Advertisement

Ultraviolet Radiation and the Eye

  • David H. Sliney
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 242)

Abstract

A number of in-vitro laboratory studies have shown that ultraviolet radiation (UVR) can produce optical changes in lens proteins that could explain at least one causal factor in some forms of cataractogenesis [1–7]. Cataracts have also been produced in rabbits from acute exposure to UVR in the 295–320 nanometer (nm) UV spectral band [8–10]. Additionally, several epidemiological and related studies have suggested a relationship between outdoor ambient UVR levels and the incidence of corneal degeneration and senile cataract [11–22]. Weale estimated that a factor of ten in the incidence rate of cataract was due to sunlight [23]. In addition to these delayed effects, one can experience the painful symptoms of snowblindness or welder’s flash (photokeratoconjuctivitis, or simply photokeratitis) from acute UV exposures.

Keywords

Ultraviolet Radiation Lens Protein Occupational Exposure Limit Threshold Limit Value Senile Cataract 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pirie A: Photo-oxidation of proteins and comparison of photo-oxidized proteins with those of cataractous human lenses. Isr Med Sci 8:1567–1573, 1972.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lerman S: Human ultraviolet radiation cataracts. Ophthalmic Res 12:303–314, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zigman S, Schultz J, Yulo T, and Griess G: The binding of photo-oxidized tryptophan to a lens gamma-crystal lin. Exp Eye Res 17:209–215, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borkman R and Lerman S: Evidence for a free-radical mechanism in aging and UV irradiated ocular lenses. Exp. Eye Res 25:303–309, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kurzel RB, Wolbarsht ML, and Yamanashi BS: Ultraviolet radiation effects on the human eye. In: Photochemical and Photobiological Reviews, vol 2, Smith KC. editor, New York, Plenum Press, 1977, pp 133–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dillon J, Garner MH, Roy D, and Spector A: The photolysis of lens proteins: Molecular changes. Exp Eye Res 34:651–658, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yamanashi BS, Gacker H, and Klintworth GK: Wavelength dependence and kinetics of UV-induced free radical formation in the human cornea and lens. Photochem Photobiol 30(3):391–395, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bachern A: Ophthalmic ultraviolet action spectra. Am J Ophthaimol 41:969–975, 1956.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pitts DG, Cullen AP, and Hacker PD: Ocular effects of ultraviolet radiation from 295 to 365 nm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 16(10):932–939, 1977.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cullen AP: Additive effects of ultraviolet radiation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 57(11):808–814, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roger FC, Cuthill JA, Fyvelor PJ, and Lenham AP: Ultraviolet radiation as a possible cause of corneal degenerative changes under certain physiographic conditions. Acta Ophthalmologica 52:777–785, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taylor HC: The environment and the lens. Brit J Ophthalmol 64:303–310, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Heyningen R: The human lens. I. A comparison of cataracts extracted in Oxford (England) and Shikarpur (W Pakistan). Exp Eye Res 13:136–147, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hiller R, Giacometti L, Yuen K: Sunlight and Cataract: An epidemiological investigation. Am J Epidemiol 105:450–459, 1977.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wright RE: The possible influence of solar radiation on the production of cataract in certain districts of southern India: a preliminary investigation: Indian J Med Res 24:917–930, 1936.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Young JDH and Finley RD: Primary spheroidal degeneration of the cornea in Labrador and Northern Newfoundland. Am J. Ophthalmol 71(1):129–134, 1973.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hollows F and Moran D: Cataract—the ultraviolet risk factor. Lancet 2:1249–1250, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldsmith R, Rothhammer F, and Schull W: The multinational Andean genetic and health program. III. Ophthalmic disease and disability among the Aymara. Bull Pan Amer Health Organiz 13:58–65, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vines AP: An epidemiological sample survey of the highlands, mainland and island regions of the territory of Papua and New Guinea. Port Moresby, New Guinea, Government Printer, 1967.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seung WS: A survey of senile cataracts among high altitude living Tibetans in Chang-du district, Tibet. Chinese J Ophthalmol 15:100–104, 1979.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brilliant LB, Grasset NC, Pokhrel RS, Kolstad A, Lepkowski JM, Brilliant GE, Hawks WN, and Pararajasegaram R: Associations among cataract prevalence, sunlight hours, and altitude in the Himalayas. Am J Epidemiol 118(2):250–264, 1983.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zigman S, Datiles M, and Torcyznski E: Sunlight and human cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:462–467, 1979.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weale R: Senile cataract, the case against light. Ophthalmology 90:420–423, 1983.; see also: Brit J Ophthalmol 66(l):31-34, 1982.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sliney, DH and Wolbarsht ML: Safety with Lasers and Other Optical Sources, New York, Plenum Publishing Corp., 1980, pp. 101–245.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Henderson: Daylight and Its Spectrum. Elsevier, New York check.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Garrison LM, Murray LE, Doda DD, and Green, AES: Diffuse—direct ultraviolet ratios with a compact double monochromator. Appl Opt. 17(5):827–835, 1978.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sliney, DH: Eye protective techniques for bright light. Ophthalmology 90(8):937–944, 1983.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sliney DH (1986) Physical factors in cataractogenesis: Ambient ultraviolet radiation and temperature, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27(5): 781–790.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values. 4th Edn. pp. 451-455, Cincinnati, ACGIH, 1980.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    ACGIH (1987) TLV’s, Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices for 1987–1988, American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sliney DH (1987) Unintentional exposure to ultraviolet radiation: Risk reduction and exposure limits, In: Human Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation: Risks and Regulations (Eds: Passchier WF, Bosnjakovic BFM), New York, Excerpta Medica Division, Elsevier Science Publishers, pp 425–437.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    WHO (1980), Environmental Health Criteria No. 14, Ultraviolet Radiation, joint publication of the United Nations Environmental Program, the International Radiation Protection Association and the World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    ANSI (1986) Safe Use of Lasers, Standard Z-136.1-1986, American National Standards Institute, New York, published by Laser Institute of America, Toledo.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    IRPA/INIRC (1989) Guidelines for exposure to ultraviolet radiation, Health Physics, Jun 89.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Forbes PD, Davies PD (1982) Factors that Influence Photocarcinogenesis, in: (J.A. Parrish, M. L. Kripke, and W.L. Morison, Eds.) Chapter 7, “Photoimmunology,” Plenum Publishing Corp., New York.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cole CA, Forbes, DF, Davies PD (1986) An action spectrum for UV photocarcinogenesis, Photochm Photobiol 43(3):275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pitts DG, Cullen AP, Hacker PD (1977) Ocular effects of ultraviolet radiation from 295 to 365 nm, Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 16(10):932–939.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ham WT, Jr, Mueller HA, Ruffolo JJ, Jr, Guerry D, III Guerry RK (1982) Action spectrum for retinal injury from near-ultraviolet radiation in the aphakic monkey, Am J Ophthalmol 93(3): 299–306.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mainster MA (1978) Spectral transmission of intraocular lenses and retinal damage from intense light sources, Am J Ophthalmol 85:167–170.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yanuzzi, LA, Fisher YL, Krueger A, Slakter J. (1987) Solar retinopathy, a photobiological and geophysical analysis. Tr Am Ophthalmol Soc, 85:120–158.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sliney DH, Benton RE, Cole HM, Epstein SG, Morin CJ (1987) Transmission of potentially hazardous actinic ultraviolet radiation through fabrics, Appl Ind Hyg 2(l):36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sliney, DH, The Optical Spectrum: Laser and Ultraviolet Sources and Standards, at Lloyd’s Conference on Radiation and Energy, Dec 1983.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bos AJJ, DeHaas MP (1987) On the safe use of a high power ultraviolet laser, In: Human Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation: Risks and Regulations (Eds: Passchier WF, Bosnjakovic BFM), New York, Excerpta Medica Division, Elsevier Science Publishers, pp 377–382.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Boettner EA: Spectral Transmission of the Eye. Final Report AF 41-609-2996, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks AFB, TX. DTIC No. AD 663-246, July 1967.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • David H. Sliney
    • 1
  1. 1.Laser Microwave DivisionUS Army Environmental Hygiene AgencyUSA

Personalised recommendations