Advertisement

Site Structure, Kinship, and Sharing in Aboriginal Australia

Implications for Archaeology
  • Rob Gargett
  • Brian Hayden
Part of the Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology book series (IDCA)

Abstract

Interactions between and among individuals in hunter-gatherer societies contribute fundamentally to the adaptiveness of the culture. Through the analysis of site structure (the distribution on the landscape of habitations, activity areas, refuse areas, and other features), it is possible to make inferences about past social interaction, thus enabling archaeology to make a significant contribution to the study of prehistoric cultural adaptations and dynamics.

Keywords

Close Spacing Site Structure Western Desert Residential Unit Primary Link 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burch, E. S., 1975, Eskimo Kinsmen: Changing Family Relationships in Northwest Alaska, American Ethnological Society, Monograph 59, West Publishing Co., St Paul.Google Scholar
  2. Cahen, D., Keeley, L., and Van Noten, F., 1979, Stone Tools, Tool Kits, and Human Behavior in Prehistory, Current Anthropology 20:661–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gould, R. A., 1968, Living Archaeology: The Ngatatjara of Western Australia, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 24:101–122.Google Scholar
  4. Gould, R. A., and Yellen, J. E., 1987, Man the Hunted: Determinants of Household Spacing in Desert and Tropical Foraging Societies, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6:77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayden, B., 1979, Palaeolithic Reflections, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.Google Scholar
  6. Honigmann, J. J., 1961, Foodways in a Muskeg Community: An Anthropological Report on the Attawapiskat Indians, Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  7. Howitt, A. W., 1904, The Native Tribes of South-East Australia, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  8. Lee, R. B., 1979, The!Kung San, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Leroi-Gourhan, A., and Brézillon, M., 1966, L’habitation Magdalénienne No. 1 de Pincevent près Montereau (Seine-et-Marne), Gattia Préhistoire 9:263–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leroi-Gourhan, A., and Brézillon, M., 1972, Fouilles de Pincevent, Essai d’Analyse Ethnographique d’un Habitat Magdalénien (la section 36) (Gallia Préhistoire, 7th supplement). Monograph published by C.N.R.S., Paris.Google Scholar
  11. O’Connell, J. F., 1987, Alyawara Site Structure and Its Archaeological Implications, American Antiquity 52:74–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peterson, N., 1970, The Importance of Women in Determining the Composition of Residential Groups in Aboriginal Australia. In Woman’s Role in Aboriginal Society (F. Gale, ed.), Australian Aboriginal Studies No. 36/Social Anthropology Series No. 6, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra, pp. 9–15.Google Scholar
  13. Shapiro, W., 1979, Social Organization in Aboriginal Australia, St. Martin’s Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Silberbauer, G. B., 1981, Hunter and Habitat in the Central Kalahari Desert, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Speiss, A., 1982, Arctic Garbage and New England Paleoindians: The Single Occupation Option. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for American Archaeology, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  16. Whitelaw, T., 1983, People and Space in Hunter-Gatherer Camps: A Generalizing Approach in Ethnoarchaeology, Archaeological Review from Cambridge 2(2):48–66.Google Scholar
  17. Woodbum, J., 1972, Ecology, Nomadic Movement and the Composition of the Local Group among Hunters and Gatherers: An East African Example and Its Implications. In Man, Settlement and Urbanism, (P. J. Ucko, R. Tringham, and G. W. Dimbleby, eds.), Duckworth, London, pp. 193–206.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rob Gargett
    • 1
  • Brian Hayden
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of ArchaeologySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations