Impact and Economic Threshold of Thrips tabaci on Onions

  • François Fournier
  • Guy Boivin
  • Robin K. Stewart
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 276)

Abstract

Heavy onion thrips, Thrips tabaci, infestations resulted in onion yield losses of 43 and 34.5% in 1988 and 1989, respectively. No impact on yield was observed in 1990, a season with low thrips densities. The relationship between damage and yield was best described by non-linear models. Differences in the onion plant response to thrips damage were observed between 1988 and 1989, which were linked with the duration and intensity of the seasonal water deficit. Economic thresholds of 2.2 and 0.9 thrips per leaf were estimated for 1988 and 1989, respectively. These thresholds can be used for onions sold at harvest or stored because costs associated with storage are compensated by a higher return price. The use in 1990 of the 0.9 thrips per leaf economic threshold would have resulted in unnecessary pesticide treatment making this threshold suitable only for severe drought situations.

Keywords

Hydrazin Cypermethrin Cumi Cymbush 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Conseil des Productions Végétales du Québec (C.P.V.Q.). 1987. Légumes, Protection. Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pecheries et de l’Alimentation, Agdex 250-605.Google Scholar
  2. Edelson, J. V., B. Cartwright & T. A. Royer. 1986. Distribution and impact of Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on onion. J. Econ. Entomol. 79: 502–505.Google Scholar
  3. Edelson, J. V., B. Cartwright & T. A. Royer. 1989. Economics of controlling onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on onions with insecticides in South Texas. J. Econ. Entomol. 82: 561–564.Google Scholar
  4. Fenemore, P. G. 1982. Plant pests and their control. Wellington, NZ, Butterworths.Google Scholar
  5. Harding, J. A. 1961. Studies on the control of thrips attacking onions. J. Econ. Entomol. 54: 1254–1255.Google Scholar
  6. Huber, P. J. 1964. Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann. Math. Stat. 35: 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kendall, D. M. & J. L. Capinera. 1987. Susceptibility of onion growth stages to onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) damage and mechanical defoliation. Environ. Entomol. 16: 859–863.Google Scholar
  8. Kvalseth, T. O. 1985. Cautionary note about R2. Am. Stat. 39: 279–285.Google Scholar
  9. Passlow, T. 1957. Control of Thrips tabaci Lind, in onion crops in the Lockyer Valley. Queensl. J. Agric. Sci. 14: 53–72.Google Scholar
  10. Pedigo, L. P., S. H. Hutchins & L. G. Higley. 1986. Economic injury levels in theory and practice. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 31: 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Quartey, S. W. 1982. Population dynamics of the onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lind., on onions. Ph.D. thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
  12. Shelton, A. M., J. P. Nyrop, R. C. North, C. Petzoldt & R. Foster. 1987. Development and use of a dynamic sequential sampling program for onion thrips, Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), on onions. J. Econ. Entomol. 80: 1051–1056.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • François Fournier
    • 1
  • Guy Boivin
    • 2
  • Robin K. Stewart
    • 1
  1. 1.Natural Resource Sciences DepartmentMacdonald College of McGill UniversitySte-Anne-de-BellevueCanada
  2. 2.Agriculture CanadaSt-Jean-sur-RichelieuCanada

Personalised recommendations