Advertisement

AC Susceptibility Techniques Applied to Thin Film Superconductors

  • J. H. Claassen

Abstract

The techniques of ac susceptibility have been used to evaluate several properties of thin films: critical temperature, critical current density, and penetration depth. Two basic approaches have been used. The first I would call “conventional”, in that the sample is mounted in a conventional ac susceptibility apparatus that is normally used to measure bulk samples. Here the drive and receive coils are both large compared to the lateral dimensions of the sample. A second approach is unique to thin films and involves drive and receive coils that are small compared to the lateral dimensions of the sample. These coils are generally designed to couple only to a region near the center of the sample, thus being insensitive to the exact size or details of the outer edge of the film.

Keywords

Mutual Inductance Mutual Coupling Total Magnetic Moment Total Moment Flux Creep 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. A. Osborne, Demagnetizing Factors of the General Ellipsoid, Phys. Rev. 67:351 (1945).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michael Tinkham, “Introduction to Superconductivity”, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1975), p. 91.Google Scholar
  3. D. Shoenberg, “Superconductivity”, Cambridge University Press, London, (1952), p. 23.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    This expression can be obtained by integrating M=B-H across the film thickness. An expression for B(x) is given, for example, in Tinkham’s book (ref. 2), Eq. 4-54a.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Ch. Neuman, P. Ziemann, J. Geerk, and H. C. Li, Characterization of YBaCuO Films by ac-Susceptibility Measurements, Journal of the Less-Common Metals 151:363 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    K Kanoda, H. Mazaki, N. Hosoito, and T. Shinjo, Magnetic-field penetration depth and material parameters of V-Ag multilayered superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 35:8413 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    This of course is only true for simply connected samples.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Charles P. Bean, Magnetization of High-Field Superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phvs. 36:31 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    John R. Reitz, Frederick J. Milford, and Robert W. Christy, “Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., (1979), p. 166.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    We have μ0Jc=(∂Br/dz-∂Bz/dr) from Maxwell’s equations, and the cylindrical geometry ensures that the first term is zero.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    M. Dáumling and D. C. Larbalestier, Critical state in disk-shaped superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 40:9350 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    The calculated weak divergence in B at the center of a disk really means that the critical state cannot be reached in some small region near the center.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    This can be obtained from Maxwell’s equation curl(E)=dB/dt, which in cylindrical coordinates becomes dE/dr+E/r=-dB/dt. Integrating over r yields the given expression.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    John Talvacchio, Critical Currents in A-15 Superconductors, Dissertation, Stanford University, 1982 (unpublished). The expression given in (6) is obtained by integrating the Biot-Savart law over the sample assuming a constant ∣J∣.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    R. G. Humphreys, private communication (Royal Signals and Radar Establishment, St. Andrews Road, Malvern, Worch. WR14 3PS, UK).Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    A. T. Fiory, A. F. Hebard, P. M. Mankiewich, and R. E. Howard, Penetration depths of high Tc films measured by two-coil mutual inductances, Appl. Phvs. Lett. 52:2165 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 16.
    B. Jeanneret, J. L. Gavilano, G. A. Racine, Ch. Leemann, and P. Martinoli, Inductive conductance measurements in two-dimensional superconducting systems, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55:2336 1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    P. G. de Gennes, „Superconductivity of Metals and Alloys“. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, Amsterdam, (1966), p. 194.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    Note that this is the the result if the external field is applied after the sample has gone superconducting; ie., there is no trapped flux.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    For this calculation we use the two-fluid expression for the penetration depth, λ2(T)=λ2(O)/[1-(T/Tc)4].Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    S. Fahey, C. Kittel, and S. G. Louie, Electromagnetic screening by metals, Am. J. Phys. 56:989 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    At very low values of p account must be taken of the reactance of the superfluid component. In the simplest two-fluid approximation, this would add a term Rd/2λ2 in the denominator of (10).Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    J. H. Claassen, M. E. Reeves, and R. J. Soulen, A contactless method for measurement of the critical current density and critical temperature of superconducting films, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62:996 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 23.
    A. T. Fiory, this conference.Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    A. F. Hebard, A. T. Fiory, and D. R. Harshman, Magnetic Penetration Depth of YBa2Cu3O7, Phvs. Rev. Lett. 62:2885 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 25.
    J. H. Claassen, J. E. Evetts, R. E. Somekh, and Z. H. Barber, to be published in Phys. Rev. B1.Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    J. D. Jackson, “Classical Electrodynamics”, Wiley, New York, (1975) p. 177.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 27.
    If the pinning is strong, the field profile evidently is unchanged when the sample goes superconducting. Even in the opposite limit the field profile will be nearly uniform: because of demagnetizing effects there will be complete field exclusion out to a radius r, defined by Hcl≈H(r/d). Thus the region of zero field is very small, of the order of the film thickness. The same sort of argument suggests that the region of partial shielding only extends a short distance (compared to the coil radius) from the center.Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    J. D. Hettinger, A. G. Swanson, W. J. Skocpol, J. S. Brooks, J. M. Graybeal, P. M. Mankiewich, R. E. Howard, B. L. Straughn, and E. G. Burkhardt, Flux Creep and High-Field Critical Currents in Epitaxial Thin Films of YBa2Cu3O7, Phvs. Rev. Lett. 62:2044 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 29.
    J. H. Claassen, Inductive Measurements of Critical Current Density in Superconducting Thin Films, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 25:2233 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 30.
    L. H. Allen and J. H. Claassen, Technique for measuring the elementary pinning force in thin films, Phvs. Rev. B 39:2054 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 31.
    Emil Polturak, Daniel Cohen, David Cohen, and Gad Koren, A Self Contained Inductance Bridge for Rapid NDT of Superconducting Thin Films, this proceedings.Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    Dimitrios G. Xenikos and Thomas R. Lemberger, ac susceptibility apparatus for measuring the transition temperature of high-Tc crystals, sintered samples, and films, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 60:831 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 33.
    T. L. Hylton, M. R. Beasley, and R. C. Taber, An iron-core magnetic inductance probe to measure critical current densities in superconducting thin films, preprint.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Claassen
    • 1
  1. 1.Naval Research Lab.USA

Personalised recommendations