Advertisement

Between-Subjects Designs and Nonexperimental Methods

  • Alan Poling
  • Laura L. Methot
  • Mark G. LeSage
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)

Abstract

Between-subjects designs provide alternatives to within-subject strategies for arranging experimental conditions. As Kazdin (1982) points out, between-subjects designs are not favored by behavior analysts. Johnston and Pennypacker (1993b), for example, assert that between-subjects designs do not obtain useful information on functional relationships, nor do they result in findings that are meaningfully generalized to individuals who have not actually been studied. Criticisms of between-subjects approaches to research are based on the manner in which the independent variable is manipulated, how often dependent variables characteristically are measured, and how data usually are analyzed.

Keywords

Behavior Analysis Applied Behavior Analysis Dent Variable Behavior Analyst Archival Record 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Poling
    • 1
  • Laura L. Methot
    • 1
  • Mark G. LeSage
    • 1
  1. 1.Western Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA

Personalised recommendations