Advertisement

Efficacy, Agency, and Self-Esteem

Emerging Themes and Future Directions
  • Michael H. Kernis
Part of the The Springer Series in Social Clinical Psychology book series (SSSC)

Abstract

A perusal of the self-esteem literature will reveal an abundance of research that focuses on the differences between low and high self-esteem individuals with respect to their perceptions of and reactions to positive and negative events. Questions that have received considerable attention over the years include these: Do high self-esteem persons self-enhance in response to positive events and self-protect in response to threatening events more than do low self-esteem persons? Are there self-esteem differences in the tendency to seek out positive vs. negative self-relevant information or to embrace positive or negative self-aspects? Such questions are important and deserving of the attention that they have received. Unfortunately, however, the emphasis on them has left some gaps in our understanding of self-esteem processes. It is hoped that the diversity of issues addressed in this volume will foster an expansion of the types of questions focused on by people who are interested in self-esteem. Though time will tell how successful this endeavor has been, my experience editing this book has convinced me more than ever that such expansion is both necessary and viable.

Keywords

Emerge Theme Entity Theorist Life Task Terror Management Theory Evaluatively Integrate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barkow, J. (1980). Prestige and self-esteem: A biosocial interpretation. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Stayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.), Dominance relations (pp. 319–332). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1990). Anxiety and social exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumgardner, A. H. (1990). To know oneself is to like oneself: Self-certainty and self-affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1062–1072.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgardner, A. H., & Brownlee, E. A. (1987). Strategic failure in social interaction: Evidence for expectancy disconfirmation processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burger, J. M. (1984). Desire for control, locus of control and proneness to depression. Journal of Personality, 52, 71–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burger, J. M., & Arkin, R. M. (1980). Prediction, control and learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 482–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1990). Anxiety concerning social exclusion: Innate response or one consequence of the need for terror management? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 202–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self-realization. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Kernis, M. H. (1993). The roles of stability and level of self-esteem in psychological functioning. In R. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 167–182). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kernis, M. H., Grannemann, B. D., & Barclay, L. C. (1992). Stability of self-esteem: Assessment, correlates, and excuse making. Journal of Personality, 60, 621–644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larsen, R. J. (1984). Theory and measurement of affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic. Dissertation Abstracts International, 85, 2297B (University Microfilms No. 84-22112).Google Scholar
  15. Linden, W., Paulhus, D. L., & Dobson, K. S. (1986). Effects of response styles on the report of psychological and somatic distress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 309–313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measurement of personality and social psychological attitudes, Vol. 1 (pp. 17–60). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1992). Attribution and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Google Scholar
  18. Rosenberg, M. (1986). Self-concept from middle childhood through adolescence. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self, Vol. 3 (pp. 107–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Swann, W. B. (1990). To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 2, Foundations of social behavior (pp. 408–448). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Swann, W. B., Hixon, J. G., Stein-Seroussi, A., & Gilbert, D. T. (1990). The fleeting gleam of praise: Cognitive processes underlying behavioral reactions to self-relevant feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 17–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (1993). The puzzles of self-esteem: A clinical perspective. In R. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  22. Wells, A. J. (1988). Variations in mothers’ self-esteem in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 661–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael H. Kernis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Institute for Behavioral ResearchUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations