Abstract
Stephen Ullmann (1951:161) distinguished among four juxtaposed branches of word-study: “(1) the science of names (lexicology if synchronistic, etymology if diachronistic); (2) the science of meanings (semantics); (3) the science of designations (onomasiology); (4) the science of concepts (Begriffslehre).” Although the distinction between designation and meaning, particularly as displayed in the works of German and Swiss semanticists (of the sometimes loosely as well as incorrectly called Trier-Weisgerber School) is far from consistently drawn or ever pellucid, I take it that this alterity depends on whether one’s starting point is the “name,” the “lexeme,” or, more generally, the sign, or whether it is the “concept” or, more generally, the object, i.e., the constellation of properties and relations the sign stands for. If the former, the analysis should yield a semiotic network responsive to the question: what does a given sign signify in contrast and opposition to any other sign within the same system of signs? If the latter, the analysis should reveal the sign by which a given entity is designated within a certain semiotic system. According to Ullmann, the second inquiry “is the cornerstone of Weisgerber’s structure” (ibid.), but I believe that the two questions are indissolubly complementary and, in any case, the whole enterprise critically hinges upon how the investigator parses the sign/object (aliquid/aliquo) antithesis, and what the conjunctive “stands for” (stat pro), in his judgment, entails.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sebeok, T.A. (1986). Symptom. In: I Think I Am a Verb. Topics in Contemporary Semiotics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3490-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3490-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3492-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3490-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive