From Equations of Motion to Canonical Commutation Relations: Classical and Quantum Systems

  • V. I. Man’ko
  • G. Marmo
  • F. Zaccaria

Abstract

We consider equations of motion for classical and quantum systems. It is shown that they do not determine uniquely the canonical commutation relations, neither at the classical level, nor at the quantum level. By using some of the alternative commutation relations as deformed ones, we consider the description of deformed systems, classical and quantum. In particular, by using deformed oscillators we deal with photon statistics in nonlinear coherent states and possible influence of deformations on electrostatics.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Abraham and J. Marsden, Foundations of Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1978)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. G. Marmo, E. J. Saletan, A. Simoni, and B. Vitale, Dynamical Systems, a Differential Geometric Approach to Symmetry and Reduction(Wiley, New York, 1985)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Libermann and C. M. Marie, Symplectic Geometry and Analytical Mechanics(D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [2]
    G. Marmo and G. Morandi, “Some geometry and topology,” in: Low-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories for Condensed Matter Physicists, Eds.: S. Lundgvist, G. Morandi, and Yu Lu (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995).Google Scholar
  5. [3]
    V. V. Dodonov and V. I. Man’ko, Invariants and Evolution of Nonstationary Quantum Systems, Proceedings of the Lebedev Physical Institute (Nova Science, New York, 1989), Vol. 183Google Scholar
  6. I. A. Malkin and V. I. Man’ko, Dynamical Symmetries and Coherent States of Quantum Systems (Nauka, Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. [4]
    V. I. Man’ko and G. Marmo, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 7, 3411 (1992).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [5]
    G. Landi, G. Marmo, and G. Vilasi, J. Group Theory in Physics (Nova Science), 2, 1 (1994).Google Scholar
  9. [6]
    A. P. Balachandran, G. Marmo, A. Simoni, A. Stern, and F. Zaccaria, “On a classical description of massless particles,” in: Proceedings of ISATQP, Shanxi, 1992, Eds.: J. Q. Liang, M. L. Wang, S. N. Qiao, and D. C. Su (Science Press, New York, 1993).Google Scholar
  10. [7]
    P. A. M. Dirac, Lectures in Quantum Mechanics, Belfer Graduate School of Science (Yeshiva University, New York, 1964).Google Scholar
  11. [8]
    J. Grabowski, G. Landi, G, Marmo, and G. Vilasi, Fortschr. Phys., 42,393 (1994).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [9]
    A. P. Balachandran, T. R. Govindarajan, and B. Vijayalakshmi, Phys. Rev. D, 18,1951 (1978).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [10]
    B. A. Dubrovin, M. Giordano, G. Marmo, and A. Simoni, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 8, 3747 (1993).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [11]
    M. Giordano, G. Marmo, and C. Rubano, Inverse Problems, 9, 443 (1993).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [12]
    B. A. Dubrovin, G. Marmo, and A. Simoni, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 5, 1229 (1990).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [13]
    L. C. Biedenharn, J. Phys. A, 22, L873 (1989).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [14]
    V. I. Man’ko, G. Marmo, E. C. G. Sudarshan, and F. Zaccaria, “f-Oscillators,” in: Proceedings of the IY Wigner Symposium,Guadalajara, Mexico, July 1995,” Eds.: N. M. Atakishiyev, T. M. Seligman, and K.-B. Wolf (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996), p. 421.Google Scholar
  18. [15]
    R. L. de Matos Filho and W. Vogel, Phys. Rev. A, 54,4560 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [16]
    V. I. Man’ko, G., Marmo, E. C. G. Sudarshan, and F. Zaccaria, Phys. Scripta, 55,528 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [17]
    O. V. Man’ko, Phys. Lett. A, 228,29 (1997).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [18]
    C. Quesne, Phys. Lett. A, 193,245 (1994).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [19]
    C. Daskaloyannis, J. Phys. A, 24, L789 (1991); 25, 2261 (1992).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [20]
    R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. Lett., 10, 84 (1963).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [21]
    E. C. G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. Lett., 10, 277 (1963).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [22]
    R. Löpez-Peña, V. I. Man’ko, G. Marmo, E. C. G. Sudarshan, and F. Zaccaria, “Photon distributions for nonlinear coherent states” (in preparation).Google Scholar
  26. [23]
    S. Wallentovitz and W. Vogel, Phys. Rev. A, 55,4438 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [24]
    U. M. Titulaer and R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev., 145,1041 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [25]
    Z. Bialynicka-Birula, Phys. Rev., 173,1207 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [26]
    Ch. A. Nelson, in: Symmetries in Science VI, Ed.: B. Gruber (Plenum Press, New York, 1993), p. 523.Google Scholar
  30. [27]
    E. C. G. Sudarshan, Int. J, Theor. Phys., 32,1069 (1993).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [28]
    E. Wigner, Phys. Rev., 40, 749 (1932).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [29]
    K. Husimi, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn, 23,264 (1940)Google Scholar
  33. Y. Kano, J. Math. Phys., 6, 1913 (1965).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [30]
    C. L. Mehta and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. B, 138,274 (1965).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [31]
    V. V. Dodonov, E. V. Kurmyshev, and V. I. Man’ko, Phys. Lett. A, 79,150 (1980).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [32]
    E. C. G. Sudarshan, Charles B. Chiu, and G. Bhamathi, Phys. Rev. A, 52,43 (1995).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [33]
    V. D. Dodonov, O. V. Man’ko, and V. I. Man’ko, Phys. Rev. A, 49, 2993 (1994); 50, 813 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [34]
    E. Schrödinger, Ber. Kgl. Akad. Wiss., 296(1930).Google Scholar
  39. [35]
    H. P. Robertson, Phys. Rev., 35,667 (1930).Google Scholar
  40. [36]
    V. I. Man’ko, G. Marmo, E. C. G. Sudarshan, and F. Zaccaria, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 11,1281 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [37]
    R. López-Peña, V. I. Man’ko, and G. Marmo, “Wigner problem for a precessing magnetic dipole,” Phys. Rev. A (1997, to appear).Google Scholar
  42. [38]
    V. I. Man’ko, G. Marmo, S. Solimeno, and F. Zaccaria, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 8, 3577 (1993); Phys. Lett. A, 176, 173 (1993); “Q-nonlinearity of electromagnetic field and deformed Planck distribution,” in: Technical Digests of EQEC’93-EQUAP93(Florence, September 1993), Eds.: P. De Natale, R. Meucci, and S. Pel-li, Vol. 2.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [39]
    G. Marmo, G. Morandi, and C. Rubano, “Symmetries in the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism: the equivariant inverse problem,” in: Symmetries in Science III, Eds.: B. Gruber and F. Iachello (Plenum Press, New York, 1989), p. 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. G. Morandi, C. Ferrario, G. Lo Vecchio, G. Marmo, and C. Rubano, Phys. Reports, 188,149 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. V. I. Man’ko, G. Marmo, P. Vitale, and F. Zaccaria, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 9, 5541 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. J. F. Carinena, L. A. Ibort, G. Marmo, and A. Stern, Phys. Reports, 155,149 (1995)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  47. A. Ibort, V. I. Man’ko, G. Marmo, and F. Zaccaria “The inverse problem for quantum and classical systems: from the classical equations of motion to the quantum commutation relations,” in: GROUP21. Physical Applications and Mathematical Aspects of Geometry, Groups, and Algebras, Eds.: H.-D. Doebner, W. Scherer, and P. Nattermann (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), Vol. 1, p. 265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. I. Man’ko
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Marmo
    • 1
  • F. Zaccaria
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze FisicheUniversitá di Napoli “Federico II”, Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di NapoliNapoliItaly
  2. 2.Lebedev Physical InstituteMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations