Defendants Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity

  • Henry J. Steadman
  • Jeraldine Braff
Part of the Perspectives in Law & Psychology book series (PILP, volume 6)

Abstract

In 1974, discussing the state of empirical data available in the United States on the criminally insane we said:

In the research literature on the mechanisms that process the criminally insane... there are some consistencies such as recidivism rate comparisons.... However, such consistencies and even studies that allow such comparisons do not dominate the area. Rather, non-cumulative studies, which barely begin to meet the needs in these problem areas, are the norm. Unfortunately, even less adequate data is available on the personal characteristics of those people who pass through these processing points. (Steadman & Cocozza, 1974, p. 38)

Keywords

Resi Dinate Lewin Pase 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arens, R. Make mad the guilty. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1969.Google Scholar
  2. Burton, N., & Steadman, H. J. Legal professionals’ perceptions of the insanity defense. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 1978, 6, 173–187.Google Scholar
  3. Cooke G., & Pogany, E. The influence on judges’ sentencing practices of a mental evaluation. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 1975, 3, 245–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooke, G., & Sikorski, C. Factors affecting length of hospitalization in persons adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 1974, 2, 251–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Coser, L. A., & Rosenberg, B. Sociological Theory: A Book of Readings. New York: Macmillan, 1964.Google Scholar
  6. Fukunaga, K. The criminally insane. Honolulu: Hawaii State Department of Health, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. Greenland, C. Crime and the insanity defense, an international comparison: Ontario and New York State. The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 1979, VH(2), 125-138.Google Scholar
  8. Lewin, T. Disposition of the irresponsible protection following commitment. Michigan Law Review, February 1968, 66, 721–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Matthews, A. R., Jr. Mental illness and the criminal law: Is community mental health an answer? American Journal of Public Health, September 1967, 57 (9), 1571–1579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Matthews, A. R., Jr. Mental disability and the criminal law: A field study. Chicago: American Bar Association, 1970.Google Scholar
  11. Monahan, J. The psychiatrization of criminal behavior: A reply. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, February 1973, 24(2), 105–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Monahan, J. The Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior. Washington, D.C.: USGPO, 1981.Google Scholar
  13. Morrow, W. R., & Petersen, D. B. Follow-up on discharged offenders—“not guilty by reason of insanity” and “criminal sexual psychopaths.” Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 1966, 57, 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pasewark, R. A., & Lanthorn, B. W. Disposition of persons utilizing the insanity plea in a rural state. Journal of Humanics, 1977, 5, 87–98.Google Scholar
  15. Pasewark, R. A., & Pantle, M. L. Insanity plea: legislator’s view. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1979, 136, 222–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pasewark, R. A., Pantle, M. L., & Steadman, H. J. Characteristics and disposition of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity in New York State, 1971–76. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1979, 136, 655–660. (a)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pasewark, R. A., Pantb, M. L. & Steadman, H. J. The insanity plea in New York State 1965-1976. New York State Bar Journal, 1979, 51, pp. 186–189, 217-225. (b)Google Scholar
  18. Pasewark, R. A., Pantle, M. L., & Steadman, H. J. Insanity acquittees and felons: A control study of their detention and rearrest. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1982, 139, 892–897.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pasewark, R. A., & Seidenzahl, D. Opinions concerning the insanity plea and criminality among mental patients. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 1980, 1, 199–202.Google Scholar
  20. Petrila, J. Intersections between the criminal justice and mental health systems. Paper presented at the 6th International Symposium on Law and Psychiatry. Charlottesville, Va., June 11-13, 1981.Google Scholar
  21. Rubin, B. Prediction of dangerousness in mentally ill criminals. Archives of General Psychiatry, September 1972, 27, 397–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scheidemandel, P. L., & Kanno, C. L. The mentally ill offender: A survey of treatment programs. Washington, D.C.: Joint Information Service, 1969.Google Scholar
  23. Simon, R. J. The jury and the defense of insanity. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1967.Google Scholar
  24. Singer, A. Insanity acquittals in the seventies: Observations and empirical analysis of one jurisdiction. Mental Disability Law Reporter, 1978, 2, 406–417.Google Scholar
  25. Steadman, H. J. Insanity acquittals in New York State, 1965–1978. American Journal of Psychiatry, March 1980, 137(3), 321–326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Steadman, H. J., & Cocozza, J. J. Careers of the criminally insane. Lexington, Ma.: D.C. Heath, 1974.Google Scholar
  27. Steadman, H. J., Cocozza, J. J., & Melick, M. E. Explaining the increased arrest rate among mental patients: The changing clientele of state hospitals. American Journal of Psychiatry, July 1978, 135(7), 816–820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Steadman, H. J., Monahan, J., Hartstone, E., Davis, S. K., & Robbins, P. C. Mentally disordered offenders: A national survey of patients and facilities. Law and Human Behavior, 1982, 6, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry J. Steadman
    • 1
  • Jeraldine Braff
    • 1
  1. 1.Special Projects Research UnitNew York State Department of Mental HygieneAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations