Skip to main content

Maternity care; a public concern

  • Chapter
Book cover Safer Childbirth?
  • 77 Accesses

Abstract

Until the foundation in the later 18th century of the charitable lying-in hospitals and dispensaries for the relief of the sick poor, maternity care, like medical care in general in Britain, was a matter only of personal concern. The concept of public health began to develop in the 19th century when the important influence on it of the physical environment, particularly in the rapidly growing towns, was coming to be realized. Enlightened policies were implemented by sanitary engineers for the provision of uncontaminated water supplies and the safe removal of sewage. These ambitious reforms were soon rewarded by striking reductions in deaths from cholera, typhoid and other infections. The extent of these reductions could be measured, for since 1837 in England and Wales and 1855 in Scotland the State had made the registration of deaths compulsory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Interdepartmental Committee on the Physical Deterioraration of the Population (1904) Report, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Local Government Board (1910) Report for1909–10 (supplement on infant and child mortality), HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Local Government Board (1913) Report for 1912, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Local Government Board (1914) Report for 1913, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Local Government Board (1915) Report for1914–15 (supplement), HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Local Government Board (1917) Report for 1915–16, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Local Government Board (1918) Report for 1917–18, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Medical Officer of the Local Government Board (1915) Memorandum on Health Visiting and on Maternity and Child Welfare Centres, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, J.M., Ministry of Health (1923) Notes on the Arrangements for Teaching Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the Medical Schools, Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects No. 15, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell, J.M., Ministry of Health (1923) The Training of Midwives, Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects No. 21, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell, J.M., Ministry of Health (1927) The Protection of Motherhood, Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects No. 48, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Campbell, J.M., Ministry of Health (1929) Infant Mortality, Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects No. 55, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell, J.M., Cameron, I.D. and Jones, D.M., Ministry of Health (1932) High Maternal Mortality in Certain Areas, Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects No. 68, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell, J.M. Ministry of Health (1924) Maternal Mortality, Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects No. 25, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw, W.F. (1954) Twenty-five years. The Story of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 1929–1954, Churchill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ministry of Health (1930) Interim Report of the Departmental Committee on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity, Chairman Sir George Newman, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ministry of Health (1932) Final Report of the Departmental Committee on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity, Chairman Sir George Newman, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Towler, J. and Bramall, J. (1986) Midwives in History and Society, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maternity in Great Britain (Survey undertaken by a Joint Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Population Investigation Committee) (1946) Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gillie, A.K. (1956) in Proceedings of a Conference on General Practitioner Obstetrics, College of General Practitioners, London, pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ministry of Health (1956) Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Cost of the National Health Service, Chairman, C. Guilleband, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ministry of Health (1959) Report of the Maternity Services Committee, Chairman, The Earl of Cranbrook, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ministry of Health (1970) Domiciliary Midwifery and Maternity Bed Needs: the Report of the Standing Maternity and Midwifery Advisory Committee, Sub-committee Chairman, J. Peel, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Department of Health and Social Security (1971) Report of the Expert Group on Special Care for Babies, Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects No. 127, Chairman, W. Sheldon, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Department of Health and Social Security (1974) Report of the Working Party on the Prevention of Early Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity, Chairman, T. Oppé, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Department of Health and Social Security (1976) Fit for the Future: the Report of the Committee on Child Health Services, Chairman, D. Court, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Richards, M.P.M. (1978) A place of safety? An examination of the risks of hospital delivery in The Place of Birth (eds S. Kitzinger and J. Davis), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tew, M. (1980) Facts not assertions of belief. Health Soc. Sew. J., 12 September, 1194–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sinclair, J., Torrance, G., Boyle, M. et al. (1981) Evaluation of neonatal-intensive-care programs. N. Engl. J. Med., 305, 489–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Royal College of Physicians of London (1988) Medical Care of the Newborn in England and Wales, Royal College of Physicians of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  31. House of Commons Social Services Committee (1980) Perinatal and Neonatal Mortality; Second Report from the Social Services Committee, 1979–80, Chairwoman, R. Short, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Banta, D. and Thacker, S. (1979) Electronic fetal monitoring: is it of benefit? Birth and the Family Journal, 6, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Prentice, A. and Lind, T. (1987) Fetal heart rate monitoring during labour — too frequent intervention, too little benefit? Lancet, ii, 1375–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Short, R. (1980) No evidence from Marjorie Tew. Health and Soc. Sew. J., letter, 28 November, 1521.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tew, M. (1980) Misuse of statistics. Health Soc. Sen;. J., letter, 12 December, 1596.

    Google Scholar 

  36. House of Commons Social Services Committee (1984) Perinatal and Neonatal Mortality Report: Follow-up; Third Report from the Social Services Committee, 1983–84, Chairwoman, R. Short, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Association of Anaesthetists (1987) Anaesthetic Services for Obstetrics-a Place for the Future, London.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Garcia, J. (1987) The role and structure of the Maternity Services Liaison Committees. Health Trends, 1, 19, 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Maternity Services Advisory Committee (1984) Maternity Care in Action. Part II Care During Childbirth (Intrapartum care); A Guide to Good Practice and a Plan for Action, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Enkin, M. and Chalmers, I. (eds) (1982) Effectiveness and Satisfaction in Antenatal care, William Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Horvath, M. (1985) Place of birth and perinatal mortality, unpublished research, Worlingworth, Woodbridge, Suffolk.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stilwell, J.A. (1979) Relative costs of home and hospital confinements. Br. Med. J., 2, 257–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gray, A. and Steele, R. (1981) The economics of specialist and general practitioner maternity units. J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract., 31, 586–92.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Oakley, A. (1984) The Captured Womb, Blackwell, Oxford, p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  45. National League for Health, Maternity and Child Welfare (1915) Annual Report, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  46. National Childbirth Trust (1986) Facing the Future: Annual Report for 1986, London, pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Brownlie, A. (1986) National Childbirth Trust Annual Report for 1986, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Willington, S. (1985) Origins of A.I.M.S. Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services Quarterly Journal, conference bulletin.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ministry of Health (1961) Human Relations in Obstetrics, Central Health Services Council, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stewart, D. (1981) The Five Standards for Safe Childbearing, Napsac Reproductions, Marble Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Homebirth Australia Newsletter, Registered Australia Post Publication No. NBH6774 (quarterly).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Savage, W. (1986) A Savage Enquiry, Virago Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dyer, C. (1988) The Case of the Other Wendy Savage. Br. Med. J., 297(2), 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Supreme Court of Victoria, Melbourne, before the Honourable Mr Justice Fullagar, between John Stevenson and the Medical Board of Victoria, Judgment, 27 June 1984 (Causes Jurisdiction No. M25 of 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Robinson, J. (1982) Guilty: the crime of giving birth. Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services Quarterly Journal, Autumn, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  56. The Court Press (1982) Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services Quarterly Journal, Autumn, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lady Pickard (1988) The case of July Rosser: Hearing before the Professional Conduct Committee of the United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting. Association of Radical Midwives Magazine, 39, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Flint, C. (1989) Professional conduct machinery — some necessary changes. Association of Radical Midwives Magazine, 40, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sallomi, P., Pallow-Fleury, A. and McMahon, P. (1983) Midwifery and the law. Mothering, special edn, Mothering Publications Inc., Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jakel-Kuchel, J. (1987) Homebirth in the courts. Homebirth Australia, Newsletter, 15, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kolder, V., Gallagher, J. and Parsons, M. (1987) Court-ordered obstetrical interventions. N. Engl. J. Med., 316, 1192–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 M. Tew

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tew, M. (1990). Maternity care; a public concern. In: Safer Childbirth?. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2975-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2975-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-33740-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2975-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics