Abstract
The hypothesis that a neuronal network interposed between the output elements of the optic tectum, and hypoglossal and other cranial motoneurons subserves ballistic snapping in anurans is critically examined. Morphological and electrophysiological data have not revealed a direct monosynaptic connection between the optic tectum and hypoglossal motoneurons. On the contrary, the available evidence supports the presence of interneurons mediating impulse traffic from the tectum to cranial motoneurons. It is argued that these interneurons are part of a motor pattern generator (MPG). The afferent connections of the bulbar reticular formation (RetF) and the hypoglossal nucleus were studied using the horseradish peroxidase method. The results substantiate the hypothesis that a vital component of the neural substrate for snapping generation is located in the medial RetF (MRF), has access to the motoneurons relevant for snapping, and receives inputs from the tectum and the torus semicircularis. Bilateral tectal and toral inputs to MRF suggest that the MPG consists of two unilateral subunits each having independent access to the relevant motoneurons. This is consistent with the observations that toads with unilateral tectal, or medullary lesions are still capable of snapping. Connections between the nucleus of the solitary tract and the hypoglossal nucleus may be important for elementary bulbar reflexes and manipulation of prey within the mouth. Interconnections between hypoglossal nucleus and other craniomotor nuclei might play a role in the coordination of tongue and jaw musculature necessary for precise timing of the ballistic snapping movement. From a review of the available evidence, a more detailed scheme of the MPG is proposed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arbib MA (1988) Levels of modelling of mechanisms of visually guided behavior. Behaw Brain Sci 10 (in press)
Bieger D, Neuman RS (1984) Selective accumulation of hydroxytroptamines by frog tectal neurons. Neurosci 12: 1167–1177
Bloom FE (1979) Chemical integrative processes in the central nervous system. In: Schmidt FO, Worden FG (eds) The neurosciences: fourth study program. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Braak H (1970) Biogene Amine im Gehirn vom Frosch (Rana esculenta). Z Zellforsch 106: 269–308
Brenowitz GL, Collins WF Jr, Erulkar SD (1983) Dye and electrical coupling between frog motoneurons. Brain Res 274: 371–375
Brookhart JM, Fadiga E (1960) Potential fields initiated during monosynaptic activation of frog motoneurones. JPhysiol (Lond)150: 633–655
Burghagen H (1979) Der Einfluß von figuralen visuellen Mustern auf das Beutefangverhalten verschiedenerAnuren. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ Kassel
Cajal SR y (1909) Histologie du Systeme nerveux de f homme et des vertebres Maloine, Paris
Cardona A, Rudomin P (1983) Activation of brain stem serotonergic pathways decreases homosynaptic depression of monosynaptic responses of frog spinal motoneurons. Brain Res 280: 373–378
Comer C, Grobstein P (1981a) Tactually elicited prey acquisition behavior in the frog, Rana pipiens, and a comparison with visually elicited behavior. J Comp Physiol 142: 141–150
Comer C, Grobstein P (1981b) Involvement of midbrain structure in tactually and visually elicited prey acquisition behavior in the frog, Rana pipiens J Comp Physio1142: 151–160
DeOlmos J, Heimer L (1977) Mapping of collateral projections with the HRP method. Neurosci Lett 6: 107–114
Dole JW, Rose BB, Tachiki KH (1981) Western toads (Bufo boreas) learn odor of prey insects. Herpetologica 37: 63–68
Doty RW, Richmond WH, Storey AT (1967) Effect of medulla lesions on coordination of deglutition. Pxp Neuro 17: 91–106
Ebbesson SOE, Hansel M, Scheich H (1981) An ‘on the slide’ modification of the DeOlmos-Heimer HRP method. NeurasciLett22: 1–4
Eikmanns K-H (1955) Verhaltensphysiologische Untersuchungen fiber den Beutefang and das Bewegungssehen der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo L). Z Tierpsychol 12: 229–253
Ewert J-P (1967) Aktivierung der Verhaltensfolge beim Beutefang der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo L) durch elektrische Mittelhirnreizung. Z Vergl Physiol54: 455–481
Ewert J-P (1968) Der Einfluß von Zwischenhirndefekten auf die Visuomotorik im Beute-and Fluchtverhalten der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo). Z Vergi Physiol 61: 41–70
Ewert J-P (1984) Tectal mechanisms that underlie prey-catching and avoidance behaviors in toads. In:
Vanegas H (ed) Comparative neurology of the optic tectum Plenum Press, New York, pp 247–416
Ewert J-P (1987) Neuroethology of releasing mechanisms: prey-catching in toads. Behav Brain Sci 10: 337–405
Ewert J-P, Schfirg-Pfeiffer E, Weerasuriya A (1984a) Neurophysiological data regarding motor pattern generation in the medulla oblongata of toads. Naturwissenschaften 71: 590–591
Ewert J-P, Finkenstädt T, Weerasuriya A (1984b) Concepts for neuronal correlates of Gestalt perception: visual prey recognition in toads. In: Aoki K, Ishii S, Morita H (eds) Animal behavior, neurophysiological and ethological approaches. Japan Scientific Soc Press, Tokyo, pp 137–159
Feldman JL (1986) Neurophysiology of respiration in mammals. In: Bloom FE (ed) Handbook of physiology. The nervous system. Intrinsic regulatory systems of the brain. American Physiological Society, Bethesda pp 463–524
Finkenstädt T, Adler NT, Allen TO, Ebbesson SOE, Ewert J-P (1985) Mapping of brain activity in mesencephalic and diencephalic structures of toads during presentation of visual key stimuli: a computer assisted analysis of 14C–2DG autoradiographs. J Comp Physiol156: 433–445
Fuchs AF, Kaneko CRS (1985) A brain stem generator for saccadic eye movements. In: Evarts EV, Wise SP, Bousfield D (eds) The motor system in neurobiology. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam New York Oxford, pp 126–132
Gans C (1961) The bullfrog and its prey. Nat Hist70: 26–37
Gans C, Gorniak GC (1982a) Functional morphology of lingual protrusion in marine toads (Bufo manrnus). Amer JAnat 163: 195–222
Gans C, Gorniak GC (1982b) How does the toad flip its tongue? Test of two hypotheses. Science 216: 13351337
Gaupp E (1899) A Lckei’s and R Wiedersheim’s Anatomic des Frosches. Vieweg and Sohn, Braunschweig
Gladen S (1984) Der Einfluß derApomorphindosis auf das Beutefangverhalten and auf die reizspezifische Gewöhnung bei Erdkröten. Staatsexam Thesis, Univ Kassel
Grillner S (1981) Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish. In: Brooks VB (ed) Handbook of physiology. The nervous system. Motor control. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 11791236
Grobstein P, Comer C, Kostyk SK (1983) Frog prey capture: between sensory maps and directed motor output. In: Ewert J-P, Capranica RR, Ingle DJ (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 331–347
Hinsche G (1935) Ein Schnappreflex nach “Nichts” bei Anuren. Zool Anz 111: 113–122
Hobson JA, Scheibel AB (eds) (1980) The brain stem core: senson’motorintegration and behavioral state control. Neuroscience research program bulletin Vol 18. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Ingle DJ (1983) Brain mechanisms of visual localization by frogs and toads. In: Ewert J-P, Capranica RR
Ingle DJ (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology Plenum Press, New York, pp 177–226
Ito M (1986) Neural systems controlling movement. T7NS9: 515–518
Jean A (1984) Brainstem organization of the swallowing network. Brain Behav Evol25: 109–116
Kaneko CRS, Ewinger C, Fuchs AF (1981) Role of cat pontine burst neurons in generating of saccadic eye movements. JNeurophysiol46: 387–408
Kicliter E (1973) Flux wavelength and movement discrimination in frogs: forebrain and midbrain contributions. Brain Behav Evo! 8: 340–365
Kostyk SK, Grobstein P (1987) Neuronal organization underlying visually elicited prey orienting in the frog. II: Anatomical studies on the laterality of central projections. Neurosci 21: 57–82
Kramer EB, Rath T, Lischka MF (1979) Somatotopic organization of the hypoglossal nucleus: HRP study in the rat. Brain Res 170: 533–537
Kupfermann I, Weiss KR (1978) The command neuron concept. Behav Brain Sci 1: 3–39
Landgren S, Olsson KA, Westberg KG (1986) Bulbar neurones with axonal projections to the trigeminal motor nucleus in the cat. Erp Brain Res 65: 98–111
Lázár G (1969) Efferent pathways of the optic tectum in the frog. Acta Biol Acad Sci Hung20: 171–183
Lázár G, Toth P, Csank G, Kicliter E (1983) Morphology and location of tectal projection neurons in frogs: a study with HRP and cobalt-filling. J Comp Neuro 215: 108–120
Maeda M. Magherini PC, Precht W (1977) Functional organization of vestibular and visual inputs to neck and forelimb motoneurons in the frog. J Neurophysiol 40: 225–243
Matesz C, Székely G (1977) The dorsomedial nuclear group of cranial nerves in the frog. Acta Biol Acad Sci Hung28: 461–474
Matsushima T, Satou M, Ueda K (1986) Glossopharyngeal and tectal influences on tongue muscle motoneurons in the Japanese toad. Brain Res 265: 198–203
Nieuwenhuys R, Opdam P (1976) Structure of the brain stem. In: Llinds R, Precht W (eds) Frog neurobiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 811–855
Northcutt RG, Kicliter E (1980) Organization of the amphibian telencephalon. In: Ebbesson SOE (ed) Comparative neurology of the telencephalon. Plenum Press, New York, pp 203–255
Nozaki S, Enomoto S, Nakamura Y (1983) Identification and input-output properties of bulbar reticular neurons involved in the cerebral cortical control of trigeminal motoneurons in the cat. Exp Brain Res 49: 363–372
Olsson KA, Landgren S, Westberg KG (1986) Location of and peripheral convergence on the interneurone in the disynaptic path from the coronal gyros of the cerebral cortex to the trigeminal motoneurones in the cat. Erp Brain Res 65: 83–97
Opdam P, Kemali M, Nieuwenhuys R (1976) Topological analysis of the brain stem of the frogs Rana esculenta and Rana catesbeiana. J Comp Neurol165: 307–331
Parent A (1973) Distribution of monamine-containing neurons in the brain stem of the frog, Rana temporaria. JMorph 139: 67–78
Porter R (1965) Synaptic potentials in hypoglossal motoneurones. JPhysiol (London)180: 209–244
Quick I (1984) Auswirkungen von Apomurphin auf die visuelle Mustereliskiiminationstâhigkeit and die Beutefangmotivation bei Erdkröten. Staatsexam Thesis, Univ Kassel
Robinson DA (1981) Control of eye movements. In: Books VB (ed) Handbook of Physiology. The nervous systems. Motor control. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 1275–1320
Rubinson K (1968) Projections of the tectum opticum of the frog. Brain Behav Evol1: 529–561
Satou M, Ewert J-P (1985) The antidromic activation of tectal neurons by electrical stimuli applied to the caudal medulla oblongata in the toad Bufo bufo (L). J Comp Physiol 157: 739–748
Satou M, Matsushima T, Takeuchi H, Ueda K (1985) Tongue-muscle controlling motoneurons in the Japanes toad: topography, morphology, and neuronal pathways from the ‘snapping evoking area’ in the optic tectum. J Comp Physio1157: 717–737
Schmidt RS (1976) Neural correlates of frog calling. Isolated brainstem. J Comp Physiol 108: 99–114
Schmidt RS (1984) Neural correlates of frog calling: preoptic area trigger of ‘mating calling’. J Comp Physiol 154: 847–853
Schneider D (1954) Das Gesichtsfeld and der Fixiervorgang bei einheimischen Anuren. Z Vergl Physiol36: 147–164
Shinn EA, Dole JW (1978) Evidence for a role for olfactory cues in the feeding response of leopard frogs, Rana pipiens. Herpetologica 34: 167–172
Sailer RW (1977) Monoaminergic inputs to frog motoneurons: an anatomical study using fluorescence histochemical and silver degeneration techniques. Brain Res 122: 445–458
Stuesse SL, Cruce WLR, Powell KS (1983) Afferent and efferent components of the hypoglossal nerve in the grass frog. J Comp Neural 217: 432–439
Sumi T (1969) Synaptic potentials of hypoglossal motoneurons and their relation to reflex deglutition. Jap J Physiol 19: 68–79
Székely G, L izâr G (1976) Cellular and synaptic architecture of the optic tectum. In: Llinâs R, Precht W (eds) Frog neurobiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 407–434
Székely G, Levai G, Matesz K (1983) Primary afferent terminals in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the frog: an electron microsopic study. Exp Brain Res 53: 109–117
Uemura-Sumi M, Mizuno N, Iwahori N, Tackeuchi Y, Matsushima R (1981) Topographical representation of the hypoglossal nerve branches and tongue muscles in the hypoglossal nucleus of macaque monkeys. Neurosci Lett 22: 31–35
Weerasuriya A (1983) Snapping in toads: some aspects of sensorimotor interfacing and motor pattern generation. In: Ewert J-P, Capranica RR, Ingle DJ (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 613–627
Weerasuriya A (1988) Effect of medullary lesions and hypoglossal nerve transections on snapping in toads (in preparation)
Weerasuriya A, Ewert J-P (1981) Prey-selective neurons in the toads optic tectum and sensori-motor interfacing: HRP studies and recording experiments. J Comp Physiol 144: 429–434
Weerasuriya A, Ewert J-P (1984) Afferents of the hypoglossal nucleus in the common European toad, Bufo bufa Amer Ass Anat Abstr1984: 192A
Weerasuriya A, Ewert J-P (1988) Afferents of the hypoglossal nucleus in the toad, Bufo bufo (submitted)
Westerfield M, Frank E (1982) Specificity of electrical coupling among neurons innervating forelimb muscles of the adult bullfrog. JNeurophysiol48: 904–913
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weerasuriya, A. (1989). In Search of the Motor Pattern Generator for Snapping in Toads. In: Ewert, JP., Arbib, M.A. (eds) Visuomotor Coordination. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0897-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0897-1_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0899-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0897-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive