223–231, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Cohon, J. L., et al, Location Systems Analysis of Away-From-Reactor Spent Fuel Storage Facilities in the Eastern United States, Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, and The Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, Report No. DOE/ET/47924–6, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Engberg, D., Linke, E., Cohon, J., and ReVelle, C. S., Siting an Offshore Natural Gas Pipeline Using a Mathematical Model, National Development, June-July, 1982, pp. 93–100, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Engberg, D., Cohon, J., and ReVelle, C. S., Multiobjective Modeling for OCS Pipeline Systems, Operations Research Group, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, Report No. 83–07, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Bammi, De., and Bammi, Da., Land Use Planning: An Optimizing Model, Omega, 3, 583–594, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Bammi, De., and Bammi, Da., Development of a Comprehensive Land Use Plan by Means of Multiple Objective Mathematical Programming Models, Interfaces, 9, No. 2, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Bammi, De., Bammi, Da., and Paton, R., Urban Planning to Minimize Environmental Impact, Environment and Planning, 8, 245–259, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Barber, G., Land-Use Plan Design via Interactive Multiobjective Programming, Environment and Planning, 8, 625–636, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wright, J., ReVelle, C. S., and Cohon, J. L., A Multiobjective Integer Programming Model for the Land Acquisition Problem, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 13, 31–53, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Gilbert, K. C., Holmes, D. D., and Rosenthal, R. E., A Multiobjective Discrete Optimization Model for Land Allocation, Management Science, 31, 1509–1522, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Steuer, R., and Schüler, A. T., An Interactive Multiple-Objective Linear Programming Approach to a Problem in Forest Management, Operations Research, 26, 254–269, 1978.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. Allen, J. C., Multiobjective Regional Forest Planning Using the Noninferior Sets Estimation (NISE) Method in Tanzania and the United States, Forest Science, 32, 517–533, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Mattheiss, T. H., and Land, S. B., A Tree Breeding Strategy Based on Multiple Objective Linear Programming, Interfaces, 14, 96–104, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Seo, F., and Sakawa, M., A Methodology for Environmental Systems Management: Dynamic Application of the Nested Lagrangian Multiplier Method, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-9, No. 12, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kitabataka, Y., Miyazaki, T., and Takahashi, M., Regional Multiobjective Planning of Water Supply and the Disposal of Residuals with Due Regard to Intraregional Population Distribution, Environment and Planning, 12, 627–648, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Ridgley, M. A., Water and Urban Land Use Planning in the Developing World: A Linked Simulation—Multiobjective Approach, Environment and Planning, 11, 229–242, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. van Delft, A., and Nijkamp, P., A Multiobjective Decision Model for Regional Development, Environmental Quality Control and Industrial Land Use, Department of Economics, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Research Memorandum No. 31, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Hafkamp, W. A., and Nijkamp, P., Multiobjective Modeling for Economic-Environmental Policies, Department of Economics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Research Memorandum No. 7905, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Hafkamp, W. A., Economic-Environmental Modeling in a National-Regional System, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Spronk, J., and Veeneklaas, F., A Feasibility Study of Economic and Environmental Scenarios by Means of Interactive Multiple Goal Programming, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 13, 141–160, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohon, J.L., Scavone, G., Solanki, R. (1988). Multicriterion Optimization in Resources Planning. In: Stadler, W. (eds) Multicriteria Optimization in Engineering and in the Sciences. Mathematical Concepts and Methods in Science and Engineering, vol 37. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3734-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3734-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3736-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3734-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics