Electrooptic Tunable Filters for WDM Networks

  • O. Eknoyan
  • H. F. Taylor


An attractive component for wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) in fiber optic networks is a four-port, tunable channel-dropping filter [1]. Such components are important to increase the bit rate for high capacity optical networks by better utilization of the fiber bandwidth, and also in switching functions for efficient signal routing. Polarization independence is a key requirement, and high speed (<1 μs) tuning is needed for packet-switching. Tunable wavelength filters have been produced in a number of materials using acoustooptic and electrooptic tuning schemes as well as movable gratings [2], [3]. This paper discusses the development of electrooptically tunable filters in ferroelectric LiTaO3 crystals. These filters make use of the static strain-optic (SSO) effect for phase matched polarization coupling in diffused channel waveguides. The use of the SSO effect in producing low-loss channel waveguides in LiNbO3 and LiTaO3 substrates, as well as in tungsten bronze Sr0.6Ba0.4Nb2O6 (SBN:60) and BSTN crystals [4] is also presented. The tungsten bronzes are attractive materials for making channel-dropping filters due to their larger r33 electrooptic coefficients [5], which could make it possible to increase the number of accessible wavelength channels and reduce electrooptic tuning voltages.


Wavelength Division Multiplex Si02 Film Channel Waveguide Tungsten Bronze Lithium Tantalate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    P.E. Green, Jr., Fiber Optic Networks, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    C.A. Brackett, “Dense wavelength division multiplexing networks: Principles and applications,” IEEE J. Select. Areas of Commun., vol. 8, pp. 948–964, 1990.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    K. Hirabayashi, H. Tsuda, and T. Kurokawa, “Tunable liquid crystal Fabry-Perot interferometric filter for wavelength-division multiplexing communication systems,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 11, pp. 2033–2043, 1993.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Tungsten bronze crystals supplied by Dr. R.R. Neurgaonkar, Rockwell International Science Center.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R.R. Neurgaonkar, W.F. Hall, J.R. Oliver, W.W. Ho, and W.K. Cory, “ Tungsten bronze Sri..xBaxNb2O6: A case history of versatility,” Ferroelectrics, vol. 87, pp. 167–179, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    I.P. Kaminow, and J.R. Carruthers, “Optical waveguiding layers in LiNbO3 and LiTaO3,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 22, pp. 326–328, 1973.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R.W. Schmidt and I.P. Kaminow, “Metal diffused optical waveguide in LiNbO3,” AppL Phys. Leet., vol. 25, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.L. Jackel, “ High-An optical waveguides in LiNbO3: Thallium-lithium ion exchange,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 37, pp. 739–741, 1980.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    O. Eknoyan, H.F. Taylor, Z. Tang, V.P. Swenson, and J.M. Marx, “ Strain induced optical waveguides in lithium niobate, lithium tantalate, and barium titanate,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 60, pp. 407–409, 1992.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D.A. Pinnow, “Elastooptical materials,” in Handbook of Lasers, edited by R.J. Presley, Cleveland, OH: CRC, 1971.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J.M. Marx, O. Eknoyan, H.F. Taylor, and R.R. Neurgaonkar, “Low loss optical waveguides in strontium barium niobate (SBN:60) at wavelength,” submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    K. Yamanouchi, K. Wakazono, and K. Shibayama, “Optical surface wave mode converters and modulators utilizing static strain optic effects,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., vol. QE-16, pp. 628–634, 1980.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Z. Tang, O. Eknoyan, H.F. Taylor and V.P. Swenson, “Tunable guided-wave optical polarization converter in lithium tantalate,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 62, pp. 1059–1061, 1993.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Z. Tang, O. Eknoyan, H.F. Taylor, and V.P. Swenson, “Electro-optically tunable wavelength selective polarisation convertor in LiTaO3,” Electron. Lett., vol. 28, pp. 2248–2249, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    W. Warrzanskyj, F. Heismann, and R.C. Alferness, “Polarization-independent electroopticall tunable narrow band wavelength filter,” AppL Phys. Lett., vol. 53, pp. 13–15, 1988.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Z. Tang, O. Eknoyan, and H.F. Taylor “Polarization-independent electrooptically tunable wavelength filter in LiTaO3,” to be published in Electron. Lett. Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    R.C. Alferness and P.S. Cross, “Filter characteristics of codirectionally coupled waveguide with weighted coupling,” IEEE. J. Quantum Electron., vol. QE-14, pp. 843–847, 1978.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. Kar-Roy and C.S. Tsai, “Ultralow sidelobe-level integrated acoustooptic tunable filters using tapered-gap surface acousic wave directional couplers,” J. Lightwave TechnoL, vol. 12, pp. 977–982, 1994.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Eknoyan
    • 1
  • H. F. Taylor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations