Advertisement

Population Estimates and Habitat Preferences of Orangutans Based on Line Transects of Nests

  • C. P. van Schaik
  • A. Priatna
  • D. Priatna

Abstract

Effective conservation of a species requires accurate information on its geographic distribution and on its densities in the range of habitats it occupies, as well as estimates of its total numbers. For the orangutan, widely divergent estimates of total numbers have been produced over the years. In this study, we used line transects of nests to estimate population densities of Sumatran orangutans. The parameters needed for this technique were obtained from large nest samples by S. Djojosudharmo and T. Mitra Setia, and from field trials. The accuracy of the method could be validated at Ketambe, a site with known density. We found that orangutan densities are highest in forests on floodplains, that they strongly decline with altitude and that this decline is most plausibly ascribed to declines in the abundance of fruits with fleshy pulp. We note that densities in one site may vary due to movements between habitats. We also present preliminary evidence that floodplain forests may act as keystone habitats for orangutans living in the adjacent hills and thus, subsidize orangutan densities in adjacent uplands.

Keywords

Line Transect Floodplain Forest Nest Density Fruit Abundance Line Transect Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brockelman, W.Y. and Ali, R., 1987, Methods of surveying and sampling forest primate populations. Pp. 23–62 in (Eds. C.W. Marsh and R. A. Mittermeier), Primate Conservation in the Tropical Rain Forest, Alan R. Liss: New York.Google Scholar
  2. Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., and Laake, J. L., 1993, Distance Sampling; Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., and Laake, J. L., 1980, Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations, Wildl. Monogr, No. 72.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, N.M., Sayer, J.A., and Whitmore, T.C., 1991, The Conservation atlas of Tropical Forests; Asia and the Pacific, London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, G. and Payne, J., 1982, A Faunal Survey of Sabah, Kuala Lumpur: IUCN/WWF Project No. 1692.Google Scholar
  6. Djojosudharmo, S. and van Schaik, C.P., 1992, Why are orang utans so rare in the highlands? Altitudinal changes in a Sumatran forest, Trop. Biodiv. 1: 11–22.Google Scholar
  7. Dobson, A.P. and Lyles, A.M., 1989, The population dynamics and conservation of primate populations, Cons. Biol. 33: 62–380.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenberg, J. F., 1979, Habitat, economy and society: some correlations and hypotheses for the Neotropical primates. Pp. 215–262 in (Eds. I. S. Bernstein and E. O. Smith), Primate Ecology and Human Origins, New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
  9. Galdikas, B.M.F. and Wood, J., 1990. Great ape and human birth intervals. Am.J. Phys. Anthropol 83:185–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghiglieri, M. P., 1984, The Chimpanzees of Kibale Forest; a Field Study of Ecology and Social Structure, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Harrison, T., in press, The paeloecological context at Niah cave, Sarawak: evidence from the primate fauna, Bull. Indo-Pac. Prehist. Assoc. Google Scholar
  12. Harrisson, B., 1962, Orang-utan, London: Collins.Google Scholar
  13. Hornaday, W. T., 1885, The Experiences of a Hunter and Naturalist in the Malay Peninsula and Borneo, New York: C. Scribner, Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Kemeny, J.G., Snell, J.L. and Thompson, G.L., 1956, Introduction to Finite Mathematics, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Krebs, C. J., 1989, Ecological Methodology, New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Leighton, M., 1993, Modeling dietary selectivity by Bornean orangutans: evidence for integration of multiple criteria in fruit selection. Int. J. Primatol., 14, 257–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lonsdale, M.W., 1988, Predicting the amount of litterfall inn forests of the world, Ann. Bot. 61: 319–324.Google Scholar
  18. MacKinnon, K., 1987, Conservation status of primates in Malasia with special reference to Indonesia. Prim. Cons. 6: 175–183.Google Scholar
  19. MacKinnon, J., 1992, Species survival plan for the orangutan. Pp. 209–219 in: (Eds. G. Ismail, M. Mohamed, and S. Omar), Proceedings of the International Conference on Forest Biology and Conservation in Borneo, Kota Kinabalu: Yayasan Sabah. (Eds. Martin, P.S., and Klein, R.G.), 1984, Quaternary Extinctions: a Prehistoric Revolution, Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  20. Payne, J., 1987, Surveying orang-utan populations by counting nests from a helicopter: a pilot survey in Sabah, Prim. Conserv. 8: 92–103.Google Scholar
  21. Repetto, R., 1990, Deforestation in the tropics, Sci. Am. 262(4): 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rijksen, H.D., 1978, A Field Study of Sumatran Orang Utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii Lesson 1827), Wageningen: H. Veenman and Zonen B.V.Google Scholar
  23. Rijksen, H.D., 1982, How to save the mysterious ‘man of the rain forest’?, Pp. 317–341 in (Ed. L.E.M. de Boer), The Orang Utan. Its Biology and Conservation, The Hague: Dr W. Junk Publ.Google Scholar
  24. Schaller, G. B., 1961, The orang-utan in Sarawak, Zoologica 46: 73–82.Google Scholar
  25. Schmidt-Nielsen, K., 1975, Animal Physiology, Adaptation and Environment, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sugardjito, J., 1983, Selecting nest sites by Sumatran orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Indonesia, Primates 24: 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sugardjito, J., 1986, Ecological constraints on the behaviour of Sumatran orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Indonesia, Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  28. te Boekhorst, I.T.A., Schürmann, C.L., and Sugardjito, J., 1990, Residential status and seasonal movements of wild orang-utans in the Gunung Leuser Reserve (Sumatra, Indonesia), Anim. Behav. 39: 1098–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tutin, C.E.G., and Fernandez, M., 1984, Nationwide census of gorilla (Gorilla g. gorilla) and chimpanzee (Pan t. troglodytes) populations in Gabon. Am. J. Primatol. 6: 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Beek, C. G. G., 1982, Een geomorfologische bodemkundige Studie van het Gunung Leuser nationale park, noord Sumatra, Indonésie. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  31. van Schaik, C.P., 1986, Phenological changes in a Sumatran rain forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 2: 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van Schaik, C.P. and Azwar, 1991, Orangutan densities in different forest types in the Gunung Leuser National Park (Sumatra), as determined by nest counts, Report to PHPA, LIPI and L.S.B. Leakey Foundation, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  33. van Schaik, C.P. and Mirmanto, E., 1985, Spatial variation in the structure and litterfall of a Sumatran rain forest, Biotropica 17: 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Strien, N.J., 1985, The Sumatran rhinoceros-Dicerorhinus sumatrensis (Fisher, 1814)-in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Sumatra, Indonesia; its distribution, ecology and conservation, Ph.D thesis, Wageningen (NL).Google Scholar
  35. von Koenigswald, R., 1982, Distribution and evolution of the orang utan, Pongo pygmaeus (Hoppius). Pp. 1–15, in (Ed. L.E.M. de Boer), The Orang Utan, Its Biology and Conservation, The Hague: Dr W. Junk Publ.Google Scholar
  36. Wallace, A. R., 1869, The Malay Archipelago; the Land of the Orang-utan and the Bird of Paradise, London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
  37. Whitesides, G.H., Oates, J.F., Green, S.M., and Kluberdanz, R.P., 1988, Estimating primate densities from transects in a West African rain forest: a comparison of techniques, J. Anim. Ecol. 57: 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. P. van Schaik
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Priatna
    • 3
    • 4
  • D. Priatna
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy and Center for Tropical ConservationDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.New York Zoological Society - The Wildlife Conservation SocietyUSA
  3. 3.Universitas NasionalPasar Minggu, Jakarta SelatanIndonesia
  4. 4.Biological Sciences ClubPasar Minggu, Jakarta SelatanIndonesia

Personalised recommendations