Wheat Growth and Modelling: An Introduction

Part of the NATO ASI Science book series (NSSA, volume 86)

Abstract

Over the last twenty years there has been a tremendous growth of interest in crop models. This shows in the number of published models (for reference to some, see Legg, 1981; Baker, 1979) also in the increasing complexity of the models and the range of problems to which they are being applied. For the cotton crop, for example, Baker (1979) refers to four groups developing simulation models, and there are others. Many of these models contain routines defining upwards of eight plant, soil or atmospheric processes, and these models have been applied to such diverse problems as assessing the feasibility of various genetic changes to cotton (Landivar et al., 1983) and studying the effects of insect damage (Wallach, 1980). Elements of crop growth simulation nave even been incorporated into a computer-based pest management scheme (Ives et al., 1984).

Keywords

Photosynthesis Wallach 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, D. N., 1979, Simulation for research and crop management, in: “World Soybean Research Conference II: Proceedings”. F. T. Corbin, ed., Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  2. Ives, P. M., Wilson, L. T., Cull, P. O., Palmer, W. A., Haywood, C., Thomson, N. J., Hearn, A. B., and Wilson, A. G. L., 1984, Field use of SIRATAC: an Australian computer-based pest management system for cotton, Prot. Ecol., 6:1.Google Scholar
  3. Landivar, J. A., Baker, D. N., and Jenkins, J. N., 1983, Application of GOSSYM to genetic feasibility studies. II Analysis of increasing photosynthesis, specific leaf weight and longevity of leaves in cotton, Crop Sci., 23:504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lang, A., and Thorpe, M. R., 1983, Analysing partitioning in plants, Pl. Cell Environ., 6:267.Google Scholar
  5. Legg, B. J., 1981, Aerial environment and crop growth, in: “Mathematics and Plant Physiology”, D. A. Rose and D. A. Charles-Edwards, eds., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  6. Monteith, J. L., and Elston, J. F., 1971, Microclimatology and crop production, in: “Potential Crop Production, A Case Study”, P. F. Wareing and J. P. Cooper, eds., Tieinemann, London.Google Scholar
  7. Murray, J. D., 1981, Introductory remarks, Phil. Trans. R. Soc, Ser. B, 295:427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Passioura, J. B., 1973, Sense and nonsense in crop simulation, J. Aust. Inst. agric. Sci., 39:181.Google Scholar
  9. Penning de Vries, F. W. T., 1982, Phases of development of models, in: “Simulation of Plant Growth and Crop Production”, F. W. T. Penning de Vries and H. H. van Laar, eds., Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  10. Rijsdijk, F. H., Rabbinge, R., and Zadoks, J. C., 1981, A system approach to supervised control of pests and diseases of wheat in the Netherlands, in: “Proceedings of the IXth International Congress of Plant Pathology”, Washington.Google Scholar
  11. Wallach, D., 1980, An empirical mathematical model of a cotton crop subjected to damage, Field Crop Res., 3:7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Day
    • 1
  1. 1.Rothamsted Experimental StationHarpendenUK

Personalised recommendations