Advertisement

Illustrated Phytoliths from Assorted Food Plants

  • Linda Scott Cummings
Part of the Advances in Archaeological and Museum Science book series (AAMS, volume 1)

Abstract

Various food plants were examined for phytoliths. Identification of cultivation or availability of food plants may rest with recovery of phytoliths from the edible or even inedible portions of the plants. Recovery of phytoliths from coprolites represents the edible portions, and may be used to identify plants that contributed to the diet. Occasionally another portion of the plant produces yet another type of phytolith, which might be recovered from plant parts that decay in place when examining sites such as garden plots.

Keywords

Hair Cell Prickly Pear Phytolith Analysis Luffa Sponge Sodium Poly Tungstate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bock, JH, Lane, MA and Norris, DO 1988 Identifying Plant Food Cells in Gastric Contents for Use in Forensic Investigations: A Laboratory Manual. Washington, DC, US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice: 130 p.Google Scholar
  2. Corkhill, NL 1949 Scorbutic diet in a Nile Cataract community. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 43: 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Culwick, GM 1951 Diet in the Gezira Irrigated Area, Sudan. Sudan Survey Department, No 304.Google Scholar
  4. Cummings, L Scott (ms) 1989 Coprolites from medieval Christian Nubia: An interpretation of diet and nutritional stress. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado: 204 p.Google Scholar
  5. Frison, E 1948 On some typical forms of silica found in plants. Microscope 7: 38–45.Google Scholar
  6. Genua, JM and Hillson, CJ 1985 The occurrence, type and location of calcium oxalate crystals in the leaves of fourteen species of Araceae. Annals of Botany 56: 351–361.Google Scholar
  7. Harrington, HD 1967 Edible Native Plants of the Rocky Mountains. Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press: 392 p.Google Scholar
  8. Hedrick, UP, ed 1972 Sturtevant’s Edible Plants of the World. New York, Dover Publications, Inc: 686 p.Google Scholar
  9. Kondo, R 1977 Opal phytoliths, inorganic, biogenic particles in plants and soils. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 11: 198–203.Google Scholar
  10. Parry, DW and Winslow, A 1977 Electron-probe microanalysis of silicon accumulation in the leaves and tendrils of Pisum sativum (L.) following root severance. Annals of Botany 41: 275–278.Google Scholar
  11. Pearsall, DM 1989 Paleoethnobotany: A Handbook of Procedures. San Diego, Academic Press: 470 p.Google Scholar
  12. Piperno, DR 1988 Phytolith Analysis: An Archaeological and Geological Perspective. San Diego, Academic Press: 280 p.Google Scholar
  13. Robbins, WW, Harrington, JP and Freire-Marreco, B 1916 Ethnobotany of the Tewa Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 55: 124 p.Google Scholar
  14. Stevenson, MC 1915 Ethnobotany of the Zuni Indians. Thirtieth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office: 31–102.Google Scholar
  15. Whiting, AF 1939 Ethnobotany of the Hopi. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 15: 120 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Scott Cummings

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations