Efficacy, Agency, and Self-Esteem
A perusal of the self-esteem literature will reveal an abundance of research that focuses on the differences between low and high self-esteem individuals with respect to their perceptions of and reactions to positive and negative events. Questions that have received considerable attention over the years include these: Do high self-esteem persons self-enhance in response to positive events and self-protect in response to threatening events more than do low self-esteem persons? Are there self-esteem differences in the tendency to seek out positive vs. negative self-relevant information or to embrace positive or negative self-aspects? Such questions are important and deserving of the attention that they have received. Unfortunately, however, the emphasis on them has left some gaps in our understanding of self-esteem processes. It is hoped that the diversity of issues addressed in this volume will foster an expansion of the types of questions focused on by people who are interested in self-esteem. Though time will tell how successful this endeavor has been, my experience editing this book has convinced me more than ever that such expansion is both necessary and viable.
KeywordsEmerge Theme Entity Theorist Life Task Terror Management Theory Evaluatively Integrate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barkow, J. (1980). Prestige and self-esteem: A biosocial interpretation. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Stayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.), Dominance relations (pp. 319–332). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
- Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self-realization. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Larsen, R. J. (1984). Theory and measurement of affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic. Dissertation Abstracts International, 85, 2297B (University Microfilms No. 84-22112).Google Scholar
- Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measurement of personality and social psychological attitudes, Vol. 1 (pp. 17–60). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1992). Attribution and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. (1986). Self-concept from middle childhood through adolescence. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self, Vol. 3 (pp. 107–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Swann, W. B. (1990). To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 2, Foundations of social behavior (pp. 408–448). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (1993). The puzzles of self-esteem: A clinical perspective. In R. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar