Resources to Implement Biological Control in Greenhouses

  • Robert J. Jacobson
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 276)

Abstract

Pest control strategies available to growers, and the factors which influence their choice, are examined to determine whether low pesticide input systems offer a realistic option in commercial horticulture. It is concluded that biological control programs alone are rarely acceptable in glasshouse crops due to their complex management and the consequences of failure. However, integrated pest management (IPM) based largely on biological techniques with only minimal use of selective pesticides is an attractive option. Future developments, which could accelerate the acceptance of IPM, are discussed.

Keywords

Income Nicotine Marketing Expense Smoke 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Chambers, R. J., S. Long & N. L. Helyer. 1993. Effectiveness of Orius laevigatus (Hem: Anthocoridae) for the control of Frankliniella occidentalis on cucumber and pepper in the United Kingdom. Biocontrol Sci. and Tech. 3: 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Flaherty, A. 1993. Pander to your predators. Grower. Feb. 11, 1993: 21–23.Google Scholar
  3. Helyer, N., G. Gill, A. Bywater & R. J. Chambers. 1992. Elevated humidities for control of chrysanthemum pests with Verticillium lecanii. Pest. Sci. 36:373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jacobson, R. 1992. Integrated pest management in spring bedding plants. A successful package for commercial crops, pp. 105-112. In Proceedings, IOBC Workshop “IPM in greenhouse ornamentals,” 8-11 September 1992, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  5. 1993. Control of Frankliniella occidentalis with Orius majusculus: Experiences during the first full season of commercial use in the UK, pp. 81-84. In Proc. IOBC Working Group, IPM Glasshouses, 25-29 April 1993, Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
  6. McDonald, O. 1995. A survey of the response of UK populations of western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) to dichlorvos and malathion. In B. L. Parker, M. Skinner & T. Lewis [eds.], Thrips biology and management, Proc, The 1993 International Conference on Thysanoptera, 28-30 Sept. 1993, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
  7. Mollema, C, M. M. Steenhuis, H. Inggamer & C. Soria. 1993. Evaluating the resistance to Frankliniella occidentalis in cucumber: methods, genotypic variation and effects upon thrips biology, pp. 77-82. In Proceedings, IOBC Working Group, Resistance Breeding, 13-16 Sept. 1992, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Pickford, R.J.J. 1982. A selective method of thrips control in cucumbers, pp. 177-180. In Proc., IOBC Working Group, IPM Glasshouses, 27-29 July 1982, Darmstadt, West GermanyGoogle Scholar
  9. van Emden, H. F. 1990. The interaction of host plant resistance to insects with other control measures, pp 939-948. In Proc., Brighton Crop Protection Conf. — Pest and Disease — 1990, 19-22 November 1990, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  10. van Lenteren, J. C. 1993. Quality control for natural enemies used in greenhouses, pp. 89-92. In Proc, IOBC Working Group, IPM Glasshouses, 25-29 April 1993, Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Walton, S. 1992. Safer foods on the shelf. Grower. July 23 1992: 11–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Jacobson
    • 1
  1. 1.Horticulture Research InternationalCawood, SelbyUK

Personalised recommendations