Skip to main content
  • 95 Accesses

Abstract

Is there any reason why the medical world might not change? There are certainly important professors of medicine, politicians, regulatory bodies, groups of consumers, and even scientists who either disagree or are extremely uncomfortable with the vision of a technologically driven medical world as described in this book—despite the fact that any such vision is promoted and ratified by their equally important colleagues and friends. Some remain skeptical about the possibility that medicine will ever fundamentally alter. Others believe that the specter of fresh and frightening diseases will so overwhelm healthcare as to make any technological achievement immediately redundant. A number have beefs with a medical culture that is run on the basis of scientific expertise, even when it promises to be economically effective. If science is to make reasonable headway in resculpting medicine for the better, all these malcontents will have to be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The American Health Information Management Associationâ€Ĥ American Health Information Management Association, Chicago, IL, press release (24 March 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. One notorious incident in Floridaâ€Ĥ “Prank AIDS Reports Prompt Teen’s Arrest,” Chicago Tribune (1 March 1995), News section, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. In a quite separate caseâ€Ĥ Robert Davis, “Online Medical Records Raise Privacy Fears,” USA Today (22 March 1995), 1A.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Twenty-four people in Marylandâ€Ĥ Beverly Woodward, “The Computer-Based Patient Record and Confidentiality,” New England Journal of Medicine (23 November 1995), 1419–1422.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Indeed, at the end of 1995â€Ĥ Jill Callahan Dennis, “Confidentiality Bill Introduced Again,” American Health Information Management Association Newsletter: In Confidence (May/June 1995), 5; and Julie Rovner, “U.S. Bill Seeks Rules on Medical Records Privacy,” The Lancet (4 November 1995), 1217.

    Google Scholar 

  6. And the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusettsâ€Ĥ Rovner, “U.S. Bill Seeks Rules on Medical Records Privacy.”

    Google Scholar 

  7. According to the Federal Centers of Disease Controlâ€Ĥ Federal Centers of Disease Control, as cited by the Associated Press (16 January 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Laurie Garrett, in the best-sellingâ€Ĥ Laurie Garrett, The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance ( London: Virago, 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. In California, a Coca-Cola salesmanâ€Ĥ Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Newsletter (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stanford University and the Universityâ€Ĥ Alexandra Wyke, “The Genetic Alternative: A Survey of Biotechnology,’ The Economist (30 April 1988), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Genentech, the Californian biotechnology firmâ€Ĥ Wyke, “The Genetic Alternative.”

    Google Scholar 

  12. The University of Massachusettsâ€Ĥ “The Privacy Conundrum,” The Economist (29 April 1995), 128.

    Google Scholar 

  13. According to the late Carl Saganâ€Ĥ Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark ( London: Headline, 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  14. According to Joshua Lederbergâ€Ĥ Joshua Lederberg as cited in the film Outbreak (director: Wolfgang Petersen; studio: Punch Productions/Warner Bros; released 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dotted along the horizonâ€Ĥ “Hope,” The Economist (29 June 1996), 105–107.

    Google Scholar 

  16. As Professor Sagan pointed outâ€Ĥ Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Such a notion reflects a growingâ€Ĥ Dorothy Nelkin, “How DNA Is Directing Social Expectations,” The Guardian (24 August 1995), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. In 1996, lawyers for Stephen Mobleyâ€Ĥ “Convicted Killer Seeks Brain Test,” The Times (14 February 1995), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. As Robert Plomin, deputy directorâ€Ĥ Robert Plomin, “Untangling the Threads of Nature and Nuture,” MRC News (Spring 1995), 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  20. In 1995, the California legislatureâ€Ĥ Oliver Morton, “Unshackled: A Survey of Biotechnology and Genetics,” The Economist (25 February 1995), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nobel Peace Prize-winner. Joseph Rotblat, as cited in Christian Tyler, “A Life Spent Worrying over the World’s Problems,” Financial Times (14 January 1996), Weekend FT, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Consider the case of Jeremy Rifkinâ€Ĥ “Battling Biofundamentalists,” The Economist (27 June 1987), 101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Films such as The Andromeda Strainâ€Ĥ The Andromeda Strain (director: Robert Wise; studio: Universal Pictures; released 1971); and The Boys from Brazil (director: Franklin J. Schaffner; studio: Producer Circle Company; released 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A decade after the first geneticâ€Ĥ “Measuring BioAngst,” The Economist (27 June 1987), 102.

    Google Scholar 

  25. In February 1975, at a conferenceâ€Ĥ Wyke, “The Genetic Alternative.”

    Google Scholar 

  26. The feeling is, as Oliver Mortonâ€Ĥ Oliver Morton, “Unshackled: A Survey of Biotechnology and Genetics,” The Economist (25 February 1995), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Though eight months late in doing soâ€Ĥ Paul Berg and Maxine Singer, “Recombinant DNA Controversy: Twenty Years Later,” BioTechnology (13 October 1995), 1132–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  28. In 1995, it released Outbreakâ€Ĥ Outbreak (released 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  29. At the end of 1995, a coalitionâ€Ĥ Berg and Singer, “Recombinant DNA Controversy.”

    Google Scholar 

  30. On October 3, 1995, Britain’sâ€Ĥ Roger Highfield, “Cancer Screening for Test-Tube Embryos,” The Daily Telegraph (3 October 1995 ), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. This, in part, explains whyâ€Ĥ Alexandra Wyke, “Peering into 2010: A Survey of the Future of Medicine,” The Economist (19 March 1994), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Learning the dangers of germ-line therapyâ€Ĥ French Anderson, as cited in Wyke, “Peering Into 2010.”

    Google Scholar 

  33. Berg and Singer stressâ€Ĥ Berg and Singer, “Recombinant DNA Controversy.”

    Google Scholar 

  34. In 1992, the Roman Catholic Churchâ€Ĥ Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World.

    Google Scholar 

  35. In December 1993, China announced a planâ€Ĥ Wyke, “Peering into 2010.”

    Google Scholar 

  36. In March 1996, scientists from Vanderbilt Universityâ€Ĥ Jeffrey T. Holt, Marilyn E. Thompson, Csilla Szabo, Cheryl RobinsonBenion, Carlos L. Arteaga, Mary-Claire King, and Roy A. Jensen, “Growth Retardation and Tumour Inhibition by BRCAI,” Nature Genetics (12 March 1996 ), 298–302.

    Google Scholar 

  37. In 1990, 18 percent of people in countriesâ€Ĥ Barbara Beck, “All Our Tomorrows: A Survey of The Economics of Ageing,” The Economist (27 January 1996), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  38. In one article, Norman Macraeâ€Ĥ Norman Macrae, “Some Moral Dilemmas, 1993–2143,” in “The Future Surveyed,” The Economist (11 September 1993 ), 101–103.

    Google Scholar 

  39. The total pension bill for governmentsâ€Ĥ Beck, “All Our Tomorrows.”

    Google Scholar 

  40. According to Barbara Beckâ€Ĥ Beck, “All Our Tomorrows.”

    Google Scholar 

  41. A World Health Organization studyâ€Ĥ World Health Organization, as cited in Beck, “All Our Tomorrows.”

    Google Scholar 

  42. In 1973, the film Soylent Greenâ€Ĥ Soylent Green (director: Richard Feischer; studio: MGM; released 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  43. But, Norman Macrae, for one, believes thatâ€Ĥ Macrae, “Some Moral Dilemmas.”

    Google Scholar 

  44. Not even Auguste Comte was infallibleâ€Ĥ Arthur C. Clarke, Profiles of the Future ( London: Victor Gollancz, 1962 ).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yet, as Arthur C. Clarke, the doyen ofâ€Ĥ Clarke, Profiles of the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  46. But as Clarke also pointsâ€Ĥ Clarke, Profiles of the Future.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Âİ 1997 Alexandra Wyke

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wyke, A. (1997). Against Change. In: 21st-Century Miracle Medicine. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3466-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3466-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-45565-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3466-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics