Assessing costs and benefits

  • Martin Knapp
  • Jim Mansell


For most of the period in which community-based services have been proposed as complete alternatives to institutional care, the main focus of debate has been their feasibility. With the widespread development of supported housing in the 1980s, attention has been concentrated on people with special needs, and particularly people with challenging behaviour. Even here, the development of working models of supported housing has gone a long way to demonstrate that, given adequate commitment and investment of time and effort, these services are a feasible and desirable alternative to hospital care (Chapters 5 and 6).


Community Service Community Care Challenging Behaviour Audit Commission Correct Attribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, C. and Beecham, J. (1993) Costing services: Ideals and reality, in Costing Community Care: Theory and Practice (eds A. Netten and J. Beecham). Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar
  2. Audit Commission (1986) Making a Reality of Community Care. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  3. Conroy, J.W. and Bradley V.T. (1985) The Pennhurst Longitudinal Study: A Report of Five Years of Research and Analysis. Philadelphia, PA, and Boston, MA: Temple University Developmental Disabilities Centre and Human Services Research Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Conroy, J.W. and Feinstein, C.S. (1990) A new way of thinking about quality, in Quality Assurance for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities (eds V. Bradley and H. Bersani). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, pp. 263–278.Google Scholar
  5. Dalley, G. (1988) Ideologies of Caring: Rethinking Community and Collectivism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Griffiths, R. (1988) Community Care: Agenda for Action. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  7. Hughes, H.M. and Mansell, J. (1990) Consultation to Camberwell Health Authority Learning Disabilities Care Group: Evaluation Report. Canterbury: Centre for the Applied Psychology of Social Care, University of Kent.Google Scholar
  8. Johnes, G. and Haycox, A. (1986) Cost structures in a large hospital for the mentally handicapped. Social Science and Medicine, 22, 605–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Knapp, M.R.J. (1993) The basic principles of applied costs research, in Costing Community Care: Theory and Practice (eds A. Netten and J. Beecham). Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
  10. Knapp, M.R.J. and Beecham, J. (1990) Costing mental health services. Psychological Medicine, 20, 893–908.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knapp, M.R.J., Cambridge, P., Thomason, C., Beecham, J., Allen, C. and Darton, R.A. (1992) Care in the Community: Challenge and Demonstration. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Korman, N. and Glennerster, H. (1990) Hospital Closure. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Oliver, C., Murphy, G. and Corbett, J. (1987) Self-injurious behaviour in people with mental handicap: a total population study. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 31, 147–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wright, K. and Haycox, A. (1984) Public sector costs of caring for mentally handicapped persons in a large hospital. Discussion Paper 1. York: Institute for Research in the Social Sciences/Centre for Health Economics, University of York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Knapp
  • Jim Mansell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations