Skip to main content

Conditional Item Bias Methods

  • Chapter
Human Assessment and Cultural Factors

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((HF,volume 21))

Abstract

Item bias studies investigate whether different ethnic, racial or cultural groups show different response behaviour to test items. Reviews of item bias methods have been given by Jensen (1980, chap. 9), Petersen (1977), and Rudner, Getson and Knight (1980). A distinction will be made between unconditional and conditional methods. In this paper the emphasis is on conditional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Angoff, W. H., and Ford, S. F. Item-race interaction on a test of scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973, 10, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, F. B. A criticism of Scheuneman’s item bias technique. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1981, 18, 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. J., and Neider, J. A. General Linear Interactive Modelling (GLIM). Release 3, Numerical Algorithms. Oxford, England: 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Holland, P. W. Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1975.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cardall, C., and Coffman, W. E. A Method for Comparing the Perform-and of Different Groups on the Items in a Test. Research Bulletin 64-10. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., and Dekking, Y. M. Cognitieve Aspecten van Social Angst bij Kinderen. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. J., and Brown, M. D. Biomedical Computer Programs, P-Series 1977. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echternacht, G. A quick method for determining item bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974, 34, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E. The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A., and Fay, R. ECTA Program, Description for Users. Chicago: Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. Bias in Mental Testing. London: Methuen, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. A study of item bias, using item characteristic curve theory. In Y. H. Poortinga (Ed.), Basic Problems in Cross-Cultural Psychology. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger, 1977, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G. J. Applicability of the Rasch model in two cultures: In L. J. Cronbach and P. J. D. Drenth (Eds.), Mental Tests and Cultural Adaptation. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G. J. Contingency table models for assessing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1982, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, N. S. Bias in the Selection Rule—Bias in the Test. Paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Educational Testing, University of Leiden, The Netherlands, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plake, B. S., and Hoover, H. D. An analytical method of identifying biased test items. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1979, 48, 153–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudner, L. M., Getson, P. R., and Knight, D. L. Biased item detection techniques. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1980, 5, 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuneman, J. A method of assessing bias in test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1979, 16, 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stijlen, J. G. Item Bias. Preliminary part of an unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Flier, H. Vergelijkbaarheid van Individuele Testprestaties. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Flier, H., Mellenbergh, G. J., Ader, H. J., and Wijn, M. The Iterative Item Bias Detection Method, 1982. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H., Morgan, A., and Gustafsson, J. E. A review of estimation procedures for the Rasch model with an eye toward longish tests. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1980, 5, 35–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mellenbergh, G.J. (1983). Conditional Item Bias Methods. In: Irvine, S.H., Berry, J.W. (eds) Human Assessment and Cultural Factors. NATO Conference Series, vol 21. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2151-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2151-2_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2153-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2151-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics