A national service: coma to community
Until recently, the fate of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) was gloomy. It was assumed, that once they survived the acute state, nothing more could be done, despite their normal estimated life expectancy, especially in cases of penetrating brain lesions [1–4] uncomplicated by post-traumatic epilepsy. Conroy and Kraus  summarized their experience by stating that ‘people [with TBI] who are discharged alive from the hospital have survival comparable to that of the population they came from’.
KeywordsTraumatic Brain Injury Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Glasgow Outcome Scale Traumatic Brain Injury Patient Vocational Rehabilitation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 14.Melamed S, Stern JM, Rahmani L et al. Work congruence, behaviourial pathology and rehabilitation status of severe craniocerebral injury. In: Lahav M, ed. Psychological Research in Rehabilitation. Tel-Aviv: Ministry of Defence Publishing House, 1982: pp 59–74.Google Scholar
- 15.Kravetz S. Rehabilitation need and status: substance, structure and process. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin, 1973.Google Scholar
- 16.The Aftercare of Brain Injury with emphasis on inter-professional co-operation and guidelines for the future. Meeting held at The Royal College of Physicians. 13 November 1987.Google Scholar
- 17.Lezak MD. Psychological implications of traumatic brain damage of the patient’s family. Rehabilitation Psychology 1986; 31: 241–250.Google Scholar
- 21.Groswasser Z, Stern JM. Dynamic Cognitive and Behavioural Changes During the Rehabilitation Process of Traumatic Brain Injury. IRMA Monograph Series. Israel: International Rehabilitation Medical Association, 1989.Google Scholar
- 24.Najenson T, Rahmani R, Elazar B et al. An elementary cognitive assessment and treatment of the craniocerebral injured patient. In: Edelstein BA, Couture EG, eds. Behavioural Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Traumatically Brain-Damaged. New York: Plenum Press, 1984: pp 313–338.Google Scholar
- 26.Evyatar A, Stern MJ, Shem-Tov M et al. Hypothesis forming and computerized cognitive therapy. In: Wood R, Fussy I, eds. Cognitive Rehabilitation in Perspective. London: Taylor & Francis, 1990: pp 147–163.Google Scholar
- 27.Johnson R. Return to work after severe head injury International Rehabilitation Studies 1987; 9: 44–49.Google Scholar
- 28.Katz S, Galatzer A, Kravetz S. The physical, psycho-social and vocational effectiveness of a sheltered workshop for brain-damaged war veterans. In: Lahav M, ed. Psychological Research in Rehabilitation. Tel-Aviv: Ministry of Defence Publishing House, 1982: pp 75–85.Google Scholar