Advertisement

Assessment of Cognitive/Intellectual Functioning

  • Glen P. Aylward
Part of the Critical Issues in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics book series (CIDB)

Abstract

A wide variety of psychological test instruments exist that are used to evaluate intellectual functioning. The description of instruments that follows is not all inclusive; rather, it focuses on tests that are used most frequently in clinical practice and that the primary-care physician will most likely come in contact with (see Table 7.1).

Keywords

Face Sheet Psychological Corporation Quantitative Reasoning Sound Symbol Kaufman Assessment Battery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wechsler, D., 1989, Manual for the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sattler, J. M., 1982, Assessment of Children’s Intelligence and Special Abilities, ed. 2, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gyurke, J. S., 1990, The assessment of preschool children with the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence—Revised, in: The Psychoeducational Assessment of Preschool Children (B. A. Bracken, ed.), Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bracken, B. A., 1992, Review of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence—Revised, in: The Eleventh Mental Measurements Yearbook (J. J. Kramer and J. Close-Conoley, eds.), University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Psychological Corporation, 1989, WPPSI-R. A Technical Report, 1:1–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Psychological Corporation, 1990, WPPSI-R. A Technical Report, 2:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slate, J. R., and Saddler, C. D., 1990, The WPPSI-R: Comments and review. Improved but not perfect, Natl. Assoc. School Psychol. Commun. 1Oct:20.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bracken, B. A., 1990, The WPPSI-R: Comments and review. Improved but not perfect., Natl. Assoc. School Psychol Commun. Oct:21–22.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wechsler, D., 1974, Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised, The Psychological Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wechsler, D., 1981, Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised, The Psychological Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaufman, A. S., 1976, A four-test short form of the WISC-R, Contemp. Ed. Psychol. 1:189–196.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaufman, A. S., 1979, Intelligent Testing with the WISC-R, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reynolds, C. R., and Kaufman, A. S., 1990, Assessment of children’s intelligence with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised (WISC-R), in: Handbook of Psychological & Educational Assessment of Children (C. R. Reynolds and R. W. Kamphaus, eds.), Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bannatyne, A., 1974, Diagnosis: A note on recategorization of the WISC scale scores, J. Learn. Dis. 1:272–274.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wechsler, D., 1991, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Third Edition Manual, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flynn, J. R., 1987, Massive IQ gains in 14 countries. What IQ tests really measure, Psychol. Bull. 101:171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hieronymus, A. N., and Hoover, H. D., 1986, Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Form G, Riverside Publishing, Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    CTB/McGraw-Hill, 1988, California Achievement Tests, Form E, McGraw-Hill, Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prescott, G. A., Balow, I. H., Hogan, T. P., and Farr, R. C., 1986, Metropolitan Achievement Test (ed. 6), The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., and Sattler, J. M., 1986, Guide for Administering and Scoring the Fourth Edition. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Riverside Publishing, Chicago.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., and Sattler, J. M., 1986, Technical Manual. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (ed. 4), Riverside Publishing, Chicago.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Delaney, E. A., and Hopkins, T. F., 1987, The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition. Examiner’s Handbook, Riverside Publishing, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Glutting, J. J., and Kaplan, D. D., 1990, Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition: Making the case for reasonable interpretations, in: Handbook of Psychological and Educational Assessment of Children. Intelligence and Achievement (C. R. Reynolds and R. W. Kamphaus, eds.), Guilford Press, New York, pp. 277–295.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McCallum, R. S., 1991, The assessment of preschool children with the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition, in: The Psychoeducational Assessment of Preschool Children (ed. 2) (B. A. Bracken, ed.), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp. 107–132.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bracken, B. A., 1987, Limitations of preschool instruments and standards for minimal levels of technical adequacy, J. Psychoed. Assess. 5:313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McCallum, R. S., and Karnes, F. A., 1987, Comparison of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (4th ed.), the British Ability Scales, and the WISC-R, School Psychol. Int. 8:133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Laurent, J., Swerdlik, M., and Ryburn, M., 1992, Review of validity research on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition, Psychol. Assess. 4:102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Prewett, P N., and Matavich, M. A., 1992, Mean-score differences between the WISC-R and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition, Diagnostique 17:195–201.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kaufman, A. S., and Kaufman, N. L., 1983, Interpretive Manual for the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Obringer, S. J., 1988, A survey of perceptions by school psychologists of the Stanford-Binet IV. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Louisville, KY.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Miller, T. L., and Reynolds, C. R., 1984, The K-ABC [special issue], J. Spec. Ed. 18.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kamphaus, R. W, and Kaufman, A. S., 1991, The assessment of preschool children with the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, in: The Psychoeducational Assessment of Preschool Children (ed. 2) (B. A. Bracken, ed.), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp. 154–167.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kamphaus, R. W, Kaufman, A. S., and Harrison, P. I., 1990, Clinical assessment practice with the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC), in: Handbook for Psychological and Educational Assessment of Children. Intelligence and Achievement (C. R. Reynolds and R. W. Kamphaus, eds.), Guilford Press, New York, pp. 259–276.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kamphaus, R. W, and Reynolds, C. R., 1987, Clinical and Research Applications of the K-ABC., American Guidance Services, Circle Pines, MN.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lyon, M. A., and Smith, D. K., 1986, A comparison of at-risk preschool children’s performance on the K-ABC., McCarthy scales, and Stanford-Binet, J. Psychoed. Assess. 4:35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sheslow, D., and Adams, W., 1990, Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning. Administration Manual, Jastek Associates, Wilmington, DE.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kaufman, A. S., and Kaufman, N. L., 1990, Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test Manual, American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prewet, P. N., 1992, The relationship between the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) and the WISC-R with referred students, Psychol. School 29:25–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glen P. Aylward
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Illinois University School of MedicineSpringfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations