Advertisement

The Curran Syndrome

  • John Deedy

Abstract

From the outset, Rome’s action against Father Charles Curran of the Catholic University of America’s faculty was difficult to fathom. On the human level, the action displayed a sorry, even cruel, insensitivity toward a man of high integrity and great personal loyalty to the church; on the bureaucratic level, it evidenced, at best, a lack of knowledge and, at worse, a contempt for the intellectual and statutory independence of American colleges and universities—particularly those that are Catholic. Curran is a theologian attached to a university with pontifical accreditation; the pontifical association is an impressive Catholic credential. But at the same time, it rendered Curran—as it would almost anyone on the Catholic University faculty—vulnerable to the displeasure of Rome, an open target to anyone with the will and in a position to invoke pontifical authority against him. Through such authority, Cardinal Ratzinger did in Father Charles Curran.

Keywords

Academic Freedom Civil Court Pastoral Letter Church Teaching Church Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Endnotes

  1. 1.
    “Where Church, Fr. Curran Differed on Theological Issues,” NC News Service story in Pittsburgh Catholic 22 Aug. 1986, 3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    “Firing Line,” transcript of program taped in New York City, 20 Nov. 1986, and telecast later on the Public Broadcasting Service, as a production of the Southern Educational Communications Association, Columbia, South Carolina. The program featured William F. Buckley, Jr., as host. The other guest, along with Father Curran, was Monsignor Eugene V. Clark, pastor of St. Agnes Church in New York City and once personal secretary to Cardinals Francis Spellman and Terence Cooke. Curran’s comment appears on page 19 of the program’s transcript.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xavier Rynne (pseudonym), “The Curran Controversy and the Vatican’s Obsession with Conformity,” Boston Globe, 24 Sept. 1986, 19.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    “Church, Fr. Curran.”Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    William V. Shannon, “Silencing a Catholic Theologian Who Dares to Dissent,” Boston Globe, 27 Aug. 1986, 15.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    John C. Bennett, “The Vatican Moves to Repress Dissent,” Christianity and Crisis, 6 Oct. 1986, 33.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joseph Berger, “Priest Is Told to Retract His Views on Sex Issues,” New York Times, 12 Mar. 1986.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    “Curran Complains against C.U. Action,” RNS story in Wanderer, St. Paul, 4 Dec. 1986, 1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Robin Toner, “Censured Priest Drops Teaching Plans for Spring,” New York Times, 16 Jan. 1987, A15.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Robert McAfee Brown, “Father Charles Curran and Canon 812,” Christian Century, 4–11 Feb. 1987, 100.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    “People vs. Authority,” Christian Century, 27 Aug.-3 Sept. 1986, 736.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    “Ex-Jesuit, Citing ‘Restrictions,’ Turns Down Archbishop’s Offer,” Wanderer, St. Paul, 25 Dec. 1986, 7.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Published by Sheed, Andrews & McMeel, Kansas City, MO, 1976.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dick Ryan, “Jesuits to Expel Rebel Gay Priest,” National Catholic Reporter, 14 Nov. 1986, 1, 6.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    “Fr. McNeill Dismissed from Jesuit Order,” Pilot, 27 Feb. 1987, 8.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jerry Filteau, “Fr. Buckley, Named to NCCB, to Be Reviewed,” NC News Service story in Catholic Free Press, Worcester, MA, 25 July 1986, 6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    David E. Anderson, “Jesuit Critic of Vatican to Get Key Doctrinal Post,” UPI story in Boston Globe, 28 Aug. 1986.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    “Canon Lawyer Critical of Rome Wins Tenure at Catholic U.,” UPI story in Boston Globe, 29 Aug. 1986, 64.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jerry Filteau, “Archbishop James Hickey: ‘No Right to Public Dissent,’ ” Pittsburgh Catholic, 23 Aug. 1986.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    “Archbishop Supports Vatican Decision,” NC News Service in Progress, Seattle, 28 Aug. 1968, 15.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    “Explanation of Curran’s, Vatican Views on Issues,” Progress, Seattle, 28 Aug. 1986, 14.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Canon T. K. A. Walsh, “The Case of Fr. Curran,” Tablet, London, 10 May 1986, 486.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    “Pope Rebukes Dissent on Sexual Issues,” New York Times, 11 Apr. 1986, A5.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    “Dissent a Risk,” NC News Service story in Catholic Free Press, Worcester, MA, 4 July 1986, 2.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Robert McClory, “Bernardin Writes Pastoral against Teaching Dissent,” National Catholic Reporter, 24 Oct. 1986, 3.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karen M. Franz, “Bishop Withdraws Imprimatur from Sex Education Book,” NC News Service story in Church World, Brunswick, ME, 4 Dec. 1986, 10.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Archbishop Rembert G. Weakland, O.S.B., “The Price of Orthodoxy,” Catholic Herald, Milwaukee, 11 Sept. 1986 and 18 Sept. 1986, p. 3 in both issues.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    Roberto Suro, “The Vatican and Dissent in America,” New York Times, 27 Sept. 1986, 9.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Joseph Berger, “Church Directive on Speakers Is Questioned,” New York Times, 6 Dec. 1986, 29. The story concerned the cover article, “Thou Shalt Not Speak,” by Monsignor Harry J. Byrne, in America magazine for 6 Dec. 1986.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    “The Curran Effect,” Commonweal, 12 Sept. 1986, 451.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Joseph Berger, “Catholic Compromise Is Reached in Dispute on Seattle Archbishop,” New York Times, 27 May 1987, 1. The three-bishop commission that worked out the agreement comprised Cardinal Joseph Bernardin of Chicago, Cardinal John O’Connor of New York, and Archbishop John Quinn of San Francisco.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Joseph Berger, “Catholics Reach Accord in Seattle Case,” New York Times, 31 May 1987, Week in Review section, 30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John Deedy 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Deedy
    • 1
  1. 1.RockportUSA

Personalised recommendations