Advertisement

Particle Measurement in Gas System Components: Defining a Practical Test Method

  • Ulrich H. Koch
  • Michael C. Kovach
Chapter
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

The objectives of this test program were to define a valid, practical test method to measure the cleanliness of process gas piping components and to illustrate the use of gas velocity as the basis for a cleanliness safety factor. Tests were conducted at three velocities using two particle counting methods, two valve designs, two cleaning methods, in both static and dynamic modes. A sufficient number of samples were tested to provide statistically valid results. The data show that high velocity flow tests are necessary to detect differences in high-purity cleaning methods and dynamic tests are required to evaluate valve designs. An industry standard test method for evaluation of systems and components is presented. Additional research is suggested to establish the critical velocity to remove particles of known size from a surface.

Keywords

Safety Factor Dynamic Test Viscous Sublayer Cleaning Method Valve Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.J. Miller, D.W. Cooper, H.S. Nagaraj, B.L. Owens, M.H. Peters, H.L. Wolfe, and J.J. Wu, Mechanisms of contaminant particle production, migration and adhesion, J. Vacuum Sci. Technol., 6(3). 2097–2102 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.A. Brandreth and R.E. Johnson, Removal of particulates from optical lenses, The Optical Index’s J. Ophthalmic Dispensing, 54(1). (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3a.
    A. Khilnani and D. Matsuhiro, Adhesion forces in particle removal from wafer surfaces, Microcontamination, 4(4). 28–30 (1986).Google Scholar
  4. 3b.
    K.L. Mittal, editor, “Particles on Surfaces 1: Detection, Adhesion and Removal,” Plenum Press, New York (1988).Google Scholar
  5. 3c.
    K.L. Mittal, editor, “Particles on Surfaces 2: Detection, Adhesion and Removal,” Plenum Press, New York (1989).Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    M. Corn, The adhesion of solid particles to solid surfaces. I.A review, J. Air Pollution Control Assoc, 11(11). 523–528 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 5.
    M. Corn, The adhesion of solid particles to solid surfaces, II., J. Air Pollution Control Assoc, 11(12). 566–584 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 6.
    J.A. Roberson and C.T. Crowe, “Engineering Fluid Mechanics”, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 1980.Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    R.L. Panton, “Incompressible Flow”, pp. 29-450, 561-637, 761–763, John Wiley, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    “SEMI Specifications for Gases”, SEMI Designation C3-86, Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International, Mountain View, CA, 1987.Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    W.T. McDermott, A. Schwarz, and R.C. Ockovic, Particle deposition in pressurized gas sampling systems, Proceedings Institute of Environmental Sciences, pp. 392–399, Mount Prospect, IL, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    C.E. Nowakowski and J.V. Martinez de Pinillos, In-situ monitoring of particles in gases, Proceedings Microcontamination Conference, pp. 160–176, Santa Clara, CA, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    “NC-55: Ultra-Clean Production Specification”, Rev. B, Nov. 13, 1989, Nupro Company, Willoughby, Ohio 44094.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    “NC-11: Special Cleaning and Packaging Specification”, Rev. L, Jan. 9, 1987, Nupro Company, Willoughby, Ohio 44094.Google Scholar
  15. 13a.
    T. Govers, Ph D, G. Torelli, D. Gary and C. di Giulio, Department for Analysis and Equipment Development, L’Air Liquide, Claude-Delorme Research Center, Jouy-en-Josas, France.Google Scholar
  16. 13b.
    D. Jensen, Senior Mechanical Engineer, ASM America, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, and S. Goldsmith, Director of Engineering, IBR, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  17. 14.
    “Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine The Precision of a Test Method”, ASTM Designation E691, ASTM, Philadelphia, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrich H. Koch
    • 1
  • Michael C. Kovach
    • 1
  1. 1.Nupro CompanyWilloughbyUSA

Personalised recommendations