The Role of Implicit Communication in Therapist Self-Disclosure

  • Jonathan M. Jackson

Abstract

We may begin by distinguishing between two different levels of therapist self-disclosure in psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy. One is a surface or manifest level, and it refers to facts, personal data, conscious experiences of the therapist which he communicates in a variety of ways. The other is a deeper, less obvious kind of disclosure, and it concerns the communication of an individual’s moral and social values, ways of relating to others, mood and disposition, intellectual acuity, esthetic tastes, etc. This second set of data comprises the kinds of knowledge one has of a person by living or working on close proximity over a long period of time. Although I will turn to a discussion of the surface level of self-disclosure first, the reader may anticipate my view of the deeper disclosures. That is, that any psychoanalytically oriented treatment must eventually turn towards a consideration of the patient’s perceptions of the therapist’s deep level disclosures, and that to avoid doing so denies the importance of a major capacity of the patient and a major contribution to the therapist, reciprocal aspects of the therapeutic relationship.

Keywords

Posit Dispas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fenster, S., Phillips, S., & Rapaport. (1986). The therapist’s pregnancy: Intrusion in the analytic space. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ferenczi, S. (1988). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child: The language of tenderness and of passion. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 24, 196–206. (Originally published 1933.)Google Scholar
  3. Fromm, E. (1951). The forgotten language. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gill, M.M. (1982). Analysis of transference I: Theory and technique. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  5. Greenberg, J. (1986). Theoretical models and the analyst’s neutrality. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 22, 87–106.Google Scholar
  6. Hirsch, I. (1981). Authoritarian aspects of the therapeutic relationship. Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 105–133.Google Scholar
  7. Hoffman, I.Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 389–422.Google Scholar
  8. Jourard, S.M. (1971). The transparent self. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  9. Katz, J. (1978). A psychoanalyst’s anonymity: Fiddler behind the couch. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 42, 520–524. New York: International Universities Press.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  11. Langs, R. (1975). The therapeutic relationship and deviations in technique. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 4, 106–141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Levenson, E. (1981). Facts or fantasies: The nature of psychoanalytic data. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 17, 486–500.Google Scholar
  13. Loewald, H. (1960). On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 41, 16–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  15. Singer, E. (1971). The patient aids the analyst: Some clinical and theoretical observations. In B. Landis and E.S. Tauber (Eds.), In the name of life—Essays in honor of Erich Fromm, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  16. Stone, L. (1961). The psychoanalytic situation. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  17. Strupp, H. (1969). Psychoanalytic psychotherapy and research. In L.D. Eron and R. Callahan (Eds.). The relation of theory to practice in psychotherapy. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Tarnower, W. (1966). Extra-analytic contacts between the psychoanalyst and the patient. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 35, 399–413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Weiss, E. (1975). The effect on the transference of special events occurring during psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 56, 69–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Winnicott, D.W. (1965). Maturational processing and the facilitating environment. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan M. Jackson
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Advanced Psychological StudiesAdelphi UniversityGarden CityUSA

Personalised recommendations