Abstract
The concept of an attitude towards risk that is unique to the individual is used in predicting and prescribing preferred responses to risk. Because it is expensive and time consuming to measure attitude towards risk, one measurement or estimate of an individual’s risk attitude is often used to predict or prescribe actions in different decision contexts. However, empirical evidence shows that one of the most commonly used measures of risk attitude, the Arrow-Pratt coefficient of absolute risk aversion, varies over time, income levels and decision contexts. It can be shown that for the Arrow-Pratt coefficient to be a reliable indicator of risk attitude, individuals must exhibit (1) constant marginal utility for money, (2) homogeneous preferences, and (3) coherence of preference orderings over certainty and uncertainty. Experimental data indicate consistent violation of these conditions. As a result, the Arrow-Pratt coefficient confounds risk attitude and strength of preference for particular goods. A new measure of intrinsic risk attitude that removes the confounding influence of strength of preference for particular goods is developed and its use demonstrated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
K. Arrow, Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing, Helsinki, Yrjo Jahhssonin Saatio (1965).
J. Pratt, Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large, Econometrica 32:122–136 (1964).
J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, The Theory of Games, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1944).
D. Bell and H. Raiffa, Marginal Value and Intrinsic Risk Aversion, Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 79-65 (1979).
J. Dyer and R. Sarin, Relative Risk Aversion, Management Science 28:875–886 (1982).
B. Fleisher, A New Measure of Attitude Towards Risk, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Michigan State University Department of Agricultural Economics (1985).
A. Tversky, Additive Utility and Subjective Probability, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4:175–201 (1967).
G. Fischer, Multidimensional Utility Models for Risky and Riskless Choice, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 17:127–146 (1976).
R. Keeney, Multiplicative Utility Functions, Operations Research 22:22–34 (1974).
R. Krzysztofowicz, Strength of Preference and Risk Attitude in Utility Measurement, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31:88–113 (1983).
P. Fishburn and R. Keeney, Seven Independence Concepts and Continuous Multiattribute Utility Functions, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 11:294–327 (1974).
P. Fishburn and R. Keeney, Generalized Utility Independence and Some Implications, Operations Research 23:928–940 (1975).
D. Krantz, H. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky, Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York (1971).
R. Roskies, A Measurement Axiomatization for an Essentially Multiplicative Representation of Two Factors, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2:266–267 (1965).
R. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1976).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fleisher, B. (1991). Development of Robust Measures of Attitude Towards Risk. In: Zervos, C., Knox, K., Abramson, L., Coppock, R. (eds) Risk Analysis. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0730-1_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0730-1_43
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0732-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0730-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive