Skip to main content
  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

There are numerous tests and assessment methods covering the areas of ability, aptitude, achievement, and interest. The commonly accepted definitions of these terms are as follows. Ability is a person’s current power to perform a task. Aptitude, on the other hand, is defined as one’s potential to perform a task given maximum training and opportunity. Both of these concepts are intertwined with achievement, which is interpreted as the level that individuals demonstrate their current or past performance. As a concept, interest stands somewhat apart from the other terms. Interest is defined very closely to the word like. For example, a person may like (have an interest) in a sport but have no aptitude or ability in his or her interest. The measurements used in ability and aptitude tests have concentrated on academic or cognitive tasks, whereas interest surveys have typically concentrated on the world or work. One can then contrast these cognitive tests with interest tests. The most highly developed measurement devices in the cognitive domain are the intelligence tests. Because the history of the testing movement, contemporary issues, and debates concerning the future of the testing movement are most dramatically illustrated in relation to the assessment of intelligence, a major portion of this chapter will be devoted to the discussion of the assessment of intelligence, its historical development, current status, and future direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, P. T., Peters, J. E., & Dykman, R. A. (1971). Children with specific learning disabilities; WISC profiles. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, A. (1972). Improving academic scores through sensory integration. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6, 338–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsch, R. (1967). Achieving perceptual motor efficiency (Vol. 1). Seattle: Special Child Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A. (1911). Nouvelles recherches sur la mésure du nieveau intéllectuel chez les enfants d’école. L’Année Psychologigue, 17, 145–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaha, J., & Vance, H. B. (1979). The hierarchical factor structure of the WISC-R for learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A. (1985). A critical review of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). School Psychology Review, 14, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & French, L. (1979). The zone of potential development: Implications for intelligence testing in the year 2000. Intelligence, 3, 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, L., & Reynolds, C. R. (1981). Factor structure and specific variance of the WPPSI subtests at six age levels. Psychology in the Schools, 18, 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement of partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, A. (1974). Alistair Cooke’s America. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, R. S. (1977). Patterns of emotional disturbance on the WISC-R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 486–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delacato, C. (1966). Neurological organization and reading. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fass, P. S. (1980). The IQ: A cultural and historical framework. American Journal of Education, 88, 431–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss, J. L., Cohen, J., & Everitt, B. S. (1969). Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 323–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frostig, M. (1967). Testing as a basis for educational therapy. Journal of Special Education, 2, 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddes, W. H. (1975). Neurological implications for learning. In W. M. Cruikshank & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Perceptual and learning disabilities in children: Vol. 1. Psychological practices (pp. 148–194). Syracuse, NY: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. J., Hammeke, T. A., & Purisch, A. D. (1980). The Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutkin, T. B. (1978). Some useful statistics for the interpretation of the WISC-R. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1561–1563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, R. L. (1979). The utility of WISC-R subtest scores in discriminating among adequate and underachieving children. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, R. L., & Landino, S. A. (1981). The utility of WISC-R subtest analysis in discriminating among groups of conduct problem, withdrawn, mixed and nonproblem boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 91–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, R. L., & Raymond, M. R. (1981). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised (WISC-R) patterns of strengths and weaknesses as predictors of the intelligence-achievement relationship. Diagnostiqué, 6, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, R. L., & Saxe, J. E. (1983). Profile analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K. (1982). Advances in criterion-referenced testing technology. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 351–379). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindley, C. B., & Owen, C. F. (1978). The extent of individual changes in IQ for ages between 6 months and 17 years in a British longitudinal sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 19, 329–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1979). Trends in the measurement of intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynd, G. W., & Obrzut, J. E. (1981). School neuropsychology. Journal of School Psychology, 19, 45–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, J. F., & Jastak, S. R. (1976). Manual, the Wide Range Achievement Test (rev. ed.). Wilmington: Guidance Associates of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. (1975). Factor structure of the WISC-R at 11 age levels between 6½ and 16½ years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A., & Kaufman, N. (1983). Kaufman assessment battery for children, interpretative manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, S., & Kirk, W. (1971). Psycholinguistic learning disabilities: Diagnosis and remediation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kownslar, A. O., & Frizzle, D. B. (1967). Discovering American history. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N. M. (1981). Psychological evidence in Larry P. versus Wilson Riles. American Psychologist, 36, 937–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohnes, P. R. (1978). Review of the Career Assessment Inventory. In O. K. Buros (Ed.), The eighth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1549–1550). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, B. (1980). Hypothesized genetic racial differences in IQ; A criticism of three lines of evidence. Behavior Genetics, 10, 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, R. (1976-1977). Providing for individual differences: A history of the intelligence testing movement in North America. Interchange, 1, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. M. (1980). On the attempt to find WISC-R profiles for learning and reading disabilities (A response to Vance, Wallbrown, and Blaha). Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 338–340.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. J., & Clarizio, S. (1977). Improvement in IQ of high risk, disadvantaged preschool children enrolled in a developmental program. Psychological Reports, 41, 1111–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. R., & Hart, D. H. (1979). Factor structure of the WISC-R for a clinic referred population and specific subgroups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 643–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, R. E. (1967). The stream of American education. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, S. L. (1920). Scale of attainment No. 1: An examination of achievement in the second grade. Journal of Educational Research, 1, 572–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanaiah, N. V., & Adams, M. L. (1979). Confirmatory analysis of the WAIS and the WPPSI. Psychological Reports, 45, 351–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanaiah, N. V., O’Donnell, J., & Ribich, F. (1976). Multiple group factor analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 329–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. J. (1978). WISC-R factor structures among Anglos, blacks, Chicanos, and Native-American Papagos. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 417–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1979). The future of IQ testing in education. Intelligence, 3, 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (1982). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), A handbook for school psychology (pp. 178–208). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, B. P. (1975). Brain-behavior relationships in children with learning disabilities: A research program. American Psychologist, 30, 911–920.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rugel, R. P. (1974). WISC subtest scores of disabled readers: A review with respect to Bannatyne’s recategorization. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (1974). Assessment of children’s intelligence (rev. reprint). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (1982). Assessment of children’s intelligence and special abilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, D. L., Beebe, M. C, & Koepke, T. (1978). Factor analysis of WISC-R scores for children identified as learning disabled, educable mentally impaired, and emotionally impaired. Psychology in the Schools, 15, 478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, A. B. (1969). An alternative factor analytic solution for Wechslers intelligence scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 763–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, H. A., & Lei, H. (1980). Modal profile analysis: A computer program for classification research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 769–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. D., Coleman, J. M., Dokecki, P. R., & Davis, E. E. (1977). Recategorized WISC-R scores of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 437–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (1981). Ethnic America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, W. (1914). The psychological methods of testing intelligence. Baltimore: Warwick & York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G. (1979). Test scatter on the WISC-R. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 626–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. J., Jr. (1980). The diagnostic utility of the WISC-R measures with children referred to a developmental evaluation center. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 440–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. K., & Zytowski, D. G. (Eds.). (1978). Sex-fair interest measurement: Research and implications. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, H. B., Wallbrown, F. H., & Blaha, J. (1978). Determining WISC-R profiles for reading disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 656–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, H. B., Singer, M. C, & Engin, A. W. (1980). WISC-R subtest differences for males and female LD children and youth. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 953–957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallbrown, F. H., Blaha, J., & Wherry, R. J. (1974). The hierarchical factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 44, 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1950). Cognitive, conative, and non-intellective intelligence. American Psychologist, 30, 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M. (Ed.). (1921). Psychological examining in the United States Army. In R. M. Yerkes (Ed.), Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences (Vol. 15). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hale, R.L. (1987). Evaluation of Intelligence, Achievement, Aptitude, and Interest. In: Van Hasselt, V.B., Hersen, M. (eds) Psychological Evaluation of the Developmentally and Physically Disabled. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1995-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1995-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1997-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1995-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics