Advertisement

Exploring ‘Our Common Future’

Generalised Interests and Specialised Discourses
  • M. W. J. Spaul

Abstract

This paper describes the early design thinking and experimentation of a long-term project in sustainability education, prompted by the WCED report on environment and development (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987) and Agenda 21 of the Rio Summit (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 1992). The opportunity for this project was provided by the author’s fortuitous involvement in the preparation of two, very different, undergraduate modules: a module on sustainable development, structured around the WCED report, initially intended for a group of planners; and a module which explores the potential of hypertext as a tool for the mass communication of complex ideas, initially intended for a group of multimedia designers. These two projects were brought together by a need to address some of the conceptual difficulties in the WCED conception of sustainable development; in particular, its ambitious multi-disciplinarity. This requirement prompted the question of whether the claimed revolutionary potential of hypertext to promote new, inter-disciplinary ways of thinking (see, e.g., Landow, 1992) could partially fulfill the educational requirements for thinking effectively about sustainable development. In sum, this experiment might be seen as a minor contribution to Chapter 36 of Agenda 21: an attempt to educate students in sustainable development by their reflecting critically on its fundamental assumptions—an interpretation, locally relevant to higher education, of a global need.

Keywords

Sustainable Development Critical Theory Citizen Participation World Commission Participatory Planning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck, U., 1992, Risk Society, Sage: London.Google Scholar
  2. Bookchin, M., 1980, Toward an Ecological Society, Black Rose Books: Montreal.Google Scholar
  3. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F., 1988, A Thousand Plateaus, Athlone Press: London.Google Scholar
  4. Dienel, P. and Renn, O., 1995, Planning cells: a gate to fractal mediation, in Renn, O., Webler T. and Wiedemann, P. (eds.) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Kluwer, London.Google Scholar
  5. Fischer, F. and Forester, J., 1993, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, UCL Press: London.Google Scholar
  6. Forester, J., 1989, Planning in the Face of Power, University of California Press: Berkeley.Google Scholar
  7. Galison, P. and Stump, D., 1996, The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts and Power, Stanford University Press: Stanford.Google Scholar
  8. Habermas, J., 1984, The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1, Heinemann: London.Google Scholar
  9. Habermas, J., 1987, The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2, Polity: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. Habermas, J., 1990, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Polity: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Habermas, J., 1996, Between Facts and Norms, Polity Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Held, D., 1987, Models of Democracy, Polity Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Landow, G., 1992, Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology, Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, M., 1994, Green Delusions: An Environmentalist Critique of Radical Environmentalism, Duke University Press: London.Google Scholar
  15. Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A., 1993, The Quality of Life, Oxford University Press: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ray, L., 1993, Rethinking Critical Theory: Emancipation in the Age of Global Social Movements, Sage: London.Google Scholar
  17. Renn, O., Webler, T. and Wiedemann, R, 1995, Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Kluwer: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rorty, R., 1980, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Ulrich, W., 1993, Some difficulties of ecological thinking considered from a critical systems perspective: a plea for critical holism, Systems Practice 6(6):583–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ulrich, W., 1994, Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy, John Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
  21. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development 1992, Agenda 21 of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  22. Wittgenstein, L., 1969, The Blue and Brown Books, Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. W. J. Spaul
    • 1
  1. 1.Design and CommunicationsAnglia Polytechnic UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations