Abstract
As a graduate student majoring in academic social psychology I was exposed to a wondrous assemblage of theories that seemed to offer practically limitless resources with which to help solve important, large-scale, real-world problems. Initially I found it mildly disturbing that many of these theories were validated using primarily experimental methodologies involving samples (sometimes very large samples) that usually consisted of college undergraduates. Indeed, I felt that the most appropriate context in which to validate these theories was the applied setting—where the important, large-scale, real-world problems actually occurred. The ready availability of large random samples of college undergraduates in close proximity to social psychology laboratories, however, constituted an irresistible opportunity to initiate laboratory-based research programs of my own, that actively continue today. I benefit from this approach, of course, vis-à -vis numerous substantive and methodological insights that ultimately improve my ability to do science.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Books/Cole.
Baer, D. M. (1977). Perhaps it would be better not to know everything. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 167–172.
Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd Ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
Blumenthal, J. A., O’Toole, L. C, & Haney, T. (1984). Behavioral assessment of the Type A behavior pattern. Psychosomatic Medicine, 46, 415–423.
Cattell, R. B. (1952). Psychological measurement: Normative, ipsative, interactive. Psychological Review, 51, 292–303.
Cook, E. P. (1985). Psychological androgyny. New York: Pergamon Press.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1978). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C. (1963). Theory of generalizability: A liberalization of reliability theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 15, 137–163.
Davidson, P. O., & Costello, C. G. (Eds.). (1969). N=l: Experimental studies of single cases. New York: Van Nostrand.
DeProspero, A., & Cohen, S. (1979). Inconsistent visual analysis of intrasubject data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 573–579.
Harris, C. W. (1953). Relations among factors of raw, deviation, and double-centered score matrices. Journal of Experimental Education, 22, 53–58.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Holland, B. S., & Copenhaver, M. D. (1987). An improved sequentially rejective Bonferroni test procedure. Biometrics, 43, 417–423.
Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). M eta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lamiell, J. T. (1981). Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist, 36, 276–289.
Magnusson, D. (1967). Test theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
McDowall, D., McCleary, R., Meidinger, E. E., & May, R. A. (1980). Interrupted time series analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Michael, J. (1974). Statistical inference for individual organism research: Mixed blessing or curse? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 647–653.
Mueser, K. T., Yarnold, P. R., & Foy, D. W. (1991). Statistical analysis for single-case designs: Evaluating outcome of imaginai exposure treatment of chronic PTSD. Behavior Modification, 15, 134–155.
Payne, R. W., & Jones, H. G. (1957). Statistics for the investigation of individual cases. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 13, 115–121.
Rogers, J. H., & Widiger, T. A. (1989). Comparing idiothetic, ipsative, and normative indices of consistency. Journal of Personality, 57, 847–869.
Saunders, P. T. (1980). An introduction to catastrophie theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strahan, R. F. (1975). Remarks on Bern’s measurement of psychological androgyny: Alternative methods and a supplementary analysis. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 43, 568–571.
Yarnold, P. R. (1982). On testing inter-scale difference scores within a profile. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 1037–1044.
Yarnold, P. R. (1984). The reliability of a profile. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 49–59.
Yarnold, P. R. (1988). Classical test theory methods for repeated-measures N=l research designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 913–919.
Yarnold, P. R., Bryant, F. B., & Lyons, J. S. (1988). 5AM: The Successful Applicant Map. Chicago: TGP.
Yarnold, P. R., Nightingale, S. N., Curry, R. H., & Martin, G. J. (1990). Psychological androgyny and preference for intubation in a hypothetical case of end-stage lung disease. Medical Decision Making, 10, 215–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yarnold, P.R. (1992). Statistical Analysis for Single-Case Designs. In: Bryant, F.B., et al. Methodological Issues in Applied Social Psychology. Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2308-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2308-0_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2310-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2308-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive