Less-conventional Magnetic Domain Investigations

  • Michel Schlenker
  • José Baruchel
  • Yves Souche


A review is given of investigations carried out by the authors over the last few years on various types of domains using diverse probes, viz.: a) antiferromagnetic domains, especially 180° and chirality domains, directly observed by neutron diffraction topography, i.e. through images obtained from a Bragg-diffracted beam, b) phase coexistence at ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic first order phase transitions, as seen by neutron and synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction topography, c) Imry and Ma domains in thin films of amorphous Tb-Co, observed by electron microscopy, d) use of the transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect (TMOKE) in diffraction of light by periodic arrays of thin, small (μm-scale) ferromagnetic islands, where information about the mean domain distribution in an applied magnetic field is obtained from the variation in intensity of the diffracted beams.


Synchrotron Radiation Diffract Beam Kerr Effect Easy Magnetization Direction Ferromagnetic Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A recent overview of the subject is given in Neutron and Synchrotron Radiation for Condensed Matter Studies, Vol. 1: Theory, Instruments and Methods. HERCULES (Higher Research Course for Users of Large Experimental Systems), Grenoble. Edited by J. Baruchel, J. L. Hodeau, M. S. Lehmann, J. R. Regnard, C. Schlenker. Les Editions de Physique and Springer-Verlag (1993).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Baruchel, p. 399-409 in ref. 1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Schlenker and C.G. Shull, J. Appl. Phys., 44, 4181 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Baruchel, M. Schlenker, and W. L. Roth, J. Appl. Phys., 48, 5 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. L. Roth, J. Appl. Phys., 31, 2000 (1960)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. G. A. Slack, J. Appl. Phys., 31, 1571 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    M. Ando and S. Hosoya, Phys. Rev. Lett., 29, 281 (1972); J. Appl. Phys., 49, 6045 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    A. S. Borovik-Romanov, Sov. Phys. JETP, 11, 786 (1960).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    J. Baruchel, M. Schlenker, and S. B. Palmer, Nondestr. Test. Eval., 5, 349 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    This was done in CoF2, where the magnetic birefringence effect is larger than in MnF2, by N. F. Kharchenko, V. V. Eremenko, and L. I. Belyi, Sov. Phys. JETP Lett., 29, 393 (1979).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    J. Baruchel, S. B. Palmer, and M. Schlenker, J. de Physique, 42, 1279 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    K. Siratori, J. Akimitsu, E. Kita, and M. Nishi, J. Phys. Soc. Jap., 48, 1111 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    J. Miltat and M. Kléman, J. Appl. Phys., 50, 7695 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 13.
    J. Sandonis, J. Baruchel, M. Schlenker, and A. Pearce, J. Mag. Mag. Mater., 104-107, 347 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    E. E. Huber and D. H. Ridgley, Phys. Rev. A, 135, 1033 (1964).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    M. Kléman and M. Schlenker, J. Appl. Phys., 43, 3184 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 16.
    A. G. Khachaturyan: Theory of Structural Transformations in Solids, (Wiley, 1983).Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    M. Polcarova and J. Gemperlova, Phys. Stat. Sol., 32, 769 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    J. Baruchel, Y. Epelboin, J. Gastaldi, J. Härtwig, J. Kulda, P. Režmankova, M. Schlenker, and F. Zontone, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 141, 59 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    M. Polcarova and A. R. Lang, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1, 13 (1962); Bull. Soc. Fr. Minér. Crist., 91, 645 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 20.
    M. Schlenker, P. Brissonneau, and J. P. Perrier, Bull. Soc. Fr. Minér. Crist., 91, 653 (1968)Google Scholar
  22. M. Schlenker and M. Kléman, J. de Phys., 32, C1–256 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 21.
    C. Cm. Wu and B. Roessler, J. Appl. Phys., 42, 1814 (1971); Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 8, 571 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 22.
    M. Kuriyama, W. J. Boettinger, and H. E. Burdette, J. Cryst. Growth, 43, 287 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 23.
    T. Tuomi, K. Naukkarinen, and P. Rabe, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 25, 93 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 24.
    A. Authier, in Vol. II of Diffraction and Imaging Techniques in Materials Science, Ed. by S. Amelinckx, R. Gevers, J. van Landuyt. 2nd ed. (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1978)Google Scholar
  27. 25.
    Y. Imry and S. K. Ma, Phys. Rev. Let., 35, 1399 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 26.
    J. Chappert, in Magnetism of Metals and Alloys, Ed. M. Cyrot, (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982) p. 487.Google Scholar
  29. 27.
    D. Givord, A. Liénard, J. P. Rebouillat, and J. Schweizer, Physica, 130B, 351 (1985).Google Scholar
  30. 28.
    M. Schlenker, J. Pélissier, B. Barbara, J. P. Guigay, G. Fillion, R. H. Geiss, A. Liénard, and B. Blanchard, J. de Physique, 51, 483 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 29.
    E. M. Chudnovsky, J. Appl. Phys., 64, 5770 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 30.
    J. Cullen, J. Appl. Phys., 61, 4413 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 31.
    A. V. Sokolov, Optical Properties of Metals. In Russian: FM, Moscow (1961); in English: Blackie & Sons (1967)Google Scholar
  34. 32.
    H. Boersch and M. Lambeck, Zeitschr. für Phys., 177, 157 (1964); M. Lambeck, ibid., 179, 161 (1964).Google Scholar
  35. 33.
    Y. Souche, J. M. Alameda, O. Cugat, D. Givord, and A. Liénard, Proc. Symposium on Materials for magneto-optic data storage, ed. by C.J. Robinson, T. Suzuki, and C. M. Falco. MRS, San Diego, April 1989.Google Scholar
  36. 34.
    Š. Višňovský, Czech. J. Phys., B36, 625 (1986); J. Zak, E. R. Moog, C. Liu, and S. D. Bader, Phys. Rev. B, 43, 6423 (1991); R. Atkinson and P. H. Lissberger, J. Mag. Mag. Mater., 118, 271 (1993).Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    G. Pénissard, Thèse, Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay (France), July 1993 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  38. 36.
    O. Geoffroy, D. Givord, Y. Otani, B. Pannetier, and F. Ossart, J. Mag. Mag. Mater., 121, 223 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 37.
    O. Geoffroy, D. Givord, Y. Otani, B. Pannetier, A. D. Santos, M. Schlenker, and Y. Souche, J. Mag. Mag. Mater., 121, 516 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 38.
    R. Petit, in In-Process Optical Measurements and Industrial Methods, SPIE Vol. 1266, p. 2-19 (1990); D. A. Gremaux, N. C. Gallagher, Appl. Opt., 32, 1948 (1993).Google Scholar
  41. 39.
    T. Baumbach and Y. Souche, unpublished.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michel Schlenker
    • 1
  • José Baruchel
    • 2
  • Yves Souche
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire Louis Néel du CNRSAssocié à l’Université Joseph FourierGrenoble Cedex 9France
  2. 2.European Synchrotron Radiation FacilityGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations