Advertisement

Mental Imagery pp 121-128 | Cite as

Imagined Interactions, Imagery, and Mindfulness/Mindlessness

  • James M. Honeycutt

Abstract

People sometimes have imagined interactions in which they imagine talking with someone. For example, before entering a job interview, the interviewee may rehearse in his/her mind what the interviewer might ask and how the self will respond. After an argument with a romantic partner, the self may replay the encounter and feel despair at not having said various things that are currently in one’s mind. In the first scenario, a proactive imagined interaction has occurred while a retroactive imagined interaction has occurred in the second. It is also possible that the retroactive encounter in the second scenario acts as preinteraction stimulus for the next encounter with the romantic partner. Thus, the conflict picks up where it left off. These examples reflect what has previously been referred to as imagined interactions (Honeycutt, 1990; Honeycutt, Edwards, and Zagacki, 1989–90; Honeycutt, Zagacki, and Edwards,1989).

Keywords

Romantic Partner Contingency Plan Procedural Record Mindful State Relational Partner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, R. P. (1976). Script processing in attitude formation and decision-making. In Cognition and Social Behavior, J. S. Carroll and J. W. Payne (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, C. R. (in press). A plan-based approach to strategic communication. In Cognitive Bases of Interpersonal Communication,D. E. Hewes (ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Caughey, J. L. (1984). Imaginary Social Worlds. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  4. Daly, J. A., Vangelisti, A., and Daughton, S. M. (1987). The nature and correlates of conversational sensitivity. Human Communication Research, 14, 167–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, R., Honeycutt, J. M., and Zagacki, K. S. (1988). Imagined interaction as an element of social cognition, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edwards, R., Honeycutt, J. M., and Zagacki, K. S. (1989). Gender differences in imagined interactions. Sex Roles, 21, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fiske, S. T. and Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social Cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  8. Folkes, V. S. (1985). Mindlessness or mindfulness: A partial replication and extension of Langer, Blank, and Chanowitz. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 600–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greene, J. O. (1984). A cognitive approach to human communication: An action-assembly theory. Communication Monographs, 51, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton, M. and Hunter, J. (1988). PACKET 1.0, A multiple groups confirmatory factor analysis routine for microcomputers. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticutt.Google Scholar
  11. Honeycutt, J. M. (1989a). A pilot analysis of imagined interaction accounts in the elderly. In Louisiana: Health and the elderly, R. Marks and J. Padgett (eds). New Orleans, LA: Pan American Life Center.Google Scholar
  12. Honeycutt, J. M. (1989b). Transferrence in everyday life: Imagined interactions, message planning, and emotional affect. Seminar paper presented at the annual Speech Communication Association Conference, San Francisco, November.Google Scholar
  13. Honeycutt, J. M. (1990). A functional analysis of imagined interaction activity in everyday life. In Imagery: Current Perspectives, J. E. Shorr, P. Robin, J. A. Connelia, and M. Wolpin (eds.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  14. Honeycutt, J. M., Zagacki, K. S., and Edwards, R., 1989, Intrapersonal communication and imagined interactions. In Readings in Intrapersonal Communication, C. Roberts and K. Watson (eds.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Honeycutt, J. M., Edwards, R., and Zagacki, K. S. (1989–1990). Using imagined interaction features to predict measures of self-awareness: Loneliness, locus of control, self-dominance, and emotional intensity. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 17–31.Google Scholar
  16. Kihlstrom, J. F. and Cantor, N. (1984). Mental representations of self. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol., 17, L. Berkowtiz (ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Klinger, E. (1978). Modes of normal conscious flow. In The Stream of Consciousness: Scientific Investigations into the Flow of Human Experience, K. S. Pope and J. L. Singer (eds.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  18. Klinger, E. (1981). The central place of imagery in human functioning. In Imagery: Concepts, Results, and Application, Vol. 2, E. Klinger (ed.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  19. Klinger, E. (1987). What people think about and when they think it. Paper presented at the annual American Psychological Association Conference, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Klos, D. S. and Singer, J. L. (1981). Determinants of the adolescent’s ongoing thought following simulated parental confrontations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 975–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Langer, E. J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In New Directions in Attribution Research, Vol. 2, J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, and R. F. Kidd (eds.). Hilldfslr, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  23. Langer, E. J., Blank, A., and Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of placebic information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Langer, E. J., Chanowitz, B., and Blank, A. (1985). Mindlessness-mindfulness in perspective: A reply to Valerie Folkes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 605–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Langer, E. J., and Piper, A. I. (1987). The prevention of mindlessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Norman, D. A. (1980). Copycat science or does the mind really work by table look-up? In Perception and production of fluent speech, R. A. Cole (ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. O’Keefe, B. J. (1988). The logic of message design: Individual differences in reasoning about communication. Communication Monographs, 55, 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Keefe, B. J. (1990). The logic of regulative communication: Understanding the rationality of message designs. In Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages, J. P. Dillard (ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Roloff, M. E. (1989). Issue schema and mindless processing of persuasive messages: Much ado about nothing? In Intrapersonal Communication Processes, C. V. Roberts and K. W. Watson (eds.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Rosenblatt, P. and Meyer, C. (1986). Imagined interactions and the family Family Relations, 35, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic Memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schultz, K. D. (1978). Imagery and the control of depression. In The Power of Human Imagination, J. L. Singer and K. S. Pope (eds.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  34. Sherman, S. J. and Corty, E. (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In Handbook of Social Cognition, Vol. 1, R. S. Wyer, Jr. and T. K. Srull (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Singer, J. L. (1985). Private experience and public action: The study of ongoing thought. Paper read at the Henry A. Murray Lecture, Symposium on Personality, Michigan State University, East Lansing Michigan.Google Scholar
  36. Singer, J. L. (1987). Reinterpreting the transference. In Reasoning, Inference and Judgement in Clinical Psychology, D. C. Turk and P. Salovey (eds.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Zagacki, K. S., Edwards, R., and Honeycutt, J. M. (1988). Imagined interactions, social cognition and intrapersonal communication: Elaboration of a theoretical construct. Paper presented at the annual Speech Communication Association Convention, New Orleans, November.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • James M. Honeycutt
    • 1
  1. 1.Center of Imagined Interaction Research Department of Speech CommunicationLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations