Time for a New Language, a New Discourse
The thoughts and ideas I put forward in this speculative paper arise out of my initial research on the influence of the new sciences of chaos and complexity on organizational change and transformation. My interest in these and their links to language has been much inspired by the work of Stacey (1993) and, in particular, his reference to the need for a ‘new dominant discourse’ (pers.comm. 1996).
KeywordsDominant Discourse Multiple Interpretation Naive Realism Vivid Image Linear Thinking
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Capra, F., 1996, The Web of Life, HarperCollins: London.Google Scholar
- Dawson, S., 1996, ‘Judged on Merit’, People Management, 8th August 1996.Google Scholar
- Garrett, A., 1996, ‘A Cuckoo in the Nest’, The Times, 26th July 1996.Google Scholar
- Gleick, J., 1987, Chaos — making a new science, Abacus: London.Google Scholar
- Handy, C., 1990, The Age of Unreason, Arrow: London.Google Scholar
- Morgan, G., 1993, Imaginization — the art of creative management, Sage: London.Google Scholar
- Senge, P., 1992, The Fifth Discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization, Century Business: London.Google Scholar
- Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R. and Smith, B., 1994, The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: strategies and tools for building a learning organization, Nicholas Brealey: London.Google Scholar
- Stacey, R., 1996, Pers. comm. ‘The Individual and Work’, OPUS Conference, 13 July.Google Scholar
- Wheatley, M., 1992, Leadership and the New Science, Berrett-Koehler: San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Winograd, T. and Flores, F., 1991, Understanding Computers and Cognition: a foundation for design, Addison-Wesley: Reading MA.Google Scholar