Abstract
Risks are inherent in human activity. Society has devised a series of tools (or institutions or modes of behavior) to cope with risk; some of the coping takes the form of risk reduction behavior and some takes the form of rationalizing the acceptance of risk. Much of the nonrational behavior can be seen as suboptimizing, given the difficulty and expense of obtaining data, the difficulty and expense of analysis, and the cost of changing behavior. Three contradictions exemplify the difficulty of regulating risk: we are safer than ever before but more worried about risk, consumerists have achieved virtually all of their objectives but there is general dissatisfaction with risk regulation, and regulations never seem to achieve their objective. These contradictions show the need for explicit estimation of risks, costs, and benefits and recognition of the difficulty of changing individual’s behavior. Only by recognizing the difficulties of regulating risks and developing thoughtful approaches can we hope to achieve progress.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lave, L.B. (1980). Economic Tools for Risk Reduction. In: Schwing, R.C., Albers, W.A. (eds) Societal Risk Assessment. General Motors Research Laboratories. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0447-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0445-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive