Communication pp 179-224 | Cite as

Determinants of Conflict Outcomes

  • William J. HamiltonIII
  • John W. McNutt
Part of the Perspectives in Ethology book series (PEIE, volume 12)


Analysis of individual differences in competitive abilities is an essential part of the interpretation of unequal access to resources. Here we develop and apply a model applicable when dyadic contest outcomes determine access to resources, including mates. Individual differences in fighting ability may be decisive in determining contest outcomes. The components of fighting ability (FA) include inheritance (FAi), condition (FAc), experience (FAe) and development (FAd) to and throughout senescence (FAs). Present fighting ability (FAp) is a dynamic entity that varies as the value of these components change, waxing and waning as costs are incurred in contests. Fighting ability contributes to the probability that opponents will enter into and persist with patterns of conflict behavior and prevail as contest winners.

Simulations identify the probabilities of gaining access to status and resources when FA determines contest winners following dyadic contests. A sequence of interactions between opponents produce frequency distributions of fighting ability within populations which contain and may provide information to contestants about their fighting ability compared with that of other population members. Individual win:loss records may be incorporated into individual experience, resulting in effective behavioral responses to the probabilities of winning subsequent encounters. The probabilities of improving rank by transferring from one to another linear dominance hierarchy are determined given the assumption that FA determines rank. We identify the relationship of fighting ability to contests for resources in a competitive arena where some individuals are excluded from resources. These simulations emphasize the value of diachronic observations of individual contest histories and outcomes.

When fighting ability is not decisive in determining contest outcomes and the distribution of resources, the relative effect of other parameters in doing so is enhanced. The analysis of competitive behavior promotes identification of separable parameters which sometimes have opposing effects. Determinants of these additional processes occurring during animal conflict are identified and their utility in separating behavioral relationships is considered. These determinants include social support (S) from additional parties in contests and resource value (V), a collection of several relevant parameters influencing motivation. Motivation (M), the propensity of individuals to enter into and persist with contests, is a diversely used term. But the processes and phenomena it incorporates cannot be discarded, because without its role in the analysis of individual differences, fitness consequences of behavior are necessarily analyzed exclusively as a function of V.

Studies of the relationship of the determinants of conflict outcome identified here have been and can be incorporated into general models of contest behavior. To determine their respective effect upon conflict behavior and contest outcomes, some components of fighting ability can be set equal by experimentation or ordering of field observations. We extend our model to groups of individuals arranged in linear dominance hierarchies and to the ideal despotic distribution where access to resources is contested by many individuals. We make predictions about the exact probabilities of winning under alternative circumstances. We suggest how animals might adjust their behavior if they were to use the estimates of personal fighting ability identified by simulations to estimate their probability of winning.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, J. C., Dunbrack, R. L., and Orr, C. D. (1985). The interaction of size and experience in dominance relationships of juvenile steelhead trout (Salmo gairdneri). Behaviour, 92, 241–253.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, E., and Caldwell, R. L. (1990). Deceptive communication in asymmetric fights of the stomatopod crustacean Gonodactylus bredini. Anim. Behav., 39, 706–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcock, J., Jones, C. E., and Buchmann, S. L. (1977). Male mating strategies in the bee Centris pallida Fox (Anthophoridae: Hymenoptera). Am. Nat., 111, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aldis, O. (1975). Play fighting. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Alexander, R. D. (1961). Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behavior in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behaviour, 17, 130–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alexander, R. D. (1987). Biology of moral systems. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  7. Andersson, M. (1982). Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 17, 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andren, H. (1990). Despotic distribution, unequal reproductive success, and population regulation in the jay Garrulus glandarius L. Ecology, 71, 1796–1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arcese, P. (1987). Age, intrusion pressure and defence against floaters by territorial male song sparrows. Anim. Behav., 35, 773–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arcese, P. (1989). Territory acquisition and loss in male song sparrows. Anim. Behav., 37 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Austad, S. N., Jones, W. T., and Waser, P. M. (1979). Territorial defence in speckled wood butterflies: why does the resident always win? Anim. Behav., 27, 960–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baptista, L. F., DeWolfe, B. B., and Avery-Beausoleil, L. (1987). Testosterone, aggression and dominance in Gambel’s white-crowned sparrows. Wilson Bull., 99, 86–91.Google Scholar
  13. Barash, D. P. (1982). Sociobiology and behavior, (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Barlow, G. W., Rogers, W., and Fraley, N. (1986). Do Midas cichlids win through prowess or daring? It depends. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 19, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barnard, C. J., and Brown, C. A. J. (1984). A payoff asymmetry in resident-resident disputes between shrews. Anim. Behav., 32, 302–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Barnard, C. J., and Burk, T. (1979). Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of “individual recognition.” J. Theor. Biol., 81, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Barrette, C. (1977). Fighting behaviour of muntjac and the evolution of antlers. Evolution, 31, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Barrette, C., and Vandal, D. (1990). Sparring, relative antler size, and assessment in male caribou. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 26, 383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bekoff, M. (1974). Social play in coyotes, wolves, and dogs. Bio. Sci., 24, 225–230.Google Scholar
  20. Beletsky, L. D., and Orians, G. H. (1987a). Territoriality among male red-winged blackbirds. I. Site fidelity and movement patterns. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 20, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Beletsky, L. D., and Orians, G. H. (1987b). Territoriality among male red-winged blackbirds. II. Removal experiments and site dominance. Behav. Ecol Sociobiol., 20, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bercovitch, F. B. (1989). Body size, sperm competition, and determinants of reproductive success in male savanna baboons. Evolution, 43, 1507–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bercovitch, F. B., and Goy, R. W. (1990). The socioendocrinology of reproductive development and reproductive success in macaques. In Ziegler, T. E., and Bercovitch, F. B. (eds.), Socioendocrinology of primate reproduction (pp. 59–93). New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
  24. Berger, J. (1981). The role of risks in mammalian combat: zebra and onager fights. Z. Tierpsychol, 56, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bernstein, I. S., and Gordon, T. P. (1980). The social component of dominance relationships in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatto). Anim. Behav., 28, 1033–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Boyd, H. (1953). On encounters between wild white-fronted geese in winter flocks. Behaviour, 5, 85–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Boyd, R., and Silk, J. B. (1983). A method for assigning cardinal dominance ranks. Anim. Behav., 31, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Brockmann, H. J., Grafen, A., and Dawkins, R. (1979). Evolutionarily stable nesting strategy in a digger wasp. J. Theor. Biol., 77, 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Bronstein, P. M. (1985). Agonistic and reproductive interactions in Betta splendens. J. Comp. Psychol., 98, 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bulger, J. B. (1993). Dominance rank and access to estrous females in male savanna baboons. Behaviour, 127, 67–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Burk, T. (1983). Male aggression and female choice in a field cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus): The importance of courtship song. In Gwynne, D. T., and Morris, G. K. (eds.), Orthopteran mating systems (pp. 97–119). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  32. Bygott, J. D. (1979). Agonistic behavior, dominance and social structure in wild chimpanzees of the Gombe National Park. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.), The great apes (pp. 405–427). Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
  33. Cade, W. H. (1984). Genetic variation underlying sexual behavior and reproduction. Am. Zool., 24, 355–366.Google Scholar
  34. Caldwell, R. L. (1986). The deceptive use of reputation by stomatopods. In Mitchell, R. W., and Thompson, N. S. (eds.), Deception: Perspectives on human and nonhuman deceit (pp. 129–145). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  35. Chase, I. D. (1982). Dynamics of hierarchy formation: the sequential development of dominance relationships. Behaviour, 80, 218–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Chase, I. D. (1984). Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: a comparative perspective. In Barchas, P. R. (ed.), Social hierarchies (pp. 45–80). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  37. Chase, I. D. (1985). The sequential analysis of aggressive acts during hierarchy formation: an application of the ‘jigsaw puzzle’ approach. Anim. Behav., 33, 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cheney, D. L. (1987). Interactions and relationships between groups. In Smuts, B. B., et al. (eds.), Primate societies (pp. 267–281). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Cheney, D. L., and Seyfarth, R. M. (1983). Nonrandom dispersal in free-ranging vervet monkeys: social and genetic consequences. Am. Nat., 122, 392–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Christian, J. J., and Davis, D. E. (1964). Endocrines, behavior, and population. Science, 146, 1550–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Clifford, D. H., Green, K. A., and Watterson, R. M. (1990). The pit bull dilemma. Philadelphia, PA: Charles.Google Scholar
  42. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D., Gibson, R. M., and Guinness, F. E. (1979). The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Anim. Behav., 27, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. (1976). Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In Bateson, P. P. G., and Hinde, R. A. (eds.), Growing points in ethology (pp. 195–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Cockburn, A., and Lee, A. K. (1988). Marsupial femmes fatales. Nat. Hist., 97, 40–47.Google Scholar
  45. Collias, N. E. (1943). Statistical analysis of factors which make for success in initial encounters between hens. Am. Nat., 77, 519–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Crespi, B. J. (1986). Size assessment and alternative fighting tactics in Elaphrothrips tuberculatus (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Anim. Behav., 34, 1324–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Davies, N. B. (1978). Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): the resident always wins. Anim. Behav., 26, 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Dixon, K. A., and Cade, W. H. (1986). Some factors influencing male-male aggression in the field cricket Gryllus integer (time of day, age, weight and sexual maturity). Anim. Behav., 34, 340–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Dugatkin, L. A., and Biederman, L. (1991). Balancing asymmetries in resource holding power and resource value in the pumpkinseed suhfish. Anim. Behav., 42, 691–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. DuMond, F. V., and Hutchinson, T. C. (1967). Squirrel monkey reproduction: the “fatted” male phenomenon and seasonal spermatogenesis. Science, 158, 1067–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1988). Primate social systems. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Dunbar, R. I. M., Buckland, D., and Miller, D. (1990). Mating strategies of male feral goats: a problem in optimal foraging. Anim. Behav., 40, 653–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Eckert, C. G., and Weatherhead, P. J. (1987). Owners, floaters and competitive asymmetries among territorial red-winged blackbirds. Anim. Behav., 35, 1317–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Enquist, M., and Leimar, O. (1983). Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. J. Theor. Biol., 102, 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Enquist, M., and Leimar, O. (1987). Evolution of fighting behaviour: the effect of variation in resource value. J. Theor. Biol., 127, 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Enquist, M., and Leimar, O. (1990). The evolution of fatal fighting. Anim. Behav., 39, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Estes, R. D. (1969). Territorial behavior of the wildebeest Connochaetes taurinus Burchell, 1823). Z. Tierpsychol., 26, 284–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ewald, P. W. (1985). Influence of asymmetries in resource quality and age on aggression and dominance in black-chinned hummingbirds. Anim. Behav., 33, 705–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Festa-Bianchet, M., Apollonio, M., Mari, F., and Rasola, G. (1990). Aggression among lekking male fallow deer (Dama dama): territory effects and relationship with copulatory success. Ethology, 85, 236–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Finch, C. E. (1990). Longevity, senescence, and the genome. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Finsterbusch, C. A. (1980). Cock fighting. Surrey: Hindehead, Saiga Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  64. Forsyth, A., and Montgomerie, R. D. (1987). Alternative reproductive tactics in the territorial damselfly Calopteryx maculata: sneaking by older males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 21, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Francis, R. C. (1988). Socially mediated variation in growth rate of the Midas cichlid: the primacy of early size differences. Anim. Behav., 36, 1844–1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Franck, D., and Ribowski, A. (1987). Influences of prior agonistic experiences on aggression measures in the male swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri). Behaviour, 103, 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Franck, D., and Ribowski, A. (1989). Escalating fights for rank-order position between male swordtails Xiphophorus helleri): effects of prior rank-order experience and information transfer. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 24, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Freeman, S. (1987). Male red-winged blackbirds Agelaius phoeniceus) assess RHP of neighbors by watching contests. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 21, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Fretwell, S. D., and Lucas, H. L. (1969). On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor., 19, 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Geist, V. (1971). Mountain sheep: A study in behavior and evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Geist, V. (1974). On fighting strategies in animal combat. Nature, 250, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Geist, V. (1986). New evidence of high frequency of antler wounding in cervids. Can. J. Zool., 64, 380–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Getty, T. (1981). Competitive collusion: the presumption of competition during the sequential establishment of territories. Am. Nat., 118, 426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Getty, T. (1987). Dear enemies and the prisoner’s dilemma: why territorial neighbors form defensive coalitions. Am. Zool., 27, 327–336.Google Scholar
  75. Gibson, R. M., and Bradbury, J. W. (1985). Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 18, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ginsburg, B., and Allee, W. C. (1942). Some effects of conditioning on social dominance and subordination in inbred strains of mice. Physiol. Zool., 15, 485–506.Google Scholar
  77. Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 205, 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Gouzoules, H. (1975). Maternal rank and early social interactions of infant stumptail macaques, Macaca arctoides. Primates, 16, 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Grafen, A. (1987). The logic of divisively asymmetric contests: respect for ownership and the desperado effect. Anim. Behav., 35, 462–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Grinnell, J., Packer, C, and Pusey, A. E. (1995). Cooperation in male lions: kinship, reciprocity or mutualism. Anim. Behav., 49, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Groos, K. (1898). The play of animals. New York: Appleton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Guhl, A. M., and Allee, W. C. (1944). Some measurable effects of social organization in flocks of hens. Physiol. Zool., 17, 320–347.Google Scholar
  83. Hall-Martin, A. J. (1987). Role of musth in the reproductive strategy of the African elephant. S. Afr. J. Sci., 83, 616–620.Google Scholar
  84. Hamilton, W. J., III, and Bulger, J. B. (1990). Natal male baboon rank rises and successful challenges to resident alpha males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 26, 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Hamilton, W. J., III, Buskirk, R. E., and Buskirk, W. H. (1976). Social organization of the Namib Desert tenebrionid beetle Onymacris rugatipennis. Can. Ent., 108, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Hammerstein, P. (1981). The role of asymmetries in animal contests. Anim. Behav., 29, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Hammerstein, P., and Riechert, S. E. (1988). Payoffs and strategies in territorial contests: ESS analyses of two ecotypes of the spider Agelenopsis aperta. Evol. Ecol., 2, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Hand, J. L. (1986). Resolution of social conflicts: dominance, egalitarianism, spheres of dominance, and game theory. Quart. Rev. Biol., 61, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Hannes, R. P., Franck, D., and Liemann, F. (1984). Effects of rank-order fights on whole-body and blood concentrations of androgens and corticosteroids in the male swordtail (Xiphophorus hellen). Z. Tierpsychol., 65, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Hanson, H. C. (1953). Inter-family dominance in Canada geese. Auk, 70, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Harding, C. F. (1981). Social modulation of circulating hormone levels in the male. Am. Zool., 21, 223–231.Google Scholar
  92. Harding, C. F., and Follett, B. K. (1979). Hormone changes triggered by aggression in a natural population of blackbirds. Science, 203, 919–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Hausfater, G., Altmann, J., and Altmann, S. (1982). Long-term consistency of dominance relations among female baboons (Papio cynocephalus). Science, 217, 752–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Heinrich, B., and Marzluff, J. M. (1991). Do common ravens yell because they want to attract others? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 28, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Hirth, D. H. (1977). Social behavior of white-tailed deer in relation to habitat. Wildl. Monog., 53, 1–55.Google Scholar
  96. Hofer, H., and East, M. L. (1993). The commuting system of Serengeti spotted hyaenas: how a predator copes with migratory prey. II. Intrusion pressure and commuters’ space use. Anim. Behav., 46, 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Hoff, C. P. (1981). Dogfighting in America: A national overview. New York: ASPIC.Google Scholar
  98. Huntingford, F., and Turner, A. (1987). Animal conflict. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Jackson, W. M. (1988). Can individual differences in history of dominance explain the development of linear dominance hierarchies? Ethology, 79, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Jackson, W. M. (1991). Why do winners keep winning? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 28, 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Jaeger, R. G. (1981). Dear enemy recognition and the costs of aggression between salamanders. Am. Nat., 118, 972–974.Google Scholar
  102. Jakobsson, S., Radesateer, T., and Jarvi, T. (1979). On the fighting behaviour of Nannacara anomala (Pisces, Cichlidae). Z. Tierpsychol., 49, 210–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Jarvis, J. U. M. (1978). Energetics of survival in Heterocephalus glaber (Ruppell), the naked mole-rat (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist., 6, 81–87.Google Scholar
  104. Jarvis, J. U. M. (1981). Eusociality in a mammal: cooperative breeding in naked mole-rat colonies. Science, 212, 571–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Jenkins, D., Watson, A., and Miller, G. R. (1967). Population fluctuations in the red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus). J. Anim. Ecol., 36, 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Jones, J. S. (1987). The heritability of fitness: bad news for ‘good genes’? TREE, 2, 35–38.Google Scholar
  107. Kahn, M. W. (1951). The effect of severe defeat at various age levels on the aggressive behavior of mice. J. Genet. Psychol., 79, 117–130.Google Scholar
  108. Kawai, M. (1965). On the system of social ranks in a natural troop of Japanese monkeys, 1: Basic rank and dependent rank. In Imanishi, K., and Altmann, S. A. (eds.), Japanese monkeys. Atlanta, GA: Emory University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Keeley, E. R., and Grant, J. W. A. (1993). Visual information, resource value, and sequential assessment in convict cichlid (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum) contests. Behav. Ecol., 4, 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. King, M. G. (1965). The effect of social context on dominance capacity of domestic hens. Anim. Behav., 13, 132–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Krebs, J. R. (1982). Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): do residents always win? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 11, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Krebs, J. R., and Dawkins, R. (1984). Animal signals: mind-reading and manipulation. In Krebs, R., and Davies, N. B. (eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach, (2nd ed., pp. 380–402). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  113. Kruuk, H. (1972). The spotted hyena: A study of predation and social behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  114. Landau, H. G. (1951). On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristics. Bull. Math. Biophys., 13, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Landau, H. G. (1965). Development of structure in a society with a dominance relation when new members are added successively. Bull. Math. Biophys., 27, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Le Boeuf, B. J. (1974). Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. Am. Zool., 14, 163–176.Google Scholar
  117. Le Boeuf, B. J., and Reiter, J. (1988). Lifetime reproductive success in northern elephant seals. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.), Reproductive success (pp. 344–362). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  118. Leimar, O., and Enquist, M. (1984). Effects of asymmetries in owner-intruder interactions. J. Theor. Biol., 111, 475–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Lott, D. F. (1979). Dominance relations and breeding rates in mature male American bison. Z. Tierpsychol., 49, 319–337.Google Scholar
  120. Magnuson, J. J. (1962). An analysis of aggressive behavior, growth, and competition for food and space in medaka (Oryzias latipes, Pisces, Cyprinodontidae). Can. J. Zool., 40, 313–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Marden, J. H. (1987). In pursuit of females: following and contest behavior by males of a Namib Desert tenebrionid beetle, Physadesmia globosa. Ethology, 75, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Marden, J. H., and Waage, J. K. (1990). Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim. Behav., 39, 954–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Maynard Smith, J. (1974). The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. J. Theor. Biol., 47, 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Maynard Smith, J. (1982a). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Maynard Smith, J. (1982b). Do animals convey information about their intentions? J. Theor. Biol., 97, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Maynard Smith, J., and Parker, G. A. (1976). The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim. Behav., 24, 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Maynard Smith, J., and Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. McBride, G. (1958). The measurement of aggressiveness in the domestic hen. Anim. Behav., 6, 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. McComb, K., Packer, C., and Pusey, A. (1994). Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo. Anim. Behav. 47, 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. McNutt, J. W. (1996). Sex-biased dispersal in African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). Anim. Behav., S2,1067–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. McVey, M. E. (1988). The opportunity for sexual selection in a territorial dragonfly, Erythemis simplicicollis. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.), Reproductive success (pp. 44–58). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  132. Montgomerie, R. D., and Weatherhead, P. J. (1988). Risks and rewards of nest defense by parent birds. Quart. Rev. Biol., 63, 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Mosler, H. (1985). Making the decision to continue the fight or to flee: an analysis of contests between male Haplochromis burtoni (Pisces). Behaviour, 92, 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Newman, M. A. (1956). Social behaviour and intra-specific competition on two trout species. Physiol. Zool., 29, 223–243.Google Scholar
  135. Noë, R. (1990). Alliance formation among male baboons: shopping for profitable partners. In Harcourt, A. H., and de Waal, F. B. M. (eds.), Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals (pp. 285–321). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  136. Noë, R. (1994). A model of coalition formation among male baboons with fighting ability as the crucial parameter. Anim. Behav., 47, 211–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Olsson, M. (1994). Nuptial coloration in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis: an intra-sexually selected cue to fighting ability. Anim. Behav., 48, 607–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Otronen, M. (1988). Intra-and intersexual interactions at breeding burrows in the horned beetle, Coprophanaeus ensifer. Anim. Behav., 36, 741–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Packer, C. (1977). Reciprocal altruism in olive baboons. Nature, 265, 441–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Packer, C. (1979). Male dominance and reproductive activity in Papio anubis. Anim. Behav., 27, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Packer, C., and Pusey, A. (1985). Asymmetric contests in social mammals: respect, manipulation and age-specific aspects. In Greenwood, P. J., Harvey, P. H., and Slatkin, M. (eds.), Evolution: Essays in honour of John Maynard Smith (pp. 173–186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  142. Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J. Theor. Biol., 47, 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Parker, G. A. (1982). Phenotype-limited evolutionarily stable strategies. In King’s College Sociobiology Group (eds.), Current problems in sociobiology (pp. 173–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  144. Parker, G. A., Mock, D. W., and Lamey, T. C. (1989). How selfish should stronger sibs be? Am. Nat., 133, 846–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Parker, G. A., and Rubenstein, D. I. (1981). Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts. Anim. Behav., 29, 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Pereira, M. E. (1989). Agonistic interactions of juvenile savanna baboons. II. Agonistic support and rank acquisition. Ethology, 80, 152–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Petrie, M. (1983). Female moorhens compete for small fat males. Science, 220, 413–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Petrie, M. (1984). Territory size in the moorhen (Gallinula chloropus): an outcome of RHP asymmetry between neighbours. Anim. Behav., 32, 861–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Pianka, E. R. (1976). Natural selection of optimal reproductive tactics. Am. Zool., 16, 775–784.Google Scholar
  150. Pianka, E. R. (1988). Evolutionary ecology, (4th ed). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  151. Poole, J. H. (1987). Rutting behavior in African elephants: The phenomenon of musth. Behaviour, 102, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Poole, J. H. (1989a). Announcing intent: the aggressive state of musth in African elephants. Anim. Behav., 37, 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Poole, J. H. (1989b). Mate guarding, reproductive success and female choice in African elephants. Anim. Behav., 37, 842–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Pope, T. R. (1990). The reproductive consequences of male cooperation in the red howler monkey: paternity exclusion in multi-male and single-male troops using genetic markers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 27, 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Popp, J. W. (1988). Effects of experience on agonistic behavior among American goldfinches. Behav. Proc., 16, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Popp, J. L., and DeVore, I. (1979). Aggressive competition and social dominance theory: synopsis. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.), The great apes (pp. 316–338). Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
  157. Prins, H. H. T. (1989). Condition changes and choice of social environment in African buffalo bulls. Behaviour, 108, 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Prins, H. H. T., and Iason, G. R. (1989). Dangerous lions and nonchalant buffalo. Behaviour, 108, 262–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Pusey, A. E., and Packer, C. (1987). Dispersal and philopatry. In Smuts, B. B., et al. (eds.), Primate societies (pp. 250–266). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  160. Raveling, D. G. (1970). Dominance relationships and agonistic behavior of Canada geese in winter. Behaviour, 37, 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Reed, C. A. (1969). The pattern of animal domestication in the prehistoric Near East. In Ucko, P. J., and Dimbleby, G. W. (eds.), The domestication and exploitation of domestic animals (pp. 361–380). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  162. Ribowski, A., and Franck, D. (1993a). Demonstration of strength and concealment of weakness in escalating fights of male swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri). Ethology, 93, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Ribowski, A., and Franck, D. (1993b). Subordinate swordtail males escalate faster than dominants: A failure of the social conditioning principle. Aggressive Behavior, 19, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Richner, H. (1989). Phenotypic correlates of dominance in carrion crows and their effects on access to food. Anim. Behav., 38, 606–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Ricklefs, R. E. (1979). Ecology. New York: Chiron.Google Scholar
  166. Riechert, S. E. (1978). Games spiders play: Behavioral variability in territorial disputes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 3, 135–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Riechert, S. E. (1979). Games spiders play. II. Resource assessment strategies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobioi., 6, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Riechert, S. E. (1988). The energetic costs of fighting. Am. Zool., 28, 877–884.Google Scholar
  169. Robertson, J. G. M. (1986). Male territoriality, fighting and assessment of fighting ability in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Anim. Behav., 34, 763–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Robinson, S. K. (1986a). Competitive and mutualistic interactions among females in a neotropical oriole. Anim. Behav., 34, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Robinson, S. K. (1986b). Benefits, costs, and determinants of dominance in a polygynous oriole. Anim. Behav., 34, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Rockwell, R. F., Findlay, C. S., Cooke, F., and Smith, J. A. (1985). Life history studies of the lesser snow goose (Anser caerulescens caerulescens). IV. The selective value of plumage polymorphism: net viability, the timing of maturation, and breeding propensity. Evolution, 39, 178–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Rohwer, S. (1982). The evolution of reliable and unreliable badges of fighting ability. Am. Zool., 22, 531–546.Google Scholar
  174. Rood, J. P. (1987). Dispersal and intergroup transfer in the dwarf mongoose. In Chepko-Sade, B. D., and Halpin, Z. (eds.), Mammalian dispersal patterns: The effects of social structure on population genetics (pp. 85–102). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  175. Rubenstein, D. I. (1982). Risk, uncertainty and evolutionary strategies. In King’s College Sociobiology Group (eds.), Current problems in sociobiology (pp. 91–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  176. Sapolsky, R. M. (1987). Stress, social status, and reproductive physiology in free-living baboons. In Crews, D. (ed.), Psychology of reproductive behavior: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 291–322). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  177. Scott, J. P., and Fuller, J. L. (1965). Genetics and the social behavior of the dog. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  178. Schaller, G. B. (1972). The Serengeti lion: A study of predator-prey relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  179. Searcy, W. A. (1979). Morphological correlates of dominance in captive male red-winged blackbirds. Condor, 81, 417–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Selye, H. (1971). Hormones and resistance. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Shutler, D., and Weatherhead, P. J. (1991). Owner and floater red-winged blackbirds: Determinants of status. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 28, 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Shutler, D., and Weatherhead, P. J. (1992). Surplus territory contenders in male red-winged blackbirds: Where are the desperados? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 31, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Silk, J. B. (1987). Social behavior in evolutionary perspective. In Smuts, B. B., et al. (eds.), Primate societies (pp. 318–329). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  184. Slater, P. J. B. (1986). Individual differences and dominance hierarchies. Anim. Behav., 34, 1264–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Smith, I. P., Huntingford, F., Atkinson, R. J. A., and Taylor, A. C. (1994). Mate competition in the velvet swimming crab Necora puber—Effects of perceived resource value on male agonistic behaviour. Mar. Biol., 120, 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Smith, I. P., and Taylor, A. C. (1993). The energetic cost of agonistic behaviour in the velvet swimming crab, Necora (= Liocarcinus) puber (L.). Anim. Behav., 45, 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Smith, J. N. M. (1988). Determinants of lifetime reproductive success in the song sparrow. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.), Reproductive success (pp. 154–172). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  188. Smith, J. N. M., and Arcese, P. (1989). How fit are floaters? Consequences of alternative territorial behaviors in a nonmigratory sparrow. Am. Nat., 133, 830–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Smith, S. M. (1978). The “underworld” in a territorial sparrow: adaptive strategy for floaters. Am. Nat., 112, 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Smuts, B. B. (1987). Gender, aggression, and influence. In Smuts, B. B., et al. (eds.), Primate societies (pp. 400–412). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  191. Stamps, J. A. (1987). The effect of familiarity with a neighborhood on territory acquisition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 21, 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Suomi, S. (1983). Models of depression in primates. Psychol. Med., 13, 465–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Sutherland, W. J., and Parker, G. A. (1985). Distribution of unequal competitors. In Sibly, R. M., and Smith, R. H. (eds.), Behavioural ecology (pp. 255–273). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  194. Thornhill, R., and Sauer, P. (1992). Genetic sire effects on the fighting ability of sons and daughters and mating success of sons in a scorpionfly. Anim. Behav., 43, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Thorpe, K. E., Taylor, A. C, and Huntingford, F. A. (1995). How costly is fighting? Physiological effects of sustained exercise and fighting in swimming crabs, Necora puber (L.) (Brachyura, Portunidae). Anim. Behav., 50, 1657–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.), Sexual selection and the decent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  197. van den Berghe, E. P. (1988). Piracy as an alternative reproductive tactic for males. Nature, 334, 697–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Van de Poll, N. E., De Jonge, F., Van Oyen, H. G., and Van Pelt, J. (1982). Aggressive behaviour in rats: effects of winning or losing on subsequent aggressive interactions. Behav. Proc., 7, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Van Noordwijk, M. A., and Van Schaik, C. P. (1985). Male migration and rank acquisition in wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Anim. Behav., 33, 849–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Vehrencamp, S. L. (1979). The roles of individual, kin, and group selection in the evolution of sociality. In Marier, P., and Vandenbergh, J. G. (eds.), Handbook of behavior and communication, Vol. 3 (pp. 351–394). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  201. Vehrencamp, S. L. (1983). A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Anim. Behav., 31, 667–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Verrell, P. A. (1986). Wrestling in the red-spotted newt (Notophthalmus viridescens): resource value and contestant asymmetry determine contest duration and outcome. Anim. Behav., 34, 398–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. Waage, J. K. (1988). Confusion over residency and the escalation of damselfly territorial disputes. Anim. Behav., 36, 586–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Wallen, K., and Wojeiechowski-Metzlar, C. (1985). Social conditioning and dominance in male Betta splendens. Behav. Proc., 11, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Walters, J. R., and Seyfarth, R. M. (1987). Conflict and cooperation. In Smuts, B. B., et al. (eds.), Primate societies (pp. 306–317). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  206. Watson, A., and Moss, R. (1971). Spacing as affected by territorial behavior, habitat and nutrition in red grouse (Lagopus l. scoticus). In Esser, A. H. (ed.), The use of space by animals and men (pp. 92–111). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  207. Wells, M. S. (1988). Effects of body size and resource value on fighting behaviour in a jumping spider. Anim. Behav., 36, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Whitfield, D. P. (1987). Plumage variability, status signaling and individual recognition in avian flocks. TREE, 2, 13–18.Google Scholar
  209. Wickman, P., and Wiklund, C. (1983). Territorial defense and its seasonal decline in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria). Anim. Behav., 31, 1206–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Williams, G. C. (1957). Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution, 11, 398–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Williams, G. C. (1966). Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. Am. Nat., 100, 687–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Wilson, P., and Franklin, W. L. (1985). Male group dynamics and inter-male aggression of guanacos in southern Chile. Z. Tierpsychol., 69, 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. Wingfield, J. C., Ball, G. F., Dufty, A. M., Jr., Hegner, R. E., and Ramenofsky, M. (1987). Testosterone and aggression in birds. Am. Sci., 75, 602–608.Google Scholar
  214. Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty, A. M., Jr., and Ball, G. F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”: theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems and breeding strategies, Am. Nat., 136, 829–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. Worthman, C. M. (1990). Socioendocrinology: key to fundamental synergy. In Ziegler, T. E., and Bercovitch, F. B. (eds.), Socioendocrinology of primate reproduction (pp. 187–212). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  216. Yamagishi, H. (1962). Growth relation in some small experimental populations of rainbow trout fry, Salmo gairdneri Richardson with special reference to social relations among individuals. Jpn. J. Ecol., 12, 43–53.Google Scholar
  217. Yokel, D. A. (1989). Intrasexual aggression and the mating behavior of brown-headed cowbirds: their relation to population densities and sex ratios. Condor, 91, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • William J. HamiltonIII
    • 1
  • John W. McNutt
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Environmental StudiesUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.Wild Dog Research ProjectMaunBotswana

Personalised recommendations