Advertisement

Critical Frameworks for Building Evaluation: Total Building Performance, Systems Integration, and Levels of Measurement and Assessment

  • Vivian Loftness
  • Volker Hartkopf
  • Peter Mill

Abstract

Although there has been heated discussion over the past few years about the need for both objective and subjective field evaluation methods, there has been very little discussion about the need to complete those field evaluations in all performance areas simultaneously. One possible explanation of this void might be the difficulty that the design community has in defining total building performance, much less establishing limits of acceptability and testing for them. Notwithstanding, there have been some collective attempts at the definition of total building performance by the National Bureau of Standards (NBS, 1972), the International Standards Organization (ISO, 1972), and the Centre Internationale de Batîment (OB, 1982). The authors of this chapter have built on these efforts, to develop a more manageable yet comprehensive list of six performance mandates for the built environment: spatial quality, thermal quality, acoustic quality, visual quality, air quality, and long-term building integrity against degradation (figure 1) (Hartkopf, Lof tness, Mill, 1983).

Keywords

Visual Quality Field Evaluation Fire Safety International Standard Organization Building System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Architectural and Building Science Directorate, Public Works Canada, working document: Total Building Performance, Hartkopf, Loftness, Mill 1982–1986.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchere, G., 1972, The Notion of Performance in Building: Building Requirements, Proceedings from Performance Concept in Buildings1972, National Bureau of Standards, NBS 361.Google Scholar
  3. Building Research Advisory Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, 1985, Building Diagnostics: A Conceptual Framework. Google Scholar
  4. Building Research Advisory Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, 1988, Electronically Enhanced Office Buildings. Google Scholar
  5. Centre Internationale de Batîment (CIB), 1982, Publication 64, Working with the Performance Approach in Building.Google Scholar
  6. Hartkopf, V., Loftness, V., Mill, P., 1985, Integration for Performance, Chapter 5, The Building Systems Integration Handbook, R. Rush, J. Wiley (Eds.) AIA.Google Scholar
  7. Hartkopf, V. Loftness, V., Mill, P., 1983, The Concept of Total Building Performance and Building Diagnostics, ASTM E6.24, Conference Proceedings1983, Bal Harbor, Florida.Google Scholar
  8. International Standards Organization (ISO), 1972, Performance Standards in Buildings, ISO/TC 59.Google Scholar
  9. Loftness, V., and Hartkopf, V., 1988, Architecture for Art’s Sake: Vantage Point Evaluation of Museum Performance for Future Design, National Endowment for the Arts Grant Publication, Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
  10. Mill, P., 1981, International Building Thermographic Training Course, Public Works Canada.Google Scholar
  11. National Bureau of Standards, 1972, Proceedings from The Performance Concept in Buildings 1972, NBS 361.Google Scholar
  12. R. Lueder (Ed.), 1986, The Ergonomic Payoff: Designing the Electronic Office, Nichols Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Rubin, A., 1980, Building for People: Behavioral Research Approaches and Directions, Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards SPS474.Google Scholar
  14. Public Works Canada, 1981, The Project Delivery System.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vivian Loftness
    • 1
  • Volker Hartkopf
    • 1
  • Peter Mill
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Building Performance and Diagnostics, Department of ArchitectureCarnegie-Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations