Advertisement

Environmental Psychology and Biosphere 2

  • Robert B. Bechtel
  • Taber MacCallum
  • Jane Poynter

Abstract

This chapter deals with two categories of research in environmental psychology, the ecological psychology of the Biosphere 2 environment and the selection process related to that environment.

Keywords

Behavior Setting Crew Member Richness Index Dine Room Ecological Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barker, R. (1968). Ecological psychology.Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bechtel, R. (1977). Enclosing behavior.East Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.Google Scholar
  3. Bechtel, R., & Ledbetter, C. (1976). The temporary environment.Hanover: Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory.Google Scholar
  4. Butcher, J. (1987). Use of the MMPI in personnel screening.Paper presented at the 22nd annual symposium on recent developments of the MMPI, Seattle.Google Scholar
  5. Butcher, J. (1992). Psychological assessment of airline pilot applications: Validity and clinical scores. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  6. Carrere, S., Evans, G., & Stokols, D. (1991). Winter-over stress: Physiological and psychological adaptation to an Antarctic isolated confined environment. In A. Harrison, Y. Clearwater, & C. McKay (Eds.), From Antarctica to outer space (pp. 229–238). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gunderson, E. (Ed.). (1974). Human adaptability to Antarctic conditions.New York: American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar
  8. Helmes, E., & Reddon, J. (1993). A perspective on developments in assessing pathology: A critical review of the MMPI and MMPI 2. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Helmreich, R. (1974). Evaluation of environments: Behavior observations in an undersea habitat. In J. Lang, C. Burnette, W. Moleski, & D. Vachon (Eds.), Designing for human behavior (pp. 274–285). East Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.Google Scholar
  10. Kahn, P., & Leon, G. (1994). Group climate and individual functioning in an all-women’s Antarctic expedition team. Environment & Behavior, 25, pp. 669–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leon, G., McNally, C., & Ben-Porath, Y. (1989). Personality characteristics, mood and coping patterns in a successful North Pole expedition team. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oliver, D. (1991). Psychological effects of isolation and confinement of a winter-over group at McMurdo Station, Antarctica. In A. Harrison, Y. Clearwater, & C. McKay (Eds.). From Antarctica to outer space (pp. 217–228). New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ornish, D. (1991). Program for reversing heart disease.New York: Ballentine.Google Scholar
  14. Rivolier, J., Bachelard, C., & Cazes, G. (1991). Crew selection for an Antarctic-based space simulator. In A. Harrison, Y. Clearwater, & C. McKay (Eds.) From Antarctica to outer space (pp....). New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Santy, P. (1994). Choosing the right stuff: The psychological selection New York: Praeger Greenwood.Google Scholar
  16. Schoggen, P. (1989). Behavior settings.Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Spivack, M. (1984). Institutional settings: An environmental design approach.New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert B. Bechtel
    • 1
  • Taber MacCallum
    • 2
  • Jane Poynter
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Paragon Space Development CorporationTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations