Skip to main content

Abstract

For many mental health professionals, even the thought of becoming involved in a case which may have legal ramifications is unpleasant. Typically, clinicians do not want to deal with attorneys, particularly in an adversary setting. Generally, juggling one’s schedule to meet the unpredictable demands of courtroom appearances is unappealing. The court appearance itself may be seen as highly aversive. The professional may believe that time spent on a legal case is not time well spent. Yet, involvement in a forensic matter is often involuntary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

A. Cases

  • Bartlett v. Weimer, 268 F.2d 860 (7th Cir. 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ake v. Oklahoma, 105 S.Ct. 1087 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren v. Eustermann, 370 N.W.2d 877 (Minn.Sup.Ct. 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michigan v. Tyson, 377 N.W.2d 738 (Mich.Sup.Ct. 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewington v. Texas, 702 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.App. 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Iowa v. Chancy, 391 N.W.2d 231 (Iowa Sup.Ct. 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutphin v. Piatt, 720 S.W.2d 455 (Tenn.Sup.Ct. 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trower v. Jones, 500 N.E.2d 1134 (Hl.App. 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell v. Hart, 516 So.2d 562 (Ala.Sup.Ct. 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogdell v. Brown, 531 A.2d 1379 (N.J.Super. 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polo by Shipley v. Gotchel, 542 A.2d 947 (N.J. 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross v. Lakeview Center, 529 So.2d 307 (Fla.App. 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio v. Makover, 536 A.2d 595 (Conn.App. 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ex Parte Morris v. Craddock, 530 So.2d 785 (Ala.Sup.Ct. 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Bar v. Harris, 531 So.2d 151 (Fla.Sup.Ct. 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolisano v. Texon, 533 N.Y.S.2d 874 (A.D. 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plitt v. Griggs, 585 So.2d 1317 (Ala.Sup.Ct. 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Annotation: Right of accused in criminal prosecution to presence of counsel at court-appointed or approved psychiatric examination, 3 A.L.R.4th 910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annotation: Physician’s negligence in conducting or reporting physical examination as rendering him liable to third person relying thereon, 24 A.L.R.4th 1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annotation: Propriety of cross-examining expert witness regarding his status as “professional witness” 39 A.L.R.4th 742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annotation: Right of independent expert to refuse to testify as to expert opinion, 50 A.L.R.4th 680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annotation: Compelling testimony of opponent’s expert in state court, 66 A.L.R.4th 213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annotation: Attorney’s personal liability for expenses incurred in relation to services for client, 66 A.L.R.4th 256.

    Google Scholar 

B. Articles and Books

  • American Bar Association. (1989). American Bar Association Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S. (1987). In the wake of Ake: The ethics of expert testimony in an advocate’s world. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 15, 15–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Black, B. (1988). Evolving legal standards for the admissibility of scientific evidence. Science, 239, 1508–1512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. P., Gedrich, A. E., Jacoby, S. E., Tardy, M. J., & Tyson, K. B. (1986). Forensic social work: Practice and vision. Social Casework, 67, 340–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, S. L. (1991). Testifying in court: Guidelines and maxims for the expert witness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, W. J., McGarry, A. L., & Shah, S. A. (Eds.). (1986). Forensic psychiatry and psychology: Perspectives and standards for interdisciplinary practice. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, B. L. (1983). The psychiatrist as expert witness. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 6, 597–609.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, B. J., & Litwack, T. R. (1974). Psychiatry and the presumption of expertise: Flipping coins in the courtroom. California Law Review, 62, 693–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., & Ziskin, J. (1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry. Science, 241, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, R. L. (1988). Consequences of surveillance of the forensic psychiatric examination: An Overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 1243–1247.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gothard, S. (1989). Power in the court: The social worker as an expert witness. Social Work, 34, 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1987). The economic and scientific future of forensic psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 42, 831–839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1987). Psychological assessments for legal decisions. In D. Weisstub (Ed.), Law and mental health, Vol. 3, pp. 125–257. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, K. (1992). The role of psychological testing in forensic assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. F. (1986). How to write a psychiatric report for litigation following a personal injury. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 164–169.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holleman, W. L., & Holleman, M. C. (1988). School and work release evaluations. Journal of American Medical Association, 260, 3629–3634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunn, C. M. (1984). The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 100, 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1987). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, S., & Schwartz, H. I. (1988). The presence of counsel at forensic psychiatric examinations. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 33, 1008–1014.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (1986). Conducting insanity evaluations. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (Ed.). (1988). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, M. J. (1990). Expert witnesses, nonexpert witnesses, and non witness experts. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, D. W. (Ed.). (1986). Psychiatric and psychological evidence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovenko, R. (1987). The lawyer and the forensic expert: Boundaries of ethical practice. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 119–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R. (1989). Mental health expert witnesses: Of science and crystal balls. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 145–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasyliw, O. E., Cavanaugh, J. L., Jr., & Rogers, R. (1985). Beyond the scientific limits of expert testimony. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 13, 147–158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziskin, J., & Faust, D. (1988). Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony (4th ed.). Marina Del Ray, CA: Law & Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weiner, B.A., Wettstein, R.M. (1993). Involvement with Litigation. In: Legal Issues in Mental Health Care. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1654-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1654-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1656-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1654-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics