Skip to main content

A Morphological Classification of Grass Silica-Bodies

  • Chapter
Phytolith Systematics

Part of the book series: Advances in Archaeological and Museum Science ((AAMS,volume 1))

Abstract

Classifications of grass silica-bodies are constructed for various purposes ranging from botany to archaeology. Specific organizational details vary with the experience of the phytolith analyst and the condition of the material to be classified. The first step in classification of disaggregated phytoliths, however, must be consistent identification of types based on characteristics that survive burial, ie, morphology. The defined types then need to be correlated with plant taxa at as low a level as possible.

This paper presents a standard terminology for classification of silica phytoliths, focusing on grass silica-bodies. Morphology forms the basis of the organization, although it is correlated to anatomical origin where possible. Grass silica-bodies exhibit three general geometric shapes; eight types are defined based on outline of the base. In addition, basic three-dimensional structures are defined. The classification presents standardized definitions of the “classic” grass phytolith shapes reported in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 1970 New York, American Heritage Pub Co, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bombin, M (ms) 1984 On phytoliths, Late Quaternary evolution of Beringia, and information evolutionary theory. PhD dissertation, University of Alberta: 164 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, DA 1984 Prospects and limits of a phytolith key for grasses in the central United States. Journal of Archaeological Science 11: 345–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, HT and Watson, L 1977 Identifying Grasses: Data, Methods, and Illustrations. St. Lucia, University of Queensland Press: 146 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, SM (ms) 1979 Phytoliths as indicators of plant use at ancient Troy. MS thesis, University of Minnesota: 181 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S, Rapp, G, Jr, Gifford, JA, Rondina, D and Thomson, M 1986 Phytolith analyses of samples from Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota. In Lynott, MJ, Richner, JJ, and Thompson, M, eds, Archeological Investigations at Voyageurs National Park: 1979 and 1980, Midwest Archeological Center, Occasional Studies in Anthropology No 16: 363-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, DF 1969 Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. IV. Juncales. Oxford, Clarendon Press: 357 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, RP 1976 A procedure for standardizing comparative leaf anatomy in the Poaceae. I. The leaf blade as viewed in transverse section. Bothalia 12: 65–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, RP 1979 A procedure for standardizing comparative leaf anatomy in the Poaceae. II. The epidermis as seen in surface view. Bothalia 12: 641–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esau, K 1977 Anatomy of Seed Plants. Second edition, New York, John Wiley and Sons: 550 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, CR 1960 Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. I. Gramineae. Oxford, Clarendon Press: 731 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, CR 1971 Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. V. Cyperaceae. Oxford, Clarendon Press: 597p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, SC (ms) 1985 Trapezoid grass silica cells: Distribution and morphology. Paper presented at the Second Phytolith Conference, Duluth, Minnesota. Abstract, Phytolitharien Newsletter 3(3): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1986 Classification of grass silica phytoliths. In Rovner, I, ed, Plant opal phytolith analysis in archaeology and paleoecology: Proceedings of the 1984 Phytolith Research Workshop, Raleigh, North Carolina, Occasional Papers of The Phytolitharien No 1: 41-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, SC 1989 Phytolith shape frequencies in North Dakota grasses: A comparison to general patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science 16: 489–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, SC and Rapp, G, Jr 1985 Grass silica phytoliths. Society for Archaeological Sciences Newsletter 8(2): 5–6 (Research Report 5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, SC and Rapp, G, Jr 1989 Characterization of grass phytoliths for archaeological analysis. Materials Research Society Bulletin 14(3): 36–39. Errata, MRS Bulletin 14(5): 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, SC, Rapp, G, Jr and Gifford, JA 1982 Phytoliths. In Rapp, G, Jr and Gifford, JA, eds, Troy: The Archaeological Geology, Supplementary Monograph 4. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press: 117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, SC, Rapp, G, Jr, Huber, JK, and Selness, D (ms) 1983 Results of a preliminary phytolith analysis of sediment samples from 22TS954. Unpublished report, Archaeometry Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Duluth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, PG 1976 Grass cuticles: A new paleoecological tool for East African lake sediments. Canadian Journal of Botany 54: 1725–1734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, PG and Gerbeth-Jones, S 1986 A scanning electron microscope survey of the epidermis of East African grasses: IV. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, No 62, Washington, DC, Smithsonian Institution Press: 120 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, PG and Gerbeth-Jones, S 1988 A scanning electron microscope survey of the epidermis of East African grasses: V. and West African supplement. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany No 67, Washington, DC, Smithsonian Institution Press: 157 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, PG, Gerbeth-Jones, S, and Hutchinson, S 1985 A scanning electron microscope survey of the epidermis of East African grasses: III. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, No 55, Washington, DC, Smithsonian Institution Press: 136 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, PG and Tucker, AE 1981 A scanning electron microscope survey of the epidermis of East African Grasses: I. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, No 49, Washington DC, Smithsonian Institution Press: 84 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, PG and Tucker, AE 1983 A scanning electron microscope survey of the epidermis of East African grasses: II. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, No 53, Washington DC, Smithsonian Institution Press: 72 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, DM 1978 Phytolith analysis of archaeological soils: Evidence for maize cultivation in Formative Ecuador. Science 199: 177–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, DM (ms) 1979 The application of ethnobotanical techniques to the problem of subsistence in the Ecuadorian Formative. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois: 267 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, DM 1982 Maize phytoliths: A clarification. Phytolitharien Newsletter 1(2): 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperno, DR (ms) 1983 The application of phytolith analysis to the reconstruction of plant subsistence and environments in prehistoric Panama. PhD dissertation, Temple University: 459 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperno, DR 1984 A comparison and differentiation of phytoliths from maize and wild grasses: Use of morphological criteria. American Antiquity 49:361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piperno, DR 1985 Phytolith analysis and tropical paleoecology: Production and taxonomic significance of siliceous forms in New World plant domesticates and wild species. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 45: 185–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piperno, DR 1988 Phytolith Analysis: An Archaeological and Geological Perspective. San Diego, Academic Press: 280 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, RW 1978 How to Know the Grasses. Third edition, Dubuque, Iowa, Wm C Brown Pub Co: 200 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, JM 1973 Palaeoethnobotany: The Prehistoric Food Plants of the Near East and Europe. New York, Columbia University Press: 245 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B 1963 Principles and Problems of Plane Geometry. Schaum’s Outline Series in Mathematics, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co: 231 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovner, I 1971 Potential of opal phytoliths for use in paleoecological reconstruction. Quaternary Research 1: 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suess, E (ms) 1966 Opal phytoliths. MS thesis, Kansas State University: 77 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twiss, PC, Suess, E and Smith, RM 1969 Morphological classification of grass phytoliths. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 33: 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mulholland, S.C., Rapp, G. (1992). A Morphological Classification of Grass Silica-Bodies. In: Rapp, G., Mulholland, S.C. (eds) Phytolith Systematics. Advances in Archaeological and Museum Science, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1155-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1155-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1157-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1155-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics