Skip to main content

Strategies and Styles of Learning

An Integration of Varied Perspectives

  • Chapter
Learning Strategies and Learning Styles

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

The way we go about accomplishing learning will of course depend upon what we conceive of learning to be. I begin this concluding chapter by discussing definitions of learning. Then, I deal with the approaches students take to the task of learning in school. Approaches are the observable attempts of students to adapt to school, and they reflect both the school environment and the students themselves—individuals made up of unique past experiences and unique styles of perceiving and thinking. I consider some of the variables that contribute to the individuality of the student, including motives, self-concepts, and cognitive styles. I end by considering ways of improving learning, but since we can do little to change personality and cognitive style directly, suggestions generally involve modifications to the school environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. T. (1966). A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1984). Learning strategies, student motivation patterns, and subjectively perceived success. J. R. Kirby (Ed.), Cognitive strategies and educational performance. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birney, R. C., Burdick, H., & Teevan, R. C. (1969). Fear of failure. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Beahvior, 11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, J. P. (1980). Planning: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Psychological Research (W. Germany), 41, 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyk, R. B. (1969). An exploratory study of mother-child interaction in infancy as related to the development of differentiation. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 8, 657–691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eison, J. A. (1981). A new instrument of assessing students’ orientations toward grades and learning. Psychological Reports, 48, 919–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eison, J. A. (1982). Educational and personal dimensions of learning-and grade-oriented students. Psychological Reports, 51, 867–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eison, J. A., & Pollio, H. R. (1985, September). A multidimensional approach to the definition of college students’p learning styles. Journal of College Student Personnel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eison, J. A., Pollio, H. R., & Milton, O. (1986). Educational and personal characteristics of four different types of learning-and grade-oriented students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Wilson, J. D. (1977). Degrees of excellence: The academic achievement game. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransson, A. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning: IV. Effects of motivation and text anxiety on process and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 244–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hounsell, D. A. (1984). Students’ conceptions of essay writing. Unpublsihed Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, N. (1976). Cognitive styles in infancy and early childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1981). Language and cognition. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, S., McCarthy, P., & Schmeck, R. R. (1984). Validity of self-efficacy as a predictor of writing performance. Cognitive therapy and research, 8, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R., & Eccles, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapists view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., & Posner, M. I. (1985) Temperament and the development of self regulation. In L. C. Hartlage & L. F. Telzrow (Eds.), The neuropsychology of individual differences. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (1975). Qualitative differences in learning as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. Gothenberg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (1982). Learning and understanding: A study of differences in constructing meaning from a text. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R. (1981). Improving learning by improving thinking. Educational Leadership, 38, 384–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R. (1983). Learning styles of college students. In Dillon, R. F., & Schmeck, R. R. (Eds.). Individual differences in cognition, Volume 1. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R., & Meier, S. (1984). Self-reference as a learning strategy and a learning style. Human Learning, 3, 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R., & Ribich, F. D. (1978). Construct validation of the inventory of learning processes. Applied Psycological Measurement, 2, 551–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R., & Spofford, M. (in press). Attention to semantic verbal attributes as a function of individual differences in arousal and learning strategy. Contemporary Educational Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R., Ribich, F. D., & Ramanaiah, N. (1977). Development of a self-report inventory for assessing individual differences in learning processes. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. (1965). Neurotic styles. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rossum, E. J., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy, and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1965) The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 1-64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmeck, R.R. (1988). Strategies and Styles of Learning. In: Schmeck, R.R. (eds) Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2120-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2118-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics