In the last few years, several new techniques became suitable for the treatment of ureteral stones, increasing the methods already available. The indications for each treatment are based on a number of parameters: size and hardness of the stone; position of the stone in the ureter; presence of dilation or a non-functioning kidney; duration of stone in position. In order to assess which treatment is most appropriate for each stone, we reviewed our experience from January, 1985 until March, 1988.
- 1.A Mandressi, G Zanetti, M Ruoppolo, P Tombolimi, G Dormia, G Donizzetti, and E Pisani, Ureteral stone management: our experience, Arch. It. Urol. 60:29 (1988).Google Scholar
- 2.K Miller and R Hautmann, ESWL of distal ureteral calculi. A new approach, in: “IVth World Congr. Endourology and ESWL”, Madrid (1986), Abstr. 199.Google Scholar
- 3.E Pisani, P Tombolini, A Mandressi, M Ruoppolo, G Zanetti, A Trinchieri, G Dormia, A Cazzaniga, and G Longo, La litotrissia elettroidraulica (EHL) nel trattamento della calcolosi ureterale, Acta Urol. Ital. 0:107 (1986).Google Scholar
- 4.G Zanetti, M Ruoppolo, and E Pisani, Trattamento ESWL: due anni di esperienza, Arch. It. Urol. LX:285 (1988).Google Scholar