Signal Detection and Perceived Risks: Homeowner Responses to Radon Risk Information

  • F. Reed Johnson
Part of the Advances in Risk Analysis book series (AIRA, volume 6)


Policies for reducing such risks as natural hazards, AIDS, household use of pesticides, and indoor air pollution often rely on dissemination of risk information to promote risk-reducing behavior. Economists often use state-dependent utility constructs to model this kind of problem. While this approach assumes a high degree of competence on the part of the decision maker, psychological evidence indicates that people frequently use simple rules when faced with complex decisions. This study employs Heiner’s model of rule-governed behavior to analyze radon mitigation. Application of the reliability model is illustrated with observed mitigation responses of a sample of Maine homeowners. Data now being collected from a sample of New York homeowners will provide a basis for testing formal hypotheses arising from the model.


Radon perceived risk risk information reliability model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Einhorn, Hillel J., and Hogarth, Robin M., 1985, Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference, Psychological Review 92(4):433–461 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Heiner, Ronald A., 1983, The Origin of Predictable Behavior, American Economic Review 73(4):560–95 (September).Google Scholar
  3. Heiner, Ronald A., 1984, On Reinterpreting the Foundations of Risk and Utility Theory, Unpublished paper, Economics Department, Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
  4. Heiner, Ronald A., 1986, Uncertainty, Signal-Detection Experiments, and Modeling Behavior, in Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics, Richard N. Langlois, ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Heiner, Ronald A., 1985, Rational Expectations When Agents Imperfectly Use Information, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 8 (2): 201–207.Google Scholar
  6. Heiner, Ronald A., The Necessity of Delaying Adjustment of Imperfect Decisions and Expectations, American Economic Review (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Heiner, Ronald A., The Necessity of Imperfectly Using Information, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (in press).Google Scholar
  8. Kaen, Fred R., and Rosenman, Robert E., 1986, Predictable Behavior in Financial Markets: Some Evidence in Support of Heiner’s Hypothesis, American Economic Review 76(1):212–220 (March).Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, F. Reed, and Luken, Ralph A., 1987, Radon Risk Information and Voluntary Protection: Evidence from a Natural Experiment, Risk Analysis 7 (1): 97–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos, 1979, Prospect Theory: An analysis of Decision Under Risk, Econometrica 47: 263–91 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schoemaker, J H., 1982, The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence, and Limitations, Journal of Economic Literature X X: 529–563 (June).Google Scholar
  12. Slovic, P., B. Fischoff, and S. Lichtenstein, 1985, Regulation of Risk: A Psychological Perspective, in Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, Roger Noll, ed., University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  13. Thaler, Richard, 1980, Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel, 1977, Causal Schema in Judgments Under Uncertainty, in Progress in Social Psychology, M. Fishbein, ed., Erlbaum, NJ.Google Scholar
  15. U.S. General Accounting Office, 1986, Air Pollution: Hazards of Indoor Radon Could Pose a National Health Problem, GAO/RCED-86–170, Washington, D.C. (June).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Reed Johnson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S. Naval AcademyAnnapolisUSA
  2. 2.Economic Analysis BranchU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyUSA

Personalised recommendations