Advertisement

Carcinogenicity Versus Acute Toxicity: Is There a Relationship?

  • Bernhard Metzger
  • Edmund Crouch
  • Richard Wilson
Part of the Advances in Risk Analysis book series (AIRA, volume 6)

Abstract

Carcinogenic potency is compared in rodents with acute toxicity for a group of chemicals (155) which were tested independently of and mostly before the NCl/NTP program. For the entire data set and several subsets, we find partially biased statistically significant linear relationships between potency and the inverse of LD50. On average, the chemicals studied outside the NCl/NTP program are more carcinogenic compared to their acute toxicity than the NCl/NTP chemicals. Analysis shows a clear unbiased upper bound for carcinogenic potency. The correlation between potency and acute toxicity is robust with respect to species and route of administration. We find good agreement between oral and inhalation experiments, for toxicities and carcinogenicities.

Keywords

Carcinogenicity toxicity correlation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstein, L., Gold, L. S., Ames, B. N., Pike, M. C., and Hoel, D. G., 1985, Some Tautologous Aspects of the Comparison of Carcinogenic Potency in Rats and Mice, Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 5: 79 - 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gold, L. S., Sawyer, C. B., Magaw, R., Backman, G. M., de Vecina, M., Levinson, R., Hooper, N. K., Havender, W. R., Bernstein, L., Peto, R., Pike, M. C., and Ames, B. N., 1984, A Carcinogenic Potency Database of the Standardized Results of Animal Bioas says, Env. Health Perspectives 58: 9 - 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. NIOSH, 1984, Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances,U.S.Google Scholar
  4. DHHS, 1983 Supplement to the 1981-82 edition, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  5. NIOSH, 1980, Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances,U.S.Google Scholar
  6. DHHS, 1979 edition, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  7. Parodi, S., Taningher, M., Baero, P., and Santi, L., 1982, Quantitative Correlations Amongst Alkaline DNA Fragmentation, DNA Covalent Binding, Mutagenicity in the Ames Test, and Carcinogenicity for 21 Compounds, Mutation Res. 93: 1 - 24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tancrède, M., Wilson, R., Zeise, L., and Crouch, E. A. C., 1986, The Carcinogenic Risk of Organic Vapors Indoors: A Survey, Energy and Environmental Policy Center, E-86-06, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Zeise, L., 1984, Surrogate Measures of Human Cancer Risk, Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Zeise, L., Crouch, E. A. C., and Wilson, R., 1984, Use of Acute Toxicity to Estimate Carcinogenic Risk, Risk Analysis 4: 187 - 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zeise, L., and Crouch, E. A. C., 1986, A Possible Relationship Between Toxicity and Carcinogenicity, J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 5 (2): 137 - 151.Google Scholar
  12. Zeise, L., and Crouch, E. A. C., 1985, Reply to Comments: On the Relationship of Toxicity and Carcinogenicity, Letter to the Editor, Risk Analysis 5 (4): 265 - 270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernhard Metzger
    • 2
  • Edmund Crouch
    • 1
  • Richard Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Acorn ParkArthur D. Little, Inc.CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations