Advertisement

Landscape Values

Congruence and Conflict in Desert Riparian Areas
  • Ervin H. Zube

Abstract

Common descriptors of deserts include “desolate,” “hot,” “arid, uninhabitable,” and, occasionally, “wasteland.” This chapter reports on research that spans approximately 15 years. The primary focus is on congruencies and conflicts among the perceived values attributed to desert landscapes by diverse interest groups. The specific desert landscapes that were the focus of study are riparian areas places that defy the common descriptors of deserts. They are the places where runoff water from infrequent rains collects and supports linear, green oases that exist in the midst of very extensive desert landscapes that are frequently characterized by a muted spectrum of browns, tans, and grays. More significant characteristics of desert riparian areas, however, are their scarcity and their importance for sustaining life: plant, animal, and human. They have been the sites of human occupantion in Southwestern American deserts for thousands of years (Lister & Lister, 1983). Nevertheless, Ffolliott and Thorud noted in 1974 that significant amounts of riparian areas had been lost within the state of Arizona and that they then accounted for only 0.4% of the surface area of the state. It is very likely that they occupy even less area than that today.

Keywords

Riparian Area Real Estate Agent Renewable Natural Resource Local Decision Maker Common Descriptor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Rivers (1995). America’s ten most threatened rivers.Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Craik, K. H. (1970). The environmental dispositions of Environmental Decision Makers. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 389, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Culhane, P. J. (1981). Public lands politics.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ffolliott, P. F., & Thorud, D. B. (1974). Vegetation management for increased water yield in Arizona. Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 215. Tucson: University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  5. Foust, T. (1995, August 31). Bird area picked among world’s best. Arizona Daily Star, p. C6.Google Scholar
  6. Friedman S. K., & Zube, E. H. (1992). Assessing landscape dynamics in a protected area. Environmental Management, 16(5), 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ibarra, I. (1995, September 1). Army found at fault on river area growth. Arizona Daily Star, p. B2.Google Scholar
  8. Law, C. S. (1984). An experiential assessment of the Arizona landscape.Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Tucson.Google Scholar
  9. Lister, R. H., & Lister, F. C. (1983). Those who came before.Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  10. Pitt, D. G., & Zube, E. H. (1987). Management of natural environments. In D. Stokols, & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology: Vol 2 (pp. 1009–1042). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Simcox, D. E., & Zube, E. H. (1990). Public value orientations toward urban riparian landscapes. Society and Natural Resources 2, 229–239.Google Scholar
  12. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. (1978). Concept plan: Unique wildlife ecosystems, Arizona.Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Zube, E.H. (1987). Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landscape Ecology, 1(1), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zube, E. H., & Law, C. S. (1981). Natural resource values and landscape planning.Paper presented at American Society of Landscape Architects Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Zube, E. H., & Simcox, D. E. (1986). Public perceptions and attitudes towards land use and land use control in the Upper Santa Cruz and Sonoita Creek Areas.Technical Report. University of Arizona, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Tucson.Google Scholar
  16. Zube, E. H., & Simcox, D. E. (1987). Arid lands, riparian landscapes and management conflicts. Environmental Management, 11(4), 529–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zube, E. H., Friedman, S., & Simcox, D.E. (1989). Landscape change: perceptions and physical measures. Environmental Management 13(5), 639–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zube, E. H., Law, C. S., & Carpenter, E. H. (1984). Arizona survey reveals anti-development attitude. Landscape Architecture, 74(6), 97–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ervin H. Zube
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Renewable Natural ResourcesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations