Abstract
Quantum orthogonal groups, quantum Lorentz group and their corresponding quantum algebras are of special interest for modern physics [1–4]. M. Jimbo [5] and V. Drinfeld [6] defined q-deformations (quantum algebras) U q (g)for all simple complex Lie algebras gby means of Cartan subalgebras and root subspaces. Reshetikhin, Takhtajan and Faddeev [7] defined quantum algebras U q (g)in terms of the universal R-matrix. However, none of these approaches is able to give a satisfactory presentation of the quantum algebra U q (so(n,ℂ)) from a viewpoint of some problems in quantum physics and representation theory. In fact, several important problems of theoretical physics demand to define an action of the quantum Lorentz group SO q (n,1) and of the corresponding quantum algebra (the real forms of the quantum group SO q (n+ 1, ℂ) and of the quantum algebra U q (so(n+ 1, ℂ)) respectively) upon the quantum (n + 1)-dimensional linear space. The approaches mentioned above are not satisfactory for such definition. Besides, when considering representations of the quantum groups SO q (n +1) and SO q (n,1) we are interested in reducing them onto the quantum subgroup SO q (n). This reduction would give the analog of the Gel’fand-Tsetlin basis for these representations. However, definitions of quantum algebras mentioned above do not allow the inclusions SO q (n+ 1) ⊃SO q (n)and U q (so(n,l)) ⊃U q (so(n)). To be able to exploit such reductions we have to consider q-deformations of the Lie algebra so(n+ 1, ℂ) defined in terms of the generators I k,k−1= E k,k−1−E k−1,k (where E is is the matrix with elements (E is ) rt = δirδ st ) rather than by means of Cartan subalgebras and root elements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
U. Carow-Watamura, M. Schlieker, and S. Watamura, Z. Phys., C 48, 159 (1991); C 49, 439 (1991).
P. Podles and S. L. Woronowicz, Comm. Math. Phys., 130,381 (1990).
U. Carow-Watamura, M. Schlieker, M. Scholl, and S. Watamura, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 6, 3081 (1991).
W. B. Schmidke, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, Z. Phys. C, 52, 471 (1991).
M. Jimbo, Lett. Math. Phys., 10,63 (1985).
V. G. Drinfeld, Sov. Math. Dokl., 32,254 (1985).
N. Yu. Reshetikhin, L. A. Takhtajan, and L. D. Faddeev, Leningrad Math. J., 1, 193 (1990).
A. M. Gavrilik and A. U. Klimyk, Lett. Math. Phys., 21,215 (1991).
D. B. Fairlie, J. Phys. A, 23, L183 (1990).
A. Odesskii, Func. Anal. Appl., 20,152 (1986).
M. Noumi, Adv. in Math., 123,16 (1996).
A. U. Klimyk and K. Schmüdgen, Quantum Groups and Their Representations(Springer, Berlin, 1998).
I. M. Gel’fand and M. L. Tsetlin, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 71, 825 (1950).
A. M. Gavrilik and A. U. Klimyk, J. Math. Phys., 35, 3670 (1994).
A. Sciarrino, J. Phys. A, 27, 7403 (1994)
J. Van der Jeugt, Can. J. Phys., 72, 215 (1994)
P. P. Raychev, R. P. Roussev, P. A. Terziev, D. Bonatsos, and N. Lo Indice, J. Phys. A, 29, 6939 (1996).
Yu. S. Samoilenko and L. B. Turowska, Reps. Math. Phys., (to appear).
A. M. Gavrilik, Teor. Matem. Fiz., 95, 251 (1993).
A. M. Gavrilik and N. Z. Iorgov, “Methods of Functional Analysis and Topology” (to be published).
M. Havlicek, A. U. Klimyk, and E. Pelantova, Hadronic J., 20, (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gavrilik, A.M., Iorgov, N.Z., Klimyk, A.U. (1998). Nonstandard Deformation U′ q (so n ): The Imbedding U′ q (so n ) ⊂ U q (sl n ) and Representations. In: Gruber, B., Ramek, M. (eds) Symmetries in Science X. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1537-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1537-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1539-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1537-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive