The Taxonomy of Verbal Behavior

  • A. Charles Catania
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)

Abstract

The vocabulary of behavior analysis was established in the context of research with nonverbal organisms (Skinner, 1938). That vocabulary is based on a taxonomy of function rather than one of structure. For example, it identifies operant classes by their environmental effects rather than by their topographies. No major additions were made to this vocabulary when it was applied to the general properties of human behavior (Skinner, 1953), but the extension to specific features of verbal behavior was accompanied by a substantial expansion of technical terms (Skinner, 1957). Some of those terms categorize verbal responses in terms of the basic processes that contribute to their emission; for example, the term tact captures the role of discriminative stimuli in the control of a verbal response. Others take topographical features into account; for example, echoic and textual behavior are distinguished by whether relevant stimuli are auditory or visual. The taxonomy of verbal behavior did not originate in the laboratory. Instead, it was based on observations of verbal behavior in natural environments:

The emphasis is upon an orderly arrangement of well-known facts, in accordance with a formulation of behavior derived from an experimental analysis of a more rigorous sort. The present extension to verbal behavior is thus an exercise in interpretation rather than a quantitative extrapolation of rigorous experimental results. (Skinner, 1957, p. 11)

Nonetheless, the taxonomy of verbal behavior identifies units into which complex verbal behavior can be decomposed in an experimental analysis, and the continuing expansion of experimental analysis of verbal behavior is likely to add to that taxonomy.

Keywords

Recombination Ditioned Acoustics Stim Metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andronis, P. T. (1983). Symbolic aggression by pigeons: Contingency coadduction. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Baer, D. M., Peterson, R. F., and Sherman, J. A. (1967). The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 405–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer, R. A. Detrich, R., and Weninger, J. M. (1988). On the functional role of the verbalization in correspondence training procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Catania, A. C. (1989). Speaking of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 193–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catania, A. C. (1991a). Glossary. In I. H. Iversen and K. A. Lattai (Eds.), Experimental analysis of behavior. Part 2 (pp. G1 - G44 ). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland.Google Scholar
  6. Catania, A. C. (1991b). The phylogeny and ontogeny of language function. In N. A. Krasnegor, D. M. Rumbaugh, R. L. Schiefelbusch, and M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development (pp. 263–285 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Catania, A. C. (1992). Learning ( 3rd ed. ). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Catania, A. C., and Cerutti, D. (1986). Some nonverbal properties of verbal behavior. In T. Thompson and M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 185–211 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Catania, A. C., Matthews, B. A., and Shimoff, E. H. (1990). Properties of rule-governed behaviour and their implications. In D. E. Blackman and H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice (pp. 215–230 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.Google Scholar
  11. Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 597–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dinsmoor, J. A. (1983). Observing and conditioned reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 693–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Epstein, R. (1981). On pigeons and people: A preliminary look at the Columban Simulation Project. Behavior Analyst, 4, 43–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Esper, E. A. (1973). Analogy and association in linguistics and psychology. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ferster, C. B. (1967). Arbitrary and natural reinforcement. Psychological Record, 17, 341–347.Google Scholar
  16. Gewirtz, J. L., and Stingle, K. G. (1968). Learning of generalized imitation as the basis for identification. Psychological Review, 75, 374–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenspoon, J. (1955). The reinforcing effect of two spoken sounds on the frequency of two responses. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 409–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart, B., and Risley, T. R. (1955). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  19. Hayes, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In: S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, and K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9–30 ). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  20. Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., and Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horne, P. J., and Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, K. R., and Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475–1490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keller, F. S., and Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  24. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior: The Hixon Symposium (pp. 112–146 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., and Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lovaas, O. I. (1964). Cue properties of words: The control of operant responding by rate and content of verbal operants. Child Development, 35, 245–256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Moerk, E. L. (1992). A first language taught and learned. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  29. Poulson, C. L., Kymissis, E., Reeve, K. F., Andreatos, M., and Reeve, L. (1991). Generalized vocal imitation in infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 267–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pryor, K. W., Haag, R., and O’Reilly, J. (1969). The creative porpoise: Training for novel behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 653–661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Risley, T. R. (1977). The development and maintenance of language: An operant model. In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc, and D. M. Baer (Eds.), New developments in behavioral research (pp. 81–101 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Risley, T. R., and Hart, B. (1968). Developing correspondence between the nonverbal and verbal behavior of preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 267–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schlinger, H., and Blakely, E. (1987). Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. Behavior Analyst, 10, 41–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
  36. Sidman, M., Wynne, C. K., Maguire, R. W., and Barnes, T. (1989). Functional classes and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 261–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior or organisms. New York: Appleton Century.Google Scholar
  38. Skinner, B. E. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  40. Skinner, B. E. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Skinner, B. E. (1963). Behaviorism at fifty. Science, 140, 951–958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skinner, B. E. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
  43. Skinner, B. F. (1969). An operant analysis of problem solving. In B. E. Skinner, Contingencies of reinforcement (pp. 133–157 ). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  44. Skinner, B. E. (1989). The origins of cognitive thought. American Psychologist, 44, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vaughan, W., Jr. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wales, R. (1986). Deixis. In R. Fletcher and M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition ( 2nd ed., pp. 401–428 ). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child’s theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Werker, J. F. (1989). Becoming a native listener. American Scientist, 77, 54–59.Google Scholar
  49. Zettle, R. D., and Hayes, S. C. (1982). Rule-governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive-behavioral therapy. In R. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 73–118 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Charles Catania
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Maryland Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations