Adapting Cost Analytic Techniques to Local HIV Prevention Programs
Community planning groups and program managers have the difficult task of managing limited resources when they fund HIV prevention. They attempt to identify and reach target audiences within a geographic area with a variety of prevention programs, including counseling, testing, and community education. Their task involves allocating scarce resources among the interventions and the target populations. Those resources are not adequate to fund all interventions to all the target populations that could benefit, so the problem is one of selecting the most effective methods of preventing HIV infections at the least cost.
KeywordsExpense Kelly Verse Weinstein
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Centers for Disease Control. Overview of HIV/AIDS Prevention Interventions: An Approach to Examining Their Effectiveness, May 1995, The Academy for Educational Development funded by CDC.Google Scholar
- 2.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Announcement No. 704, Washington, DC; 1997.Google Scholar
- 3.Academy for Educational Development. Handbook for HIV Prevention Community Planning, Washington, DC; 1994.Google Scholar
- 4.Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford University Press; 1996; Chap. 6.Google Scholar
- 7.Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health and Human Services. Cooperative Agreements for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Prevention Projects Program Announcement, Order 300. Washington, DC, 1993; pp. 28-29.Google Scholar
- 8.Conference of Mayors, Technical Assistance Reports, Washington, DC, November 1990.Google Scholar
- 10.Mandelblatt JS, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of health interventions. In Gold MR, et al. Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York Oxford University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
- 11.Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW Methods for Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programs. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987; Chaps 4 and 5.Google Scholar
- 12.Haddix AC, Teutsch SM, Shafer PA, et al. Prevention Effectiveness. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996; Chaps 2, 5, and 8.Google Scholar
- 13.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Survey. Determining the Unit Cost of Services—A Guide for Estimating the Cost of Service. Funded by the White Care Act of 1990. Health Resources and Services Administrator, Washington, DC; 1992.Google Scholar
- 15.Kahn JG, Washington AE, Showstack JA, et al. Updated Estimates of the Impact and the Costs of HIV Prevention in Injection Users, Final Report. San Francisco: Institute of Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California. Prepared for the Division of STD/HIV Prevention, Center for Prevention Services, Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health and Human Services; September, 1992.Google Scholar
- 17.Pinkerton SD, Abramson PR. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing HIV transmission. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44(9): 1301–1312; Implications of increased infectivity in early-stage HIV infection—application of Bernoulli-process model of HIV transmission, Pinkerton SD, Abramson PR, Evaluation Rev 1996; 20(5): 516-540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar