Advertisement

Cross-Cultural Aspects of Environmental Design

  • Amos Rapoport
Part of the Human Behavior and Environment book series (HUBE, volume 4)

Abstract

In considering the relationship between culture and environmental design this chapter will suggest that these two are intimately related and that cultural differences must be considered in tracing environmental effects and in stating design requirements. Since culture is variable, designed environments respond to variable definitions of needs and priorities as expressed in varying schemata: environments are culture specific. In being so they are congruent with specific life-styles. For one thing, both designs and life-styles can be seen as resulting from sets of choices among many alternatives which even the most severe constraints make possible. These choices reflect certain ideal images and schemata, i.e., both environments and life-styles are shaped by cultural “templates.” At smaller scales this process results in sets of cues which are encoded in the environment and help guide behavior. In order to be useful cues need to be decoded—if they cannot be decoded, then environments are effectively meaningless—another reason for the culture specific nature of environments.

Keywords

Social Identity Cognitive Style Cognitive Schema Environmental Design Space Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R. L. A. Uncertainty in nature, cognitive dissonance, and the perceptual distortion of environmental information: Weather forecasts and New England beach trip decisions. In J. H. Sims & D. D. Baumann (Eds.), Human behavior and the environment. Chicago: Maroufa Press, 1974, pp. 162–172.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. N., Jr. Some Chinese methods of dealing with crowding. Urban Anthropology, 1972, 1, 141–150.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, R. G. Ecological psychology. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. Barth, F. Nomads of South Persia: The Basseri tribe of the Khamseh confederacy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1961.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, F. D. A class-conscious evaluation (going back to Sacramento’s Mall). Landscape Architecture, 1973, 64, 448–457.Google Scholar
  6. Berry, J. W. Human ecology and cognitive style. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. Bochner, S. The house form as a cornerstone of culture. In R. W. Brislin (Ed.), Topics in culture learning (Vol. 3). Honolulu: East-West Center, 1975, 9–20.Google Scholar
  8. Bodley, J. H. Victims of progress. Menlo Park, Calif.: Cummings, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. Brolin, B. C., & Zeisel, J. Mass housing: Social research and design. Architectural Forum, (July/August, 1968), 129, 66–71.Google Scholar
  10. Boyden, S. V. (Ed.). The impact of civilization on the biology of man. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  11. Boyden, S. V. Conceptual basis of proposed international ecological studies in large metropolitan areas. Unpublished manuscript, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. Burch, E. J., Jr. The non-empirical environment of the Arctic Alaskan Eskimo. Southwest Journal of Anthropology, 1971, 27, 148–165.Google Scholar
  13. Carr, S. City signs and lights: A policy study. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  14. Cawte, J. Cruel, poor and brutal nations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  15. Cawte, J. Medicine is the law. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  16. Choay, F. Remarques à propos de sémiologie urbaine. Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, December 1970/January 1971, 42, 9–10.Google Scholar
  17. Crumrine, N. R. The house cross of the Mayo Indians of Sonora, Mexico (a symbol of ethnic identity). Tucson: University of Arizona Press, Anthropology Paper No. 8, 1964.Google Scholar
  18. Doob, L. W. Patterning of time. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  19. Downs, R. M., & Stea, D. Maps in minds: Reflections on cognitive mapping. New York: Harper and Row, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. Ehrlich, A. S. History, ecology and demography in the British Caribbean: An analysis of East Indian ethnicity. Southwest Journal of Anthropology, 1971, 27, 166–180.Google Scholar
  21. Eidt, R. C. Pioneer settlement in northeast Argentina. Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1971.Google Scholar
  22. Eiseley, L. C. Alternatives to technology. In A. W. Morse & W. Cooney (Eds.), The environment of change. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969, pp. 165–180.Google Scholar
  23. Erickson, K. A. Ceremonial landscapes of the American West. Landscape, (Autumn 1977), 22, 39–47.Google Scholar
  24. Esber, G., Jr. Indians, architects and anthropologists: A study of proxemic behavior in a Western Apache society. Man-Environment Systems, March, 1972a, 2, 58.Google Scholar
  25. Esber, G., Jr. Indian housing for Indians. The Kiva, 1972b, 3, 141–147.Google Scholar
  26. Fernandez, J. W. Fang architectonics. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Working Paper No. 1, 1977.Google Scholar
  27. Firey, W. Sentiment and symbolism as ecological variables. In G. A. Theodorson (Ed.), Studies in Human Ecology. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson, 1961, pp. 253–261.Google Scholar
  28. Fitzgerald, C. P. Barbarian beds. London: Cressett Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  29. Foddy, W. H. The use of common residential area open space in Australia. Ekistics, 1977, 43, 81–83.Google Scholar
  30. Fox, R. The cultural animal. Encounter, 1970, XXXV, 31–42.Google Scholar
  31. Gibson, J.J. The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1950.Google Scholar
  32. Gibson, J. J. The senses considered as perceptual systems. London: Allen & Unwin, 1968.Google Scholar
  33. Goldman, I. The mouth of heaven: An introduction to Kwakiutl religious thought. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  34. Hall, E. T. The hidden dimension. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar
  35. Hall, E. T. Environmental communication. In A. H. Esser (Ed.), Behavior and environment. New York: Plenum Press, 1971, pp. 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hamburg, D. A. Ancient man in the twentieth century. In V. Goodall (Ed.), The quest for man. New York: Praeger, 1975.Google Scholar
  37. Hamilton, P. Aspects of interdependence between Aboriginal social behaviour and the spatial and physical environment. Seminar on low-cost housing for Aborigines in remote areas. Royal Australian Institute of Architects. Canberra (February, 1972).Google Scholar
  38. Harrington, M. Resettlement and self-image. Human Relations, 1965, 18 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hewitt, K., & Hare, F. K. Man and environment (conceptual framework). Commission on College Geography, Resource Paper No. 20. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Geographers, 1973.Google Scholar
  40. Hill, D. A. The changing landscape of a Mexican municipio (Villa Las Rosas, Chiapas). Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Geography Research Paper No. 91, 1964.Google Scholar
  41. Ittelson, W. H. Some factors influencing the design and function of psychiatric facilities. Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College, 1960.Google Scholar
  42. Jaulin, R. Ethnocide: The theory and practice of cultural murder. The Ecologist, 1971, 1, 12–15.Google Scholar
  43. Jones, W. T. World views: Their nature and their function. Current Anthropology, 1972, 13, 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jopling, C.F. Aesthetic behavior as an adaptive strategy. Paper given at the XLI Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, Mexico City, September, 1974.Google Scholar
  45. Kearney, M. The winds of Ixtepeji: World view and society in a Zapotec town. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.Google Scholar
  46. King, A. D. Colonial urban development: Culture, social power and environment. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976.Google Scholar
  47. Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge: Harvard University, Papers of the Peabody Museum, 1952, Vol. XLVII, No. 1.Google Scholar
  48. Larimore, A. E. The alien town: Patterns of settlement in Busoga, Uganda. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research Paper No. 55, 1958.Google Scholar
  49. Lawton, M. P. Planning environments for older people. AIP Journal, 1970, 36, 124–129.Google Scholar
  50. LeVine, R. A. Culture, behavior and personality. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.Google Scholar
  51. Lévi-Strauss, C. The raw and the cooked (J. & D. Weightman, Trans.) London: Jonathan Cape, 1970.Google Scholar
  52. Lowenthal, D. The American scene. Geographical Review, 1968, 58, 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lowenthal, D., & Prince, H. The English landscape. Geographical Review, 1964, 54, 309–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lowenthal, D., & Prince, H. English landscape tastes. Geographical Review, 1965, 55, 186–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Michelson, W. Analytic sampling for design information: A survey of housing experiences. In H. Sanoff & S. Cohn (Eds.), EDRA, 1970, 1, 183–197.Google Scholar
  56. Michelson, W., & Reed, P. The theoretical status and operational usage of lifestyle in environmental research. Toronto: University of Toronto, Center for Urban and Community Studies, Research Paper No. 36, September, 1970.Google Scholar
  57. Mitchell, R. E. Some social implications of high density housing. American Sociological Review, 1971, 36, 18–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moos, R. H. Systems for the assessment and classification of human environments: An overview. In R. H. Moos & P. M. Insel (Eds.), Issues in social ecology: Human milieus. Palo Alto, Calif.: National Press Books, 1974, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
  59. Müller, W. Weltbild und Kult der Kwakiutl Indianer. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1955. The New York Times, January 24, 1971.Google Scholar
  60. Nicolson, M. H. Mountain gloom and mountain glory. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  61. Ohnuki-Tierney, O. Spatial concepts of the Ainu of the northwest coast of southern Sakhalin. American Anthropologist, 1972, 74, 426–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ortiz, A. Ritual drama and the Pueblo world view. In A. Ortiz (Ed.), New perspectives on the Pueblos. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1972, pp. 135–162.Google Scholar
  63. Pelto, P., & Pelto, G. H. Intracultural diversity: Some theoretical issues. American Ethnologist, 1975, 2, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Perin, C. With man in mind. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  65. Petonnet, C. Réflexions au sujet de la ville vue par en desous. L’Anné Sociologique, 1972, 21, 151–185.Google Scholar
  66. Rapoport, A. The personal element in housing: An argument for open-ended design. R.I.B.A. Journal, July, 1968, pp. 300–307.Google Scholar
  67. Rapoport, A. House form and culture. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969a.Google Scholar
  68. Rapoport, A. The pueblo and the hogan: A cross-cultural comparison of two responses to an environment. In P. Oliver (Ed.), Shelter and society. London: Barrie and Rockliff, 1969b, pp. 66–79.Google Scholar
  69. Rapoport, A. The study of spatial quality. Journal of Aesthetic Education 1970a, 4, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rapoport, A.Symbolism and environmental design. International Journal of Symbology, 1970b, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
  71. Rapoport, A. An approach to the study of environmental quality. In H. Sanoff & S. Cohn (Eds.), Environmental design research association first annual conference, 1970c, 1–13.Google Scholar
  72. Rapoport, A. Australian Aborigines and the definition of place. In W. Mitchell (Ed.), Environmental design research association third annual conference, 1972, Vol. 1, pp. 3 – 3–1–3–3–14. In a different form in P. Oliver (Ed.), Shelter, sign and symbol. London: Barrie and Jenkins, 1975, pp. 38–51.Google Scholar
  73. Rapoport, A. Images, symbols and popular design. International Journal of Symbology, 1973, 4, 1–12.Google Scholar
  74. Rapoport, A. An “anthropological” approach to environmental design research. In B. Honikman (Ed.), Responding to social change. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1975, pp. 145–151.Google Scholar
  75. Rapoport, A. Socio-cultural aspects of man-environment studies. In A. Rapoport (Ed.), The mutual interaction of people and their built environment: A cross cultural perspective. The Hague: Mouton, 1976a, pp. 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rapoport, A. Environmental cognition in cross-cultural perspective. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Gollege (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1976b, pp. 220–234.Google Scholar
  77. Rapoport, A. Human aspects of urban form. Oxford: Pergamon, 1977.Google Scholar
  78. Rapoport, A. On the environment as an enculturating medium. In S. Weidemann & J. A. Anderson (Eds.), Priorities for environmental design research. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Design Research Association, 1978a, pp. 54–58.Google Scholar
  79. Rapoport, A. Culture and the subjective effects of stress. Urban Ecology, 1978b, 3, 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rapoport, A. Nomadism as a man-environment system. Environment and Behavior, 1978c, 10, 215–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rapoport, A. On the environment and the definition of the situation. Paper given at the Ninth Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Association, Tucson, Ariz., April, 1978d.Google Scholar
  82. Rapoport, A. Sacred places, sacred occasions, sacred environments. Paper given at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Comparative Study of Civilizations, Milwaukee, Wis., April, 1978e.Google Scholar
  83. Rapoport, A. On the cultural origins of settlements. In A. J. Catanese & J. Snyder (Eds.), Introduction to planning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979a.Google Scholar
  84. Rapoport, A. On the cultural origins of architecture. In J. Snyder & A.]. Catanese (Eds.), Introduction to architecture. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979b.Google Scholar
  85. Rapoport, A., & Hawkes, R. The perception of urban complexity. AIP Journal, 1970, 36, 106–111.Google Scholar
  86. Rapoport, A., & Watson, N. Cultural variability in physical standards. In R. Gutman (Ed.), People and buildings. New York: Basic Books, 1972, pp. 33–53. (Originally published in the Transactions of the Bartlett Society, Vol. 6, 1967–1968.)Google Scholar
  87. Rappaport, R. A. Ritual, sanctity and cybernetics. American Anthropologist, 1971a, 73, 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rappaport, R. A. The sacred in human evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systemics, 1971b, 2, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ricci, K. Using the building as a therapeutic tool in youth treatment. In New environments for the incarcerated. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Aid Administration, 1972, pp. 22–32.Google Scholar
  90. Richardson, M. The Spanish-American (Colombian) settlement pattern as societal expression and as behavioral cause. In H. J. Walker & W. G. Haag (Eds.), Man and cultural heritage: Papers in honor of Fred B. Kniffen, Geoscience and Man, Vol. V. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1974, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
  91. Rosser, C., & Harris, C. The family and social change: A study of family and kinship in a South Wales town. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rossi, A. A biosocial perspective on parenting. Daedalus, Spring 1977, 206, 1–32.Google Scholar
  93. Sadalla, E. K., Snyder, P. Z., & Stea, D. House form and culture revisited. Paper given at the Seventh Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association, Vancouver, 1976.Google Scholar
  94. Savarton, S., & George, K. R. A study of historic, economic and sociocultural factors which influence Aboriginal settlements at Wilcannia and Weilmeringle, NSW. Unpublished B. Arch. Thesis, University of Sydney, 1971.Google Scholar
  95. Schak, D. C. Determinants of children’s play patterns in a Chinese city: An interplay of space and values. Urban Anthropology, 1972, 1, 195–204.Google Scholar
  96. Schnapper, D. L’Italie rouge et noire: Les modèles de la vie quotidienne a Bologne. Paris: Gallimard, 1971.Google Scholar
  97. Siegel, B. J. Defensive structuring and environmental stress. American Journal of Sociology, 1970, 76, 11–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sopher, D. Landscapes and seasons: Man and nature in India. Landscape, Spring, 1964, 13, 14–19.Google Scholar
  99. Stanislawski, D. The anatomy of eleven towns in Michoacan. Austin: University of Texas, Institute of Latin American Studies, No. X, 1950.Google Scholar
  100. Szalay, L. B., & Bryson, J. A. Measurements of psychosocial distance: A comparison of American blacks and whites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Szalay, L. B., & Maday, B. C. Verbal associations in the analysis of subjective culture. Current Anthropology, 1973, 14, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tiger, L. Men in groups. New York: Random House, 1969.Google Scholar
  103. Tiger, L., & Fox, R. The zoological perspective in social science. Man, 1966, 1, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tiger, L., & Fox, R. The imperial animal. New York: Delta Books, 1971.Google Scholar
  105. Tiger, L., & Shepher, J. Women in the kibbutz. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovitch, 1975.Google Scholar
  106. Tuan, Y. Topophilia. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
  107. Turnbull, C. M. The mountain people. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1972.Google Scholar
  108. Ucko, P. J., Tringham, R., & Dimbleby, G. W. (Eds.). Man, settlement and urbanism. London: Duckworth, 1972.Google Scholar
  109. Venturi, R., Scott-Brown, D., & Izenour, S. Learning from Las Vegas. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  110. Vogt, E. Z. Some aspects of Zanacantan settlement patterns and ceremonial organization. In K. C. Chang (Ed.), Settlement archaeology. Palo Alto, Calif.: National Press, 1968, pp. 154–173.Google Scholar
  111. Vogt, E. Z. Tortillas for the gods: A symbolic analysis of Zinacantecan rituals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  112. Washburn, S. L., & Lancaster, C. S. The evolution of hunting. In R. B. Lee & I. DeVore (Eds.), Man the hunter. Chicago: Aldine, 1968, p. 293ff.Google Scholar
  113. Yaker, H. M., Osmond, H., & Cheek, F. (Eds.). The future of time. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1971.Google Scholar
  114. Yancey, W. L. Architecture, interaction and social control. Environment and Behavior, 1971, 3, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Zeisel, J. Symbolic meaning of space and the physical dimension of social relations. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association annual meeting, September 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amos Rapoport
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations