A national service: coma to community

  • Zeev Groswasser


Until recently, the fate of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) was gloomy. It was assumed, that once they survived the acute state, nothing more could be done, despite their normal estimated life expectancy, especially in cases of penetrating brain lesions [1–4] uncomplicated by post-traumatic epilepsy. Conroy and Kraus [4] summarized their experience by stating that ‘people [with TBI] who are discharged alive from the hospital have survival comparable to that of the population they came from’.


Traumatic Brain Injury Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Glasgow Outcome Scale Traumatic Brain Injury Patient Vocational Rehabilitation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Weiss GH, Caveness WF, Einsiedel-Lechtape H et al. Life expectancy and causes of death in a group of head-injured veterans of World War I. Archives of Neurology 1982; 39: 741–743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rish BL, Daniel Dillon J, Weiss GH. Mortality following penetrating craniocerebral injury. An analysis of death of the Vietnam Head Injury Registry population. Journal of Neurosurgery 1983; 59: 775–780.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corkin S, Sullivan EV, Carr FA. Prognostic factors for life expectancy after penetrating head injury. Archives of Neurology 1984; 41: 975–977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conroy C, Kraus JF. Survival after brain injury. Cause of death, length of survival, and prognostic variables in a cohort of brain-injured people. Neuroepidemiology 1988; 7: 13–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Najenson T, Mendelson L, Schechter I et al. (1974) Rehabilitation after severe head injury. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1974; 6: 5–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Najenson T, Groswasser Z, Stern JM et al. Prognostic factors in rehabilitation after severe head injury. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1975; 7: 101–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Groswasser Z, Mendelson L, Stern JM et al. Re-evaluation of prognostic parameters in rehabilitation after severe head injury. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1977; 9: 147–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Najenson T, Groswasser Z, Mendelson L et al. Rehabilitation outcome of brain damaged patients after severe head injury. International Rehabilitation Medicine 1980; 2: 17–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Groswasser Z, Cohen M, Blankstein E. Polytrauma associated with traumatic brain injury: incidence, nature and impact on rehabilitation outcome. Brain Injury 1990; 4: 161–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldstein M. Traumatic brain injury: a silent epidemic. Annals of Neurology 1990; 27: 327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1975; 1: 480–484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rao N, Rosenthal M, Cronin-Stubb D et al. Return to work after rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1990; 4: 49–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melamed S, Stern JM, Rahmani L et al. Work congruence, behaviourial pathology and rehabilitation status of severe craniocerebral injury. In: Lahav M, ed. Psychological Research in Rehabilitation. Tel-Aviv: Ministry of Defence Publishing House, 1982: pp 59–74.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kravetz S. Rehabilitation need and status: substance, structure and process. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin, 1973.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Aftercare of Brain Injury with emphasis on inter-professional co-operation and guidelines for the future. Meeting held at The Royal College of Physicians. 13 November 1987.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lezak MD. Psychological implications of traumatic brain damage of the patient’s family. Rehabilitation Psychology 1986; 31: 241–250.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stanbrook M, Moore AD, Deviane et al. Effects of mild, moderate and severe head injury on long-term vocational status. Brain Injury 1990; 4: 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Groswasser Z, Sazbon L. Outcome of 134 patients with prolonged posttraumatic unawareness. II. Functional outcome of 72 patients recovering consciousness. Journal of Neurosurgery 1990; 72: 81–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reider-Groswasser I, Cohen M, Costeff H et al. Late CT findings in brain trauma: relationship to cognitive and behavioural sequelae and to vocational outcome. American Journal of Roentgenology 1993; 160: 147–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Groswasser Z, Stern JM. Dynamic Cognitive and Behavioural Changes During the Rehabilitation Process of Traumatic Brain Injury. IRMA Monograph Series. Israel: International Rehabilitation Medical Association, 1989.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mackay LE, Bernstein BA, Chapman PE et al. Early intervention in severe head injury: long-term benefits of formalized program. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1992; 73: 635–641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stern JM, Melamed S, Silberg S et al. Behaviourial disturbances as an expression of severity of cerebral damage. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1985; Supp 12: 36–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Najenson T, Rahmani R, Elazar B et al. An elementary cognitive assessment and treatment of the craniocerebral injured patient. In: Edelstein BA, Couture EG, eds. Behavioural Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Traumatically Brain-Damaged. New York: Plenum Press, 1984: pp 313–338.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katz N, Itzkovich M, Averbuch S et al. Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) Battery for brain injured patients: reliability and validity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1989; 43: 184–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Evyatar A, Stern MJ, Shem-Tov M et al. Hypothesis forming and computerized cognitive therapy. In: Wood R, Fussy I, eds. Cognitive Rehabilitation in Perspective. London: Taylor & Francis, 1990: pp 147–163.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johnson R. Return to work after severe head injury International Rehabilitation Studies 1987; 9: 44–49.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Katz S, Galatzer A, Kravetz S. The physical, psycho-social and vocational effectiveness of a sheltered workshop for brain-damaged war veterans. In: Lahav M, ed. Psychological Research in Rehabilitation. Tel-Aviv: Ministry of Defence Publishing House, 1982: pp 75–85.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Livingstone MG, Brooks ND, Bond M. Three months after head injury: psychiatric and social impact on relatives. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 870–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brooks ND, Campsie L, Symington C et al. The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: a relative’s view. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1986; 49: 764–770.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stern JM, Groswasser Z, Alis R et al. Day centre experience in rehabilitation of craniocerebral injured patients. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1985; Supp 12: 53–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Melamed S, Groswasser Z, Stern MJ. Acceptance of disability, work involvement and subjective rehabilitation status of traumatic brain injured (TBI) patients. Brain Injury 1992; 6: 233–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zeev Groswasser

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations