Advertisement

A score of zero?

Assessment of functional skills after severe head injury
  • Agnes Shiel
  • Sandra Horn
  • Martin Watson
  • Lindsay McLellan
  • Barbara Wilson

Abstract

The patient with a head injury may have a variety of impairments which interact to cause functional limitation. There may be deficits in everyday skills, ranging from self-care tasks to those tasks which require differing degrees of alertness, information processing, planning and execution. Even when the patient is capable of using these skills independently of each other, e.g. of planning an activity without having to execute it, head-injured patients are frequently unable to integrate skills, that is to say to select and use the skills sequentially to solve real-life problems. The sequelae of head injury were described in Chapter 9.

Keywords

Head Injury Functional Assessment Barthel Index Severe Head Injury Functional Skill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Levin HS, Benton AL, Grossmann RG. Neurobehavioural Consequences of Head Injury. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965; 14: 61–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duckworth D. The measurement of disability by means of summed ADL indices. International Rehabilitation Medicine 1980; 2: 194–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Granger CV. Health accounting — functional assessment of the long-term patient. In: Krusens’ Handbook of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1990, pp 270–284.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brooks DN, Campsie LM, Symington C et al. The effects of severe head injury upon patients and relatives within seven years of injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1987; 2: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson BA, Shiel A, Watson M et al. Monitoring behaviour during coma and post traumatic amnesia. In: Progress in the Rehabilitation of Brain Injured People. Boston, MA: Kluver Academic Publishers, in press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roth E, Davidoff G, Haugton J et al. Functional assessment in spinal cord injury: a comparison of the modified Barthel Index and the ‘adapted’ Functional Independence Measure. Clinical Rehabilitation 1990; 4: 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bluma S, Shearer M, Frohman A et al. Portage Guide to Early Education. Wisconsin: Co-operative Educational Service Education, 1976.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson BA. Adapting ‘Portage’ for Neurological Patients. International Rehabilitation Medicine 1985; 7: 6–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shackleton Bailey MJ, Pidock BE. Hampshire Assessment for Living with Others. Winchester: Hampshire Social Services, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Felce D, Jenkins J, Mansell J. Bereweeke Skills Teaching System, Winchester: Hampshire Social Services, 1983.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Richardson JTE. Outcome, recovery and rehabilitation. In: Clinical and Neuropsychological Aspects of Closed Head Injury. London: Taylor & Francis, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson BA. Future directions in rehabilitation of brain injured people. In: Christensen AL, Uzell BP, eds. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agnes Shiel
  • Sandra Horn
  • Martin Watson
  • Lindsay McLellan
  • Barbara Wilson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations