Advertisement

Methods to Measure the Repair of Genes

  • Vilhelm A. Bohr

Abstract

Recently, there has been a lot of interest and many studies in the area of gene-specific repair. Demonstrations of DNA repair heterogeneity within the genome date back more than a decade. An early example of repair heterogeneity was the demonstration that repair incorporation in the first hours after UV damage was preferentially associated with the nuclear matrix (Mullenders et al., 1984). Other studies had shown DNA damage and repair heterogeneity in different subfractions of the cellular nucleus, within the genome, or in repetitive DNA sequences (reviewed in Bohr et al., 1987). A critical advance in this area of research was the development of a general technique to study the DNA repair process in individual genes (Bohr et al., 1985). This assay employed quantitative Southern blot analysis and it has at times been called the Bohr-Hanawalt technique. It is described below. The principal idea in this approach is to use a DNA repair enzyme to generate a strand break at the site of a lesion, and then to measure the frequency of DNA lesions within specific restriction fragments located within specific genes. Early experiments using this approach showed that genes could be repaired much more efficiently than the bulk of the DNA, and this led to the introduction of the concept of “preferential gene repair.” In the past years, numerous experiments have examined this technique and the use of strand-specific DNA probes in this same assay (Mellon et al., 1987) has led to new insight into the molecular link between DNA repair and transcription.

Keywords

Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Pyrimidine Dimer Strand Bias DHFR Gene Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aboussekhra, A., and Wood, R. D. (1994). Repair of UV-damaged DNA by mammalian cells and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4:212–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beecham, E. J., Jones, G. M., Link, C., Huppi, K., Potter, M., Mushinski, J. F., and Bohr, V. A. (1994). DNA repair defects associated with chromosomal translocation breaksite regions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:1204–1212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohr, V. A. (1991). Gene specific DNA repair. Carcinogenesis 12:1983–1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohr, V. A. (1993). Gene specific DNA repair. Relation to mutagenesis and genomic instability, in:Alfred Benzon Symposium 35:DNA Repair Mechanisms (V. A. Bohr, K. Wassermann, and K. H. Kraemer, eds.), Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp. 217–228.Google Scholar
  5. Bohr, V. A. (1995). DNA repair fine structure and its relation to genomic instability. Carcinogenesis, 16:2885–2892.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohr, V. A., and Okumoto, D. S. (1988). Analysis of pyrimidine dimers in defined genes, in:DNA Repair: A Laboratory Manual of Research Procedures (E. C. Friedberg and P. C. Hanawalt, eds.), Dekker, New York, pp. 347–366.Google Scholar
  7. Bohr, V. A., Smith, C. A., Okumoto, D. S., and Hanawalt, P. C. (1985). DNA repair in an active gene: Removal of pyrimidine dimers from the DHFR gene of CHO cells is much more efficient than in the genome overall. Cell 40:359–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohr, V. A., Phillips, D. H., and Hanawalt, P. C. (1987). Heterogenous DNA damage and repair in the mammalian genome. Cancer Res. 47:6426–6436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohr, V. A., Taffe, B., and Larminat, F. (1995). DNA repair, oxidative stress, and ageing, in:Oxidative Stress and Ageing (R. Cutler and L. Packer, eds.), Birkhauser Verlag, Berlin, pp. 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carothers, A. M., Zhen, W., Mucha, J., Zhang, Y., Santella, R. M., Grunberger, D., and Bohr, V. A. (1992). DNA strand-specific repair of (+/−)−3α,4β-dihydroxy-lα,2α-epoxy-l,2,3,4-tetrahydro-benzo[c]phenanthrene adducts in the hamster dihydrofolate reductase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:11925–11929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denissenko, M. F., Venkatachalam, S., Yamasaki, E. F., and Wani, A. A. (1994). Assessment of DNA damage and repair in specific genomic regions by quantitative immuno-coupled PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:2351–2359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans, M. K., and Bohr, V. A. (1994). Gene-specific DNA repair of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in some cancer-prone and premature-aging human syndromes. Mutat Res. 314:221–231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, M. K., Taffe, B. G., Harris, C. C., and Bohr, V. A. (1993). DNA strand bias in the repair of the p53 gene in normal human and xeroderma pigmentosum group C fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 53:5377–5381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Govan, H. L., 3rd, Valles-Ayoub, Y., and Braun, J. (1990). Fine-mapping of DNA damage and repair in specific genomic segments. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:3823–3830.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanawalt, P. C. (1994). Transcription-coupled repair and human disease. Science 266:1957–1958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanawalt, P. C., and Mellon, I. (1993). Stranded in an active gene. Curr. Biol. 3:67–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jennerwein, M. M., and Eastman, A. (1991). A polymerase chain reaction based method to detect cisplatin adducts in specific genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:6209–6214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, J., Zhen, W., Reed, E., Parker, R. J., Sancar, A., and Bohr, V. A. (1991). Gene specific formation and repair of cisplatin intrastrand adducts and interstrand crosslinks in CHO cells. J. Biol. Chem. 266:7101–7107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalinowski, D. P., Illenye, S., and Van Houten, B. (1992). Analysis of DNA damage and repair in murine leukemia L1210 cells using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:3485–3494 (Abstract).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larminat, R., Zhen, W., and Bohr, V. A. (1993). Gene-specific DNA repair of interstrand cross-links induced by chemotherapeutic agents can be preferential. J. Biol. Chem. 268:2649–2654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Leadon, S. A., and Cooper, P. K. (1993). Preferential repair of ionizing radiation-induced damage in the transcribed strand of an active human gene is defective in Cockayne’s syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:10499–10503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leadon, S.A., and Snowdon, M. M. (1988). Differential repair of DNA damage in the human metallothionein gene family. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:5331–5338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. LeDoux, S. P., Wilson, G. L., Beecham, E. J., Stevnsner, T., Wassermann, K., and Bohr, V. A. (1992). Repair of mitochondrial DNA after various types of DNA damage in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Carcinogenesis 13:1967–1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mellon, L, Spivak, G., and Hanawalt, P. C. (1987). Selective removal of transcription-blocking DNA damage from the transcribed strand of the mammalian DHFR gene. Cell 51:241–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mullenders, L. H. F., van Kesteren, A. C., Bussman, C. J. M., van Zeeland, A. A., and Natarajan, A. T. (1984). Preferential DNA repair of nuclear matrix associated DNA in xeroderma pigmentosum group C. Mutat. Res. 141:75–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rampino, N. J. (1995). Oxidative DNA damage and preferential repair. J. Cell. Biochem. 294 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  27. Rampino, N., and Bohr, V. A. (1994). Rapid preferential repair of cisplatin lesions at the DUG/DHFR locus comprising the divergent upstream gene and DHFR gene during early G1 phase of the cell cycle assayed by using the exonucleolytic activity of the T4 DNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10977–10981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. R., and Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.Google Scholar
  29. Snyderwine, E. G., and Bohr, V. A. (1992). Gene-and strand-specific damage and repair in Chinese hamster ovary cell treated with 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide. Cancer Res. 52:4183–4189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tang, M. S., Bohr, V. A., Zhang, X. S., Pierce, J., and Hanawalt, P. C. (1989). Quantitation of aminofluorene adduct formation and repair in defined DNA sequences in mammalian cells using UVrABC nuclease. J. Biol, Chem. 264:14455–14462.Google Scholar
  31. Tang, M., Pao, A., and Zhang, X. (1994). Repair of benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide-and UV-induced DNA damage in dihydrofolate reductase and adenine phosphoribosyltransferase genes of CHO cells. J. Biol. Chem. 269:12749–12754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomale, J., Hochleitner, K., and Rajewsky, M. F. (1994). Differential formation and repair of the mutagen DNA alkylation product O6 ethylguanine in transcribed and nontranscribed genes of the rat. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1681–1686.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Thomas, D. C., Okumoto, D. S., Sancar, A., and Bohr, V. A. (1989). Preferential repair of (6−4) photoproducts in the dihydrofolate reductase gene of Chinese hamster ovary cells. J. Biol. Chem. 264:18005–18010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Vos, J., and Hanawalt, P. C. (1987). Processing of psoralen adducts in an active gene: Repair and replication of DNA containing monoadducts and interstrand crosslinks. Cell 50:1789–1799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wassermann, K., Kohn, K. W., and Bohr, V. A. (1990). Heterogeneity of nitrogen mustard-induced DNA damage and repair at the level of the gene in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J. Biol. Chem. 265:13906–13913.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vilhelm A. Bohr
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute on AgingNational Institutes of HealthBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations